Los Angeles, California
Have a discussion with a Broker and Realtor(r) about various issues related to real estate. Enjoy Michael's random thoughts about Real Estate and the changing market, or what Michael likes in the Los Angeles area...
Michael works primarily in the San Fernando, Santa Clarita, and Simi Valleys and in the West Los Angeles and surrounding area of Los Angeles...
Serving your real estate needs in Encino, Tarzana, Agoura, Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Calabasas Park, Reseda, Woodland Hills, Sherman Oaks, Chatsworth, Canoga Park, West Hills, Winnetka, Northridge, Van Nuys, Studio City, Toluca Lake, Burbank, Granada Hills, Mission Hills, Arleta, Pacoima, Sylmar, Panorama City and the rest of the San Fernando Valley; Valencia, Stevenson Ranch, Saugus, Newhall, Santa Clarita, Canyon Country and the rest of the Santa Clarita Valley; Simi Valley; Moorpark; Newbury Park; Conejo Valley; Westwood, Century City, Beverly Hills, Bel Air, Santa Monica, Culver City, Mar Vista, Rancho Park, Cheviot Hills, Beverlywood, Miracle Mile, West Hollywood, and West Los Angeles. We've got your Real Estate Needs Covered!!
Site Feed
RSS Feed
|
Oct. 19, 2006
A question was posed to me and I thought it would make great blog discussion. Here is the question and my response is posted below. What do you think?
Q- The second loan on top of the original mortgage wiped out most of the equity long before the condominium was listed for sale three months ago. Recent price reductions reduce what little equity was remaining, yet the drop from $500,000 to $460,000 still has not attracted buyers. The monthly loan payments are difficult for the owner who is convinced she should walk away, giving the property back to the bank. What would you tell her? What are the tax, financial, and personal implications of defaulting on the loans?
A- Walking away is certainly an option but not one that I would necessarily recommend. From a tax perspective, should the lender agree to a short sale, any “forgiven” loan amounts could be reported as taxable income to the IRS on a 1099, resulting in a large tax liability (with some exceptions; consult your tax advisor for more details and guidance); a foreclosure is more damaging to a personal credit profile than a short sale (neither of which are particularly good), so exploring a short sale would be worthwhile, provided it could be made to work for all parties.
The damage to the seller’s personal credit report would follow her for a number of years, although some mortgage lenders would potentially look past it in a couple to a few years’ time depending on other credit factors.
Obviously, the best solution would be to sell the property as listed and try to extricate the owner from the situation. A short sale or a foreclosure should be the last resort for any seller. In some cases, selling to a “fast cash” type of organization may be an option, but any sale would likely be far below market value and the seller may walk away without any profit (but this would still be better than a foreclosure or a short sale in most cases).
Any discussion about a short sale or foreclosure should be handled by an agent or broker with knowledge of the ramifications from a real estate perspective, and clients should be strongly advised to seek competent tax and/or legal advice for ramifications involving either or both areas.
Sep. 6, 2006
I thought this was a very interesting article. This article is by Blanche Evans from Realty Times can be found at http://realtytimes.com/rtapages/20060831_zillowed.htm.
Aug. 7, 2006
Categorized in: Real Estate
When A Great View Is Not A Great View
By:
Raynor
House hunting is a game wherein you try to get the most while paying the least. Part of getting the most is often finding a home with a view, but don’t be a sucker.
When A Great View Is Not A Great View
After a hard days work, you come home to your dream home. You change into something comfortable, grab a beverage and head out to the deck. There, you relax and take in your fabulous view. This is the daydream you have while standing in a home for sale that has an incredible view. Yes, it is a nice view. In fact, it may be so nice that you do not really pay attention to the rest of the home. Even if you do, you may be able to overlook some problems that you would not otherwise if there was no view. At the end of the day, you make an offer and the seller accepts.
Sixty days later, you are the owner, moved in, unpacked and enjoying your new property. After a year or so, you come home after a stressful day. You change clothes, grab a beverage and head out to the deck. You are stunned to see a two-story home being built in the middle of your view.
How can this be? This is an outrage! Unfortunately, you probably are out of luck. Depending on your state laws, you may have no way of keeping the other property owner from spoiling your view.
As you might expect, this situation arises more often than people would like to admit. When considering making an offer on a home, one must be very careful when it comes to views. You should never dismiss other problems with the home because you like a view. Further, you should not overvalue the view.
A beautiful view today may just be a view of the side of a home in a year. Investigate local legal regulations regarding new construction in the area, the height homes can be built to and whether pre-existing homes can add second or third floors. If you do not, you run the risk of owning the room without a view.
Article Source http://www.articledashboard.com
Raynor James is with the site - FSBOAmerica.org - http://www.fsboamerica.org/buyer.com
|