Real Estate Blog for Palo Alto, Mountain View, California, and Surrounding Communities
• Archives
August 2007
• Aug. 15, 2007 - Reap the Benefits (or Pay the Piper) When you Sell Your Home
|
When congress revised the tax laws in 1997 and offered a $250,000 per owner tax exemption for profits realized on the sale of a principal residence, they clearly didn’t live in this area. What was intended as a bonus for home sellers in most parts of the country actually discourages some owners in this area from selling their homes, and that may be part of the reason for our chronic inventory shortage in this area. Here is an example.
Let’s say a hypothetical couple, the Browns, purchased their principal residence, a 2 story colonial, for $300,000 in the early 1990’s. That same home may be worth $1,500,000 (probably more) by now. If the couple wants to move from a 2 story home to a single story home of the same value, they may be in trouble. Even after they deduct the original cost of the home plus the purchase and selling expenses from their selling price, their profit would be at least 1,100,000. Each person (assuming they had lived in the home for at least 2 of the last 5 years) is entitled to a $250,000 tax exemption. So, they would deduct a total of $500,000 from their profit and owe tax on $600,000. At the long term capital gain tax rate of 15%, they would owe $90,000 in taxes. Their purchasing power has been substantially decreased. If their replacement home costs the same as the one they are selling, they would have to take out a larger mortgage, or did into their savings, to be able to complete the transaction.
There is another potential tax complication that sometimes makes their turnover even more difficult. Most of the time, their property taxes will be based on the purchase price of their new home. At a base rate of 1%, they will now owe $1,250 per month in property taxes as opposed to approximately $375, allowing for inflation, on their older home with the same market value. As a result, many empty nesters feel trapped in their older homes. They don’t want their property taxes to nearly triple each month, and they don’t want to carry a larger mortgage than what they had in their older home.
One thing they should keep in mind is a once in a lifetime allowance for sellers over 55 years of age to transfer the tax base of the house they are selling to the one they are buying if they purchase a home of less value (even $1 less!!) than the one they are selling. This applies if they buy their replacement home before closing on the one they are selling. If they close on the one they are selling first, they are entitled to this exemption as long as the cost of the replacement home does not exceed 105% of the one they sold if they purchase within one year, or 110% if they purchased within the second year after selling. After the second year their ability to carry over their tax base disappears completely. And it is only available in certain counties. Fortunately Santa Clara County is one of these! And a very few counties also allow qualifying buyers from another county to bring their old tax base with them. This can make a huge difference in the decision to downsize for qualifying couples or individuals.
The $250,000 per person tax exemption on the profits from the sale of a principal residence is not always a bad thing. I have several clients who have moved into a rental property they owned, lived there 2 years to qualify for the exemption, and then sold the property. They can do this every 2 years, so if they own another rental property after selling the first, they can then move into that, live there for another 2 years, and then sell it. I know one couple who has done this 4 times already, each time pocketing $500,000 free and clear of taxes. It makes for a great retirement fund!!
And here is one more tactic used by savvy investors to purchase their dream retirement home. If they have a rental property they have owned for a long time, they would probably owe a substantial tax if they sold it outright. However, they can defer the taxes by exchanging it for the home they want to retire to, rent that out for at least a year or two (to establish it as a legitimate investment property) and then move into it themselves, thereby converting it into their principal residence.
If you are interested in utilizing any of these strategies to save on taxes and profit from property you presently own, please do contact me. This is not meant to be a comprehensive explanation of the current tax laws, which are quite complicated, and consultation with a tax professional is always advised.
For additional information, you may visit the following websites:
|
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Tax Exemptions, Minimizing Taxes |
• Aug. 4, 2007 - New Lending Guidelines and Potential Effect on Local Market
|
We have all heard about the crisis in the sub prime mortgage business. Sub prime loans are loans that are approved for borrowers with less than stellar qualifications. During the past few years, when we were experiencing rapid property appreciation in most markets, lenders loosened their underwriting requirements for almost all borrowers, including those who fell into the “sub prime” category. Frequently there would be an outrageously low initial interest rate, thereby allowing the borrower to qualify for a larger loan, and this was often coupled with a low or no down purchase requirement.
The problem with all of these loans is that whenever the initial lower rate expires, the interest rate will increase, frequently to more than the borrower can afford. Lenders who had been counting on rapid appreciation to allow borrowers to refinance their high interest 100% loans to a lower interest rate 80% loan were suddenly finding that the value of the property was the same or may even have decreased instead of increasing, and borrowers were suddenly unable to make their payments or refinance into the more favorable loan situation. In many areas the result is a glut of properties on the market, thereby lowering prices even more.
Up until recently, this did not directly affect our local market environment very much, except in the lowest priced neighborhoods, as our chronic inventory shortage continued and ever anxious buyers were still willing to compete for whatever homes they were interested in and pay over asking price in most cases. However, all of that may be changing.
In response to the sub prime crisis that has affected so much of the country and parts of California, many lenders recently tightened their underwriting criteria for almost all borrowers. No longer will they qualify buyers at the lower introductory rate, but at the fully indexed rate. 100% stated income loans, where the lender relies on the income statement of the borrower without documentary confirmation (almost always reserved for the most qualified borrowers) have all but disappeared. FICO score requirements have been tightened. Interest only loans may no longer be qualified at the interest-only payment but are now qualified at the fully indexed and fully amortized amount (as if the borrower is paying principal as well as interest.) In other words, it suddenly has become more difficult for even highly qualified borrowers to obtain the mortgage they may be looking for, and they will qualify for less in many cases.
What does that mean for us, in this isolated island of real estate madness? Well, it may mean fewer buyers for any individual home on the market. People who may have qualified to buy a $2.5 million home may now only qualify for a $2 million home. Buyers who may have been preapproved earlier this year may be in for a big shock if they rely on that preapproval figure to purchase a home now. All buyers should review their qualifications with their particular lender to makes sure they haven’t been bumped into a slightly lower price range.
So far there has been no noticeable change in our market because of these changes, but the changes are very recent and not fully implemented. The jury is out, but sellers must know that the market landscape may shift somewhat over the summer months. Buyers must know that their purchasing power may be diminished. They may be able to mitigate this with a 40 year as opposed to a 30 year mortgage, but they need to check. Real estate agents must alert their clients to the most recent changes and be pro active in advising their clients as to their best strategy in this new environment. |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Sub Prime Crisis, New Lending Guidelines, Loans |
|
|
|
Selling real estate in the mid San Francisco peninsula is unlike selling real estate in any other area. Just as the geographical area is famous for its microclimates, the real estate landscape has its own microclimates, each with its own idiosyncracies. An experienced agent will be in tune with the subtle variations from one subarea to another. But it is always changing. In this blog I will attempt to capture some items of interest to buyers and sellers alike, and to have some fun as well (see ""Fun Stuff"). If you have information you would like to have posted on this website, please email your suggestios to Lmercer@Lmercer.com.
Links
• Home
• View my profile
• Archives
• Email Me
• Blog Manager
|
PageEntry 1 of 1
Last Page | Next Page
|
|