Welcome to the New RealTown! Submit Feedback
Member Login | Join RealTown

Piedmont Real Estate Blog

Blog by Julie Emery
Amissville, Virginia

An ongoing dialog on real estate news, opinion and trends in Northern Virginia and the greater Piedmont area.

Subscribe

Your E-mail Address:
Subscribe to:

Recent Comments

RE: Foreclosures Frozen
 I would also encourage people to get out and...
RE: JK Moving & Storage
Hi, Good job… This inform...
RE: Local Food Sources
I truly enjoyed reading this article.  Last J...
RE: Bingo Night in Amissville
Everyone like Bingo party  ...
RE: Bingo Night in Amissville
http://serenityatjuanita.com/...

Site Feed

RSS Feed

Piedmont Real Estate Blog

FHA Mortgages

Apr. 2, 2008
Categorized in: Mortgages

We're seeing a few more FHA mortgages this year. They had fallen out of favor during the boom years. And, for buyers it's a great thing that they're back.

The benefits to buyers are a reduced requirement for down payment (3%), lower loan costs, easier qualification and, some additional home inspection protection.

There are some down sides if you're a seller, however.

The big one is the FHA appraisal. This is not your standard appraisal where the appraiser is looking at the market value of the home. It is that; but it is also another home inspection. A transaction can sail right through the home inspection contingency with no issues. Then the FHA appraiser looks at the house and decide that there's a problem that MUST BE FIXED before settlement can occur.

Unlike with the normal home inspection, this is not a negotiation. If the seller finds himeself unwilling or unable to complete these repairs, the deal is usually dead.

The home inspector may have thought the roof was in perfectly good condition. The FHA appraiser can decide that the roof needs to be replaced.

If you're the buyer, this can be terrific. The FHA is trying to prevent you from having to buy a new roof shortly after you've bought a home.

If you're the seller, you may not be as thrilled.

The other, much smaller issue, is that there are some fees associated with a settlement that the FHA will not allow a buyer to pay. Typically these are small amounts and I've never seen this jeapordize a transaction.

You can see why, when houses sold like hot cakes, it was hard for anyone to buy a home with an FHA mortgage. If there are several offers, I'd likely advise my seller client to choose the non-FHA offer.

Still, in this market, if the only offer you've got is one with an FHA mortgage, I'd say grab it and keep your fingers crossed!

Junk Fees

Feb. 20, 2007
Categorized in: Sellers

Junk fees are certainly not unique to real estate! If you've bought a car lately you know what I'm talking about.

There's been a fair amount of discussion about the junk fees you might see from lenders. But the junk fees that come from the real estate company are not as much discussed.

Most real estate companies are now charging something called an Administrative Fee or something similar. The amounts of these fees vary widely, but in general are probably somewhere between $200 and $500. How they're structured varies with the real estate company. In some companies, the company sets a fixed amount. In others, there's a base amount and the real estate agent is allowed to tack on extra dollars and keep those in their own pocket. And there are some companies that have no fee, but whose agents can choose how much they'd like to charge and keep that money.

Now, on the buyer's side I can see some justification for this fee. Believe it or not, real estate companies margins are, by and large, pretty thin. And there is a cost for processing the paperwork associated with a buyer's contract. And, the income, in many cases, is less certain on the buyer's side.

However, it seems to me impossible to justify the charge to the seller. How do I say "So, Mr. & Mrs. Seller, that 6% commission is just not quite enough and I'm going to charge you an additional $300." Talk about nickel and diming someone! I've heard all the proposed dialogues on how to present this to your clients. But wrong is wrong and there's no way to justify this fee in my mind. Yes, you'll get some sellers to swallow it. But just because they'll agree doesn't make it right!

Since the company I am currently affiliated with insists on charging this fee, I eat it myself. It seems like the right thing to do for my clients.

So, if the listing agent you're working with is talking about an additional fee on top of whatever their commission might be, it would be a good idea to ask them what it's for!

Word of the Day Ask the Experts Question of the Day