I have changed the way I am reporting the absorption rates.  I think the numbers better show what is happening.  I have changed to showi a trailing 4 week moving average.  This removes some of the highs and lows and provides a better picture.  I have also adjusted the numbers to reflect the number of days in the reporting period.  It is not fair to compare February to August when August has 10% more days than February.  Just common sense.  Let me know what you think? 

Absorption Rates.