Amissville, Virginia
An ongoing dialog on real estate news, opinion and trends in Northern Virginia and the greater Piedmont area.
Site Feed
RSS Feed
|
Nov. 2, 2008
Categorized in: Mortgages
FIRST THINGS FIRST!
IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY...GO VOTE!
I know I've missed Halloween, but if you're still in the mood for something scary, this article definitely fits the bill.
If you don't have time for the full article basically it says we're approaching a record 20% of all homeowners underwater on their mortgages nationally.
Headed into a recession, that's pretty scary. If you lose your job and need to sell your home, what do you do? If you get transferred by your employer and need to sell your home, what do you do?
There is a downward spiral here that someone has to find a way to stop. More foreclosures lead to lower prices which lead to more homeowners under water on their mortgages which leads to more foreclosures when "stuff" happens.
Today's election, whatever the result will not fix everything. But it'll be interesting to see what, if anything, government tries to do on this front in the next few months.
Jul. 8, 2008
When I want to show a listing to a buyer, I use a lockbox to enter the house. Typically, in this area (Prince William, Fauquier, Culpeper, Rappahannock and Warren counties) that generally means an electronic lockbox that often looks like this: 
To access this box and get the house key out, I use an electronic device that's been updated with a special code within the last 24 hours. It's an extra level of protection for the homeowner in case my "ekey" is stolen. Within 24 hours it's essentially worthless unless you know my passwords in order to get it updated. The other advantage of this lockbox is that I know who has shown my listings. If something is missing, left unlocked, etc. I likely know who to track down to ask about the problem. There have always been a few holdouts who still used combination (combo) lockboxes: 
These boxes require only an alpha or numeric code in order to open them and access the key. If I know the combination I could, theoretically, give that information to someone else and that's all they'd need to access the keys to your home. It's a less secure method of access. The advantage in some agents' eyes is that if someone from outside our area wants to show the house, there's no problem if they don't use the same lockbox system used in this area. With the large number of foreclosures in our area, we're seeing a big increase in the use of these combination lockboxes. Most banks will mandate that a combo box be used on their listings. I've had trouble coming up with a good reason for this. The only thing I can think of is that they want bank personnel to be able to access the property if necessary, without a real estate agent present. I was troubled this week to learn that a local agent had mentioned that if he's unable to show a home when his buyer clients want to see it and he can't find any other agent to cover for him, he'll simply give his clients the combination and let them go in the house on their own. Hmmmmm! The number of reasons this is a bad idea is very long. The liability to the agent should anything go wrong, is huge. It could be that his clients are good people with the best of intentions but they have trouble getting the keys back into the lockbox. It happens all the time. It is, of course, highly unprofessional and, I'd suggest, unethical. The listing agent should definitely be making a phone call to the agent's broker at the very least, to protest this behavior. By the way, when the agent was confronted with what a bad idea this was the response was "Everybody does it." I never got that one by my Mom. And, I'm not buying it now!
Mar. 31, 2008
Categorized in: Mortgages
In the Fauquier Times Democrat Weekend paper, I'm quoted in two separate articles. The first one "Few Find Escape From Threat of Foreclosure" is on page one and continues throughout the paper. The second, "By The Numbers" is on page 3.
The second article is basically information taken from one of last week's blogs. No problems there.
The problem is in the front page article. First of all, thanks to Laura Ruby for putting this together. It's good to see local coverage on this, along with some helpful information. But, there are some inaccuracies in the article that I'd like to address.
Dave Bryan says that "97 percent of homeowners facing foreclosure will, in fact, lose their homes, leaving only three percent who are able to actually come to some sort of agreement with their loan servicer."
I've spent hours trying to verify that number. I can find no documentation to support it. I finally called Laura Ruby to find out if Dave had cited a source when giving her that quote. He said "he had read it somewhere."
So, just let me say that after trying NAR, Mortgage Bankers Association and realtytrac.com and being unable to verify that number, I have serious reservations about it. My experience is that the number is nowhere near that bad. And, I'm concerned because I don't want families to think it's hopeless!
I then made calls to agents, lenders and organizations designed to help people with these issues. No one had specific numbers. But no one believed that the numbers were anywhere near this grim.
Keep trying! It is not hopeless. Every situation is different!
Another paragraph says "When homeowners have a second mortgage, short sales are virtually impossible, as that requires the approval of two loan servicers."
A first and second mortgage certainly make things even harder. But I've successfully done short sales with two mortgages. Again, it's not impossible. But you've got to be willing to take on the battle!
The last piece in here that I disagree with is from Dave Bryan again. "If you get behind two or three months, it's too late. You won't be able to sell it before it goes to foreclosure."
Again, absolutely not true! In fact, you can't do a short sale until you are behind on paying your mortgage! Again, I've done this for clients and it's worked! You do have to very aggressively price your home. If the home languishes on the market for months, eventually it will move into foreclosure. Then you'll have lost that window of opportunity. And, some short sale homes are in such terrible condition that it's tough to price them low enough to find someone interested. But I'd never say it's impossible!
My big concern here is that not enough homeowners are seeking help now because they feel overwhelmed and hopeless. They need to reach out for help early. But most importantly, they need to get help, whether it's early or not! There are very few times I walk away from someone and tell them there's no hope!
Ask for help. Be aggressive! Don't take "no" for an answer! I can't guarantee anyone a win every time, but your odds are a lot better!
Mar. 4, 2008
REALTORS belong to local, state and national associations of REALTORS. While these groups serve the interests of real estate agents and the industry, they also do an awful lot of good things for homeowners. I don't think most homeowners are even aware these associations exist, much less what benefits they might provide them.
First of all, these associations provide training for real estate agents. This is a critical piece of their mission and it's important to buyers and sellers of real estate. The better educated your agent, the more likely you are to have a smooth transaction. Education doesn't eliminate the problems that can arise in any real estate purchase or sale. But it does help provide the expertise to the agent on how to deal with issues.
The associations also educate lawmakers. Whether it's providing input on how extending the size of the historical district might affect home values, or explaining the impact that new transaction fees will have on the Virginia real estate market or laying out for those in national government what might work to help stem the tide of foreclosures, these associations provide a very useful service.
They also educate homeowners. Whether it's through the information on the VAR (Virginia Association of REALTORS) or NAR (National Association of REALTORS) web sites or through newspaper articles and editorials, they help get the word out about changing real estate laws, how to buy or sell a home and a host of more specific topics.
There are a lot of good things happening behind the scenes with these groups. Don't ignore the help they can provide!
Dec. 6, 2006
Three local jurisdictions made moves yesterday to limit growth as a way of controlling the increasingly out of control traffic in our area. Or, in the case of Loudon County and Prince William County in Virginia, they hoped to send a message to the Commonwealth that the time has come for action on the issues of traffic, infrastructure and mass transit.
Loudon County and Prince William County are two of the fastest growing counties in the nation. You'd be hard pressed to find a local who feels good about that. From the increase in gridlock to the higher taxes to pay for infrastructure, local residents are yelling "enough already"!
The question isn't whether a problem exists. It clearly does. The real question is whether their efforts to slow that growth by delaying future housing development is going to fix it. By itself, these moves won't do much of anything. Passing these pieces of legislation won't take a single car off the road tomorrow or next month or even next year. It may slow down how much additional traffic is added in future years. But with infrastructure already years behind current needs, that's small comfort.
The only way these measures are effective is if they produce action in Richmond to remedy this situation. Odds of that aren't great, despite clear signs in the most recent elections that in Northern Virginia this is a pressing voter issue. But Virginia's delegates don't always agree on either the problem or the solution. Compromise will be needed by all parties and it's yet to be seen whether either political party has the sense to put aside partisan bickering and get something accomplished.
What do you think? Will these latest measures to slow or limit growth make any difference? What are the effects likely to be, intended or otherwise? I look forward to your input!
Aug. 13, 2006
I wanted to devote at least one entry to that subject that no client ever asks me about, selling your house on your own. This is commonly known as For Sale By Owner (FSBO) in the industry. And the reason no one ever asks me about this is because they believe they know my answer!
But the truth is always more complicated than is comfortable. It's heresy to say this in the real estate world, but I believe there are occasions where it can be perfectly sensible to sell your own home without the involvement of a licensed agent. Furthermore, before I ever became a REALTOR or even thought about it, my husband and I sold our first home on our own. We had a ratified contract in less than 48 hours for more than asking price and, in fact, had a bidding war. So, I know it can be done!
Let me also say, that, generally, it's not for everyone. Most people who decide to sell their own homes do so without little or no knowledge or preparation. That's probably why statistics say that on average, FSBOs sell for 16% less than homes sold by a licensed agent.
One of the reasons our experience was good is because I chronically over-prepare! I bought just about every book there was about selling your own home and then did just about everything they recommended! We were also in a very hot sellers market in a very desirable neighborhood where there was no other inventory currently for sale. And we knew this going in because we did our homework. The odds were in our favor! Obviously, that's not always the case!
So, here are some questions to ask yourself if you're contemplating doing this on your own:
1. Are you willing to invest the time to research current market conditions so you can set the price properly?
2. Are you willing to educate yourself about the process and follow the advice of the experts?
3. Do you have a good real estate attorney to assist you with the settlement and perhaps help you review the contract?
4. Are you able to make your home available to potential buyers seven days a week, at least 10 hours/day?
5. Are you (and your spouse!) able to conduct negotiations in a calm, business-like manner and set aside your emotional attachment to your home?
6. Are you able to wait longer for your home to sell than one listed by a real estate agent?
7. Are you comfortable with a higher degree of legal risk?
8. Is the current market one where you will only need minimal market exposure in order to sell?
If all of the above are answered in the affirmative, it may be worth it to try the FSBO route! But don't tell any other agents I said that!!!
|