Feb. 6, 2008
I've been wrestling with the question lately about how to use the visual tools available to advertise listings.
First of all, there's absolutely no question that high quality photographs are essential to marketing a listing. The National Association of REALTORS (NAR) own numbers show that listings with six or more photos are viewed 299% more often than those with fewer. That's a very significant number! Which makes you wonder why another study by NAR shows that only 23% of its members own a digital camera! But I digress!
And, don't underestimate the importance of the quality of those photographs. I'm always amazed when I see photos of cluttered countertops and piles of dirty clothes in the middle of the floor! Most of us have heard for years about the importance of curb appeal. It's been important because it was the first impression the potential buyer had of your home. But now that first impression is online. Curb appeal now applies to the whole house!
Virtual tours have become important, although I suspect that, like me, most buyers find it easier to just look at a large number of photos without all the pretty music and panning back and forth!
Now we're starting to see some videos incorporated into some listings. To be honest, what passes for videos is, for the most part, nothing more than a slide show narrated by the agent with maybe a few seconds showing the agent talking. Again, really what you're getting are just photographs of the home but in a format suitable for putting on YouTube.
It's too early for there to be any hard numbers on the effectiveness of this form of advertising. But I am wondering if buyers find it any more useful than a large number of high quality still photographs.
So...I'm asking for your input. What's your preference? Do you want a YouTube movie with a series of narrated slides? Are still photographs just as effective? More effective? If you're a buyer, what works for you?
Thanks for helping me figure this out!