Real Estate Blog for Palo Alto, Mountain View, California, and Surrounding Communities
• Sep. 18, 2008 - Coldwell Banker Raises More Than $191,000 for Habitat for Humanity
This year's Coldwell Banker Northern California fundraising event for Habitat for Humanity has raised another $191,000 for this noble cause. This was our 10th annual fund raiser and we have raised a total of $1.75 million over those 10 years to assist those who might not otherwise be able to afford it to purchase and own their own home. Funds are raised through special events (our office had a cake sale), raffles, and solicitation. Many agents purchase raffle ticket and donate them in the name of their clients to help to raise funds. Some offices also assit on building days. Congratulations Coldwell Banker!! All monies rased will go towards our local Habitat for Humanity chapter in 2009. Additional upcoming charity events include One Warm Coat and Toys for Tots over the holidays. Coldwell banker offices will have collection boxes available. |
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Coldwell Banker Fund Raising, Habitat For Humanity |
• Aug. 21, 2008 - What is Wrong With This Picture?

Well, a couple of things! First and most obvious is the fact that our rainy season is just around the corner. Although it doesn’t usually start in earnest until November, it can and does rain in September. I know this for a fact!! When I moved to this area in September 1972, it rained almost every day, or so it seemed. Remember the song “They say it never rains in California.” I believed it!! So it was not quite what I expected. A prudent person would think seriously about finishing off this roof job.
The other, less obvious issue is this: Most people think that the tiles or shingles or shakes are what keeps the roof water tight. That is incorrect. It is the tar paper under the roof covering that keeps the roof water tight. The tiles, shingles, shakes, or even gravel if you have a tar and gravel roof, are there to protect the paper from the sun, which would otherwise rot the paper and destroy the water barrier it provides.
The house in this picture has been under construction for more than a year. Early this year they installed the roof…. all but the corner you see in the photo. It has been like that ever since. They have worked all around it… installing windows, finishing and painting the walls, landscaping, hardscaping. It seems that patch of roof is going to be the last thing finished, and it has been sitting, exposed to the sun for months and months. I would not buy that house without at least a 5 year guarantee (although a guarantee is absolutely no good if the builder goes out of business.)
A word to the wise:
- If you already own your home, have the roof inspected now, before it starts to rain. Roofers are hard to find in a downpour, as they are then working in emergency mode;
- If you buy a newly constructed home, buy from a reputable builder who has been in business for a long time. That builder is more experienced, and is also less likely to disappear overnight and leave you holding the bag if defects are discovered after escrow closes.
|
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Roof Defects, What Causes A Roof Leak |
• Aug. 16, 2008 - The Trap Door Springs Shut!!
On several occasions I have written about how some of my clients have amassed a tidy retirement fund by moving into rental properties they owned, living there at least 2 years to establish those homes as their own personal residences, and then selling them and keeping $250,000 of their profit for a single person or $500,000 for a married couple, tax free, as long as they living in the home at least 2 of the 5 years immediately preceding the sale. I have clients who have done this as many as 4 times, thus accumulating $2 million, tax free, towards their retirement.
Well, that was then, and this is now. The tax reformers on Capitol Hill have taken notice of this huge tax loophole and they are shutting it down. For properties purchased after Jan. 1, 2009, the rules for rental properties that are later converted into personal residences have changed. The new rules factor in the number of years you have rented the property and discount that factor from the tax exemption.
Here is an example:On Jan. 2, 2009 you purchase a second home or investment property. You rent out the property for 8 years, then move into it and live there for 2 years. Towards the end of the second year, you put the property up for sale and close escrow right at the end of your 2 year eligibility period. So, for all intents and purposes you owned the property for 10 years, rented it for 8 of those 10, and then lived in it for 2. Let’s say your profit (basically what you sold it for less what you paid for it, buying and selling expenses, and capital improvements) is $120,000. During the rental period you wrote off $20,000 in depreciation.
Under the old rules the $20,000 you depreciated during the rental period would be treated as gross income. All of the remaining $100,000 profit would be tax free. Under the new rules, the $20,000 would still be treated as gross income (no change there.) But only a portion of the remaining $100,000 would be tax free, depending on how long you rented the property vs. how long you used it as your personal residence. The rest will be taxed as capital gains.
To calculate how much falls into each category, divide the number of years that you did not live in the property (8 years) by the number of years you owned the property. In this case that would be 8/10 or 80% of $100,000. That amount ($80,000) is subject to capital gains treatment. Only the remaining 20% ($20,000) will be completely tax free. (This assumes that you lived in the property 2 of the 5 years immediately preceding the sale, as in this example. It does not have to be the 2 years immediately preceding the sale.)
If you move into the rental property and never sell it during your lifetime, there is no problem. But if you are thinking of buying property in an area you think you want to retire to you really should do it NOW. In many areas of the country it is a solid buyer’s market, a great opportunity to purchase property while prices are low and there is plenty to choose from. Eventually appreciation will kick back in and by the time you retire your dream home may be out of reach. But don’t wait until next year. If you do move there as planned and you change your mind later, for any reason, it can make a huge difference in how much money you can walk away with!!
*** I am not a tax professional. There are several unanswered questions her. For example, rental usage prior to January 2009 is grandfathered into the current rules, but what happens, for example, if you already own rental property. Is future usage also grandfathered in? Please consult with a tax professional before deciding on a course of action.
© Lynne Mercer, August 16, 2008
|
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: New Tax Rules, Tax Treatment Sale Of Personal Residence, Tax Loophol Slammed Shut |
• Jul. 28, 2008 - Where is the Deposit Check?
A recent sales contract provided for the buyer's deposit check to be deposited to the escrow holder's account within 3 days of ratifying the contract. The third day after ratification happened to be on a Monday. By Thursday that week I still did not have a receipt from the title company handling the escrow for the deposit, so I phoned to ask them to send one for my file. Much to my surprise, they did not have the deposit. I called the buyer's agent to find out what was going on and she said the buyer decided to use a different account ,so she had returned the original deposit check to the buyer and she would get the replacement in "by the end of the week." My response: Not good enough.
When a client hands their agent a deposit check, they are entrusting the agent to handle it appropriately. They are "trust funds." There are very strict rules about handling trust funds and there is absolutely no excuse for not knowing this, because every agent in California is required to complete a refresher course on "Trust Fund Handling" every 4 years. Failure to handle trust funds correctly is one of the leading reasons for agents to lose their license. Just because the buyer wanted to replace the check with a different one does not suspend the contractual obligation to get the deposit check (either the original check or a substitute check) into escrow within the time frame specified in the contract. This agent was completely unaware of her responsibilities or the seriousness of the matter.
In this case the agent listened to what I was saying and hand delivered the check to the escrow holder by late Thursday afternoon. No harm done in this case, but there could have been serious issues if the buyer had decided to back out of the contract, for example. With no deposit, how would the seller be able to claim damages? This is the stuff that lawsuits are made of, and everybody knows how quickly almost any little thing in California can escalate into a lawsuit. For heaven's sake agents, remember that this is not a parlor game we are playing. Our responsibilites as agents are serious and the potential consequences for negligence of this sort can be enormous. |
Comments (2) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Deposit Checks And Trust Fund Accounting |
• Jul. 24, 2008 - Counteroffer Limbo: How would you handle this?
Real estate can be a tricky business. Recently I listed a home that was part of a probate. The administrator lived on the east coast and we decided to collect all offers by a certain time on a certain date. The plan was that I would email all of the offers to my client. She would review them overnight and we would convene via conference call Thurs. morning to decide how to respond to the offers. I made this all clear to everybody who expressed an interest in the property. On the appointed day we got 4 offers. Two other agents had also expressed an interest, so I called them back to see if their clients were still interested or if they had decided not to proceed. One client had backed off, but the other agent (agent X) said his client was still interested but they couldn't meet to write up the offer until that evening. I told him to go ahead and get it to me Thursday morning so we would consider it along with the offers we had already received. Fast forward to Thursday morning. I have no phone message and no email from agent X, so I called him to see if his clients had written an offer. He responded that they decided not to. So, my clients and I reviewed the offers in hand. As is the norm in this area, the offers were "clean," meaning either all cash (with evidence of funds provided with the offer) or preapproved with no contingency for financing, no contingencies of any kind, "as is" and a fast (10 day) close of escrow. My client decided to accept the highest offer at the price offered, but with a small counter asking for a slightly longer escrow to give the tenants time to over out. So far, so good. We sent the counteroffer to the buyer, who was thrilled and ready to sign, when the phone rang. It was agent X to say his clients had decided to write an offer after all and they really, really wanted the house and could do it right away and all he needed was a figure that would guarantee that they would get it!! Well, first of all we already had a counter out, and if the buyer signed and sent it back (which they were already in the process of doing) the house would already be sold. If my clients wanted to work with this new buyer, they would have to rescind the counteroffer immediately and get some acknowledgement from the buyer that they received the rescission, before accepting another offer. Secondly, we had signed a confidentiality agreement, agreeing not disclose the price and terms of the offer we were working with prior to close of escrow. But agent X stated that we wouldn't have to actually disclose the price of the other offfer, just give them a price that is higher. He insisted that I call my client to let her make the decision. Fair enough. Fortunately I have a sensible seller. It was a no brainer for her. She noted that these new buyers had already changed their minds twice and there was no guarantee that they wouldn't do so again, whereas the people she had sent the counter to had stepped up to the plate without hesitation and they obviously really wanted the house too. The price they offered was very good (competing offers, don't forget.) She was happy and did not want to risk losing a solid, committed buyer for a "flakey" (her words, not mine) buyer. Another seller may have reacted differently. Having a buyer ask for the price they needed implies they will go even higher than any of the other offers. A greedy seller may have been willing to take that risk. But it is a big risk with the potential for a big lawsuit down the line. First, the previous buyer may refuse to acknowledge the rescission and send back the signed counteroffer instead. Now what do you do? You would have to prove that they received the rescission in the first place and then signed and returned the counter after they received it. Secondly, even if they acknowledged the rescission, they would be hopping mad and maybe walk away even if the new offer doesn't pan out, and thirdly, there is no guarantee that agent X's clients will come in with the price and terms requested. So, the seller could end up losing a perfectly good buyer and gaining a less desirable buyer. What would you have done? Every seller wants the best price and the best terms they can get. But there is a no man's land between the time a counteroffer is sent out and the time it is signed and returned, or rejected. My client took the safe route and stayed with what she had. She even sent me a written instruction that she did not want to look at any other offers unless something happened with the one she was working on and it did not go forward as expected. The price she received is at the high end of what she was hoping for. She is happy, and she doesn't have to worry about potential lawsuits down the line. What would you do in the same situation? |
Comments (5) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Counteroffer Limbo, Multiple Offer Dilemma |
|
|
|
Selling real estate in the mid San Francisco peninsula is unlike selling real estate in any other area. Just as the geographical area is famous for its microclimates, the real estate landscape has its own microclimates, each with its own idiosyncracies. An experienced agent will be in tune with the subtle variations from one subarea to another. But it is always changing. In this blog I will attempt to capture some items of interest to buyers and sellers alike, and to have some fun as well (see ""Fun Stuff"). If you have information you would like to have posted on this website, please email your suggestios to Lmercer@Lmercer.com.
Links
• Home
• View my profile
• Archives
• Email Me
• Blog Manager
|
|