Powered by RealTown Blogs

Manhattan Loft Guy

May. 6, 2010 - riffing with The Miller on the value of Manhattan terraces, decks + balconies


timely stuff
As The Miller said on his blog yesterday, he finally got around to answering a question about Manhattan real estate valuation methodology for outdoor spaces, [Terra Logic] Understanding The Value of Manhattan Apartment Outdoor Space. Great timing (for Manhattan Loft Guy), as I addressed this very question in the May 1, terrace sells for about $1mm at 110 West 25 Street. Of course, I was using a single example and he's got years of data, so we each came at the question in a different way. (If it were a fight, it would not be a fair fight; glad we are not fighting.)

I was originally going to just post a short comment on his blog in response to this post. Then it got to be too long (and convoluted!) to spit on someone else's blog, so I started this post. Then this thing just kept going, and going, and .... Grab your coffee, and keep the pot nearby; this will take a while.

You should read the whole Miller piece, of course (chock full of qualifiers, limitations, disclaimers), but here are the two main parts of his pregnant conclusion [his italics, my bold]:

[a]

  • Estimate the ppsf of the property without the terrace
  • The general relationship between finished terrace space and interior space – terraces are typically valued at 25-50% of the ppsf of the interior space.***
[b] This makes it easier to compare units with and without terraces and is  predicated on the whether your % discount assumption for your exterior space is correct.

 

Note that The Miller's sensible range of qualifiers include whether the outdoor space is disproportionately large (reducing the ppsf) and considerations such as utility, privacy, and location. He says view is not considered as a plus factor with outdoor space because the interior space already factors that in, but I assume he would make an allowance if the outdoor space had a spectacular view not seen from the interior. (I saw one like that yesterday.)

guidelines are guides, d'oh!
I will let The Miller express the core of his disclaimer:

these relationships are developed from market data and can vary significantly depending on the combination of amenities and time

It is great to have A Trusted Professional offer the well-grounded opinion that outdoor spaces typically are valued at 25-50% of interior space depending on a whole bunch of maddeningly variable variables. This seems like a very useful ballpark approach, so long as you accept that you are never going to be able to push it very precisely. (Keep in mind this very pregnant "conclusion" with my very bold bold: "This makes it easier to compare units with and without terraces and is  predicated on the whether your % discount assumption for your exterior space is correct.")

I suspect that the data just is not deep enough to be more precise, particularly in a world in which individual sellers and buyers come to agreements about 'value' that sometimes cannot be rationalized by reference to broad metrics. In that vein, let's look again at the roof deck at 110 West 25 Street and my May 1 analysis that "somebody just paid about $1,000,000 for that deck".

ppsf without deck
I assume in my post that the interior space of the 12th floor is comparable in condition to the 11th floor, which sold in July 2006 at $2.7mm, and to the 10th floor, which sold in July 2005 at $2.766mm. If that assumption is correct, we next consider what adjustment to make between the current market and a mix of July 2005 and July 2006. I am not going to over-manage here (is Joe Girardi a MLG reader??), so I assume that this market is similar to that mixed-market.

Thus, my interior square foot valuation for a beautiful high floor loft at 110 West 25 Street is $1,093/ft. That assumption accounts for $2,733,000 of the recent purchase price of the 12th floor with the "crowning glory" deck. How does that implied deck value of $1,152,000 look under The Miller's analysis?

backing out the deck values, without falling off
The listing description describes the deck this way (without pictures :-):

Currently configured as a 850 SF entertaining area with built-in Weber grill with granite topped island and a separate 650 SF sunning terrace with privacy walls and outdoor shower.


The Market paid $768/ft for that deck, which is 70% of the (assumed) ppsf of interior space ($1,093/ft), way more the typical range of 25-50%.

If I understand The Miller, he would convert the 1,500 sq ft deck into the equivalent of interior space within a range of 337 to 775 sq ft, before considering any adjustments. At the base interior value of $1,093/ft, the deck should add from $368,341 to $736,682. Thus, before considering any adjustments, it appears that The Market over-paid for this deck by at least $400k, possibly substantially more than that.

Before we get to any positive drivers out of that range, consider that The Miller considers this deck to be too large to support full typical values. He says:

if the terrace is greater than 50% of the interior space, the ppsf contribution falls off considerably for the additional space over the 50% threshold.

The interior space of 110 West 25 Street #12 is said to be 2,500 sq ft; the deck, 1,500 sq ft. Thus, 250 sq ft of this deck is "excess" in Miller World, subject to a greater-than-typical discount than the first 1,250 sq ft of deck to make the interior-exterior square feet adjustment. I am not going to do any calculus to even put a ballpark figure on that; just keep that in mind, going forward. 

What plus factors might there be?

great utility = higher value
This deck should place well on The Miller Utility Scale. Both sections of the deck are (mostly) deep; the location is prime-for-the-building, being on top of a 12 story building, with fewer soot or noise issues and (probably) a decent breeze on even the muggiest August dusks; the privacy element may be a wash, as no one shares any nearby outdoor space, but some of The Stratus folks likely look down on this deck; views might  be a little better on the deck than from the 12th floor interior, simply because the window placements limit the views from the interior in some way.

The listing agent would like us to consider a plus factor that The Miller calls "association":

primary amenity – The patio or garden in a ground floor brownstone or apartment – use the same logic as when considering a terrace in a penthouse apartment

After all, this loft was marketed as "#PH". I don't know if The Miller would agree in this case, since this is not a 'real' penthouse. By my lights, a real penthouse is surrounded by a set-back terrace directly accessible from a door in the penthouse. This deck is a roof deck, accessible by going to the roof. It is a great amenity, but not of the same character as the terrace of a real penthouse.

I am not going to add a plus for that, but I have another one that is not addressed in the overview of The Miller.

scarcity = premium value?
I suspect The Miller would find it prudent to consider how many choices a buyer has that include outdoor space. (Makes sense to me.) In the case of this deck, that seems to me the most likely driver for a premium value: someone who loves lofts has relatively few choices that include exclusive rooftop space. That buyer might be willing to 'overpay' to get that amenity, in the same way that people who love views will overpay.

I will never know what specifically motivated this specific buyer to pay about a million bucks for this roof deck. Even with all the qualifiers and disclaimers in The Miller's analysis, I suspect that an appraiser would have a hard time reaching that value. (More on that, below.)

quibble, moan, empathize
I get what The Miller is trying to do in his blog post, and I very much appreciate his insights. His analysis convinces me that the question of Valuing Manhattan Outdoor Space is one of those questions that is more Appraiser Art than Science. When pencil hits spreadsheet, a talented and experienced Manhattan appraiser is going to come up with a 'reasonable' value for any outdoor space after making many, many 'adjustments' from  a ballpark starting point, some of which the appraiser might not even be able to articulate.

What The Miller's blog post tells me is that this is inherently UN-scientific. That this question cannot be answered in any comprehensive and coherent way, because which variables are most important, and how the variables inter-depend, cannot be stated in advance, or in the abstract.

I don't mean to be critical here of The Miller, or his approach. (Quite the contrary, in fact.) I just think that after all his effort, the most critical part of his analysis is his disclaimer (his bold, not mine):

Disclaimer: No comments by an appraiser would be complete without a disclaimer. It is important to note that these are only rules of thumb to guide you – the value of a terrace is not formula driven – these relationships are developed from market data and can vary significantly depending on the combination of amenities and time. If you are unable to grasp this, close your eyes very tightly, think about a cool ocean breeze on a warm breeze sandy beach, while holding a large set of perfect comps, until memories of this post fade completely away.

do guidelines actually add value?
Sad to say, that sounds very much to me like Potter Stewart 'valuing' pornography. The Miller opens the curtain a bit to reveal the scaffold of his analysis, but can't possibly account in a blog post for how he would apply his experience to a particular set of Manhattan square feet exposed to the elements.

Even much qualified, his "non-formula formula" comes down to:

A. Start with a value for the interior in $/ft

B. Pick a sensible number between 25% and 50% from which to start an analysis of the exterior.

C. Adjust that number up or down based on a mix of all that things that you think are relevant.

Yes, this approach is better than a number Pulled From (the) Air.

But it hardly inspires confidence that three appraisers would come within a reasonable range of each other in valuing a specific terrace. I obviously don't have an alternative. But my take-away from this is that no one could push too hard in saying that a terrace is 'really' worth $xxx because at the end of the day it is going to come down to an appraiser's opinion. (JM: is that why they pay the appraisers such Big Bucks??) Any principled conversation about a specific loft will run out of gloves (on the one hand ... on the other hand ... on yet another hand ...).

I tend to look backward to understand how I should interpret what is happening now. Let's go back to the (million dollar??) decks at 110 West 25 Street. I am fairly confident about my valuation of the interior space. What did the bank think about values here?

actual loan = 75%

This condo buyer filed a mortgage for 75% of the $3.885mm purchase price ($2,913,750), so Citibank (at least) could not have been too concerned about the values here. That is nearly $200k more than I think the interior space is worth.

CAVEATS: I could be wrong about the value of the interior space, which might be worth more than the 2005-2006 10th and 11th floor sales indicate. There could be 'plus factors' that The Miller would consider here (if he knew everything about the loft and the deck; I don't), that I have not considered.

Nonetheless, since the buyer got a super-jumbo mortgage for 75% of his purchase price, it appears that the bank thought the deck was worth a lot more than The Miller's 'guidelines' would indicate.  I wonder who did the appraisal and what they used for comps???

Or perhaps things are not quite as they appear....

on further review...
Yes, The Google is my friend. Quick Google search shows that the buyer has the same name as a Managing Director in Citigroup Global Markets. Perhaps this was a loan that they will keep in-house, that did not have to meet ordinary super-jumbo underwriting standards.

Or maybe the deck is worth a great deal. The more I 'know', the more confused I get.

© Sandy Mattingly 2010

 

 

Comments (6) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,

Oct. 10, 2007 - still trying to give that loft away at 12 E 14 (if you buy terrace)


#5A at 12 East 14 Street
is back on the market this week, on its third listing agent of 2007. Ivana Tagliamonte of BHS is now offering this "900 sq ft" loft with "1,200 sq ft" private roof terrace for $1.195mm and $1,364/mo.

It was newly offered by Jim Farah of Corcoran at $1.25mm when I posted on June 5
12 E 14 St terrace $1.25mm -- free loft attached (he thought the roof was 1,174 sq ft, btw). As I said then

It can only be worth it for someone with a serious entertaining lifestyle. Problem may be the 14th Street location (just west of Union Square; no green views, apparently) and the fact that the roof terrace is on top of (only) a 5-story building, No pix of the Empire State Building, and no telling without being there how much of a 'canyon' this rooftop glory may be.

But if you had the lifestyle to take advantage of the kick-ass kitchen and such large entertaining space, the 900 sq ft loft is almost a throw-in, for this much outdoor space. (Figure the loft at about $800/ft and the terrace at about $400/ft.)

I overlooked in June that it had already been offered in April for $1.395mm by Susan Sears of Corcoran, so the owner has had quite a busy year, signing and canceling listing agreements.

Not often that you see a loft with more space outdoors than in. You would never pay $1,000/ft for outdoor space here - but (work with me here) if you did you could get the loft for free.

© Sandy Mattingly 2007
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , ,

Sep. 8, 2007 - open house nuggets / open to the outdoors

 
 
(remember to check the agent websites Sunday morning to see if open house is still on)
 
$3.25mm and $4,278/mo for a bunch of indoor space (2,500 sq ft??) and "2,200 feet" of terrace that I blogged about on Aug 23 (indoors and out at 284 Fifth's PH-B / (almost) brand new); it is being tag-teamed by PruDE and Bellmarc; the link above is PruDE because they have Sunday's open house; Bellmarc is doing Wednesday's
Open House Sunday Sept 9 12 PM - 2
Open House Wednesday Sept 12 5:30 PM - 7
 
$5.7mm (condo; common charges and abated real estate taxes are $3,142/mo) for "3,026 sq ft" full of name-dropping fixtures and appliances and three terraces totaling "1,300 sq ft" that I blogged about on Aug 24 (indoors and out at 92 Warren's penthouse)
Open House Sunday Sept 9 1:30 PM - 3
 
$2.975mm and $3,802/mo (condo) for "1,585 sq ft" plus terrace plus private roof in Loft 25
Open House Sunday Sept 9 2 PM - 4
Open House Tuesday Sept 11 5 PM - 7
 
$2.895mm and $1,566/mo for "2,287 sq ft" of a triplex with "375 sq ft" garden; new two weeks ago
Open House Sunday Sept 9 12 PM - 2
 
© Sandy Mattingly 2007
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , , , , ,

Jun. 4, 2007 - 12 E 14 St terrace $1.25mm -- free loft attached

 
900 sq ft loft with 1,175 ft terrace
#5A at 12 East 14 Street is a new-this-week one bed living space with 100 person roof terrace (1,175 sq ft). How will The Market value that combination? Jim Farah at Corcoran thinks it is worth $1.25mm (with maintenance of $1,364/mo).
 
It can only be worth it for someone with a serious entertaining lifestyle. Problem may be the 14th Street location (just west of Union Square; no green views, apparently) and the fact that the roof terrace is on top of (only) a 5-story building, No pix of the Empire State Building, and no telling without being there how much of a ‘canyon’ this rooftop glory may be.
 
But if you had the lifestyle to take advantage of the kick-ass kitchen and such large entertaining space, the 900 sq ft loft is almost a throw-in, for this much outdoor space. (Figure the loft at about $800/ft and the terrace at about $400/ft.)
 
#2C is said to be 1,500 sq ft (did they count the mezzanine?) and sold in February for $1.03mm after eight months on the market.
 
© Sandy Mattingly 2007
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , ,

Jul. 10, 2006 - I may not use it, but I really want it / what Manhattan terraces and balconies are worth

 

 Who wants a terrace? (hint: everyone)

The Times is right:

 “The funny thing about private outdoor space in the city is that some people who have it use it, others don't, but most people seem to want it regardless and are willing to pay extra for it.”

“Everybody” wants it, yes, except for some families with small children and those of us afraid of heights (both of whom shy away from balconies). And nearly everyone who wants it is willing to pay for it.

 

But who uses it depends, in large part, on whether the outdoor space is a terrace (on top of a building setback) or a balcony (literally extending from the building exterior wall), on what floor they are on, and on whether there is a lot of vehicle traffic nearby.

 

Terraces are generally larger than balconies (often by a large degree), and generally feel more secure. Because they are only where the building has setbacks, there tend to be fewer of them than balconies, which can hang off a building in as many columns as a developer wants.

 

Expensive storage space

My personal observation is that if you could look across at a line of balconies, you are very likely to see many indications that they are used rarely, if at all. You will often see bicycles, dead plants, dirty plastic patio furniture, and rusty barbecue grills or hibachis. You will see more live plants, and more clean furniture, and fewer ‘storage’ items on higher floors, and on balconies that are (relatively) protected from traffic noise and soot.

 

The data that most surprised me in the Times article was to how common outdoor space is, although commentator and smart guy Jonathan Miller is quoted with data showing they are trading less often than they had been.

 

One in ten coops or condos has outdoor space? Really??

Only 10.9 percent of all residential sales in Manhattan last year included units with some type of private outdoor space, down from 14.4 percent in 2000 and 18.3 percent in 1995, according to the appraisal company Miller Samuel. "The drop suggests that the properties with outdoor space — more likely large space like terraces and gardens — have a longer holding period and do not turn over as often," said Jonathan J. Miller, the company's president.

 

Big value, no surprise there

Commentator (smart guy) Miller provided the first hard data I have seen about values, though the data is hidden behind the “typical” label.

 

Just how much of a premium buyers can expect to pay for a patch for earth (or concrete) will vary greatly. Typically, apartments with private outdoor space get an extra 25 to 50 cents on the dollar per square foot, Mr. Miller said. (So at $1,000 a square foot, the average price of all Manhattan apartments right now, a 400-square-foot terrace could add as much as $200,000 to the price tag.)

 

I do not believe that there is “typical” outdoor space, but the range given (25 to 50 cents per dollar per square foot) is wide enough to include a wide range of spaces. 

The Times provided one concrete example, a building I have not seen.

At the Atelier, a high-rise going up on West 42nd Street, a one-bedroom with a terrace starts at around $820,000, versus $770,000 for one without a terrace; a two-bedroom with a terrace starts at $1.305 million, versus $1.145 million without, according to Elad Dror, residential director for the Moinian Group, which is developing the 46-story, 478-unit condominium.

 

© Sandy Mattingly 2006
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , , ,

Sandy Mattingly is Manhattan Loft Guy; now with The Corcoran Group (http://corcoran.com/ ; but see the disclaimer at the bottom of the page), he can be reached most easily at Sandy@ManhattanLoftGuy.com or 917.902.2491, and followed on Twitter @ManhattnLoftGuy (note "mis-spelling"). After 7+ years, the blog has moved. Links here on RealTown will work for the foreseeable future, but new posts (and all the old content) has migrated to ManhattanLoftGuy.com.

Recent Posts

ch ch ch changes September 30, 2013
diversion is more of a (small) rant about Manhattan real estate "penthouses"
50 West 29 Street build-out loft sale not as simple as it looks
28 Laight Street 1-day loft sale looks like a whisper listing
room or light? Tribeca or Chelsea? 2 lofts sold above ask at $2.645 million have different charms


RSS Blog Feed

Categories

apartment types
bubble talk
caution: no real estate content
change is a constant
economic "analysis"
general weird stuff
In the news (me)
loft features / amenities
loft features / kitchens
loft features / outdoor space
loft features / "space"
loft features / views
lofts in 'other' neighborhoods
Loft neighborhoods / Chelsea
Loft neighborhoods/ East Village
Loft neighborhoods / Flatiron
loft neighborhoods / NoHo
Loft neighborhoods / SoHo
Loft neighborhoods / Tribeca
loft neighborhoods / West 30s
lofts outside New York??
loft style
Manhattan real estate business
Market Data - aggregators
Market Data - reports
Market Trends
Marketing Manhattan apartments
New York, New York, New York
On The Market
open houses
pricing analysis
The Process - buying an apartment
Psychology of the market
public art in Manhattan
schools
truth IS stranger...
what makes a loft a "loft"
internet and blogosphere
renovation opportunities + rewards
One Bed Wonders
new this week


Favorite Links

Manhattan Users Guide (be sure to search the archives)
The Gotham Center for NYC History
Matrix the Real Estate Economy
Hopstop (door-to-door subway instructions)
MTA subway site, including maps + schedules
NYC Dept of Education site
NY State Assn of Independent Schools (find private schools)
cul-cha!
the local TriBeCa newspaper
"the weekly newspaper of lower Manhattan"
Brooklyn, but a great blog
Patell & Waterman's History of New York
The Soho Memory Project by a long-time resident
Tribeca Commons, an economist considers history, development + more
NYC Past photo tumblr
Manhattan Loft Guy Facebook page (use dropdown menu for Timeline)
the MLG Master List of loft sales, to Nov 2008
Tribeca Citizen
Malcolm Carter
Brick Underground, "vertical living demystified"
Daytonian In Manhattan a tourist's wonder with a local's eye
Urban Digs (numbers, graphs & charts, oh my)
True Gotham (very) occasional front-line dispatches
DNA Info, local news via the inter-tubes
The Real Deal, our industry rag
Coop and Condo (a lawyer writes with a funny pen)
Crain's New York real estate
Tom Fletcher’s NYC Architecture
Jeremiah’s Vanishing New York
Architakes, one guy's take
Scouting New York (location guy with camera)
Forgotten NY
Soho Alliance
Soho Journal
Chelsea Now (area news)
the essential. if ephemeral, New York
The Broadsheet Daily (especially for BPC, FiDi and Tribeca residents)
The Atlantic Cities

Links

Home
View my profile
Archives
Email Me
Blog Manager