Welcome to the New RealTown! Submit Feedback
Member Login | Join RealTown
The Real Estate Network

Piedmont Real Estate Blog

Blog by Julie Emery
Amissville, Virginia

An ongoing dialog on real estate news, opinion and trends in Northern Virginia and the greater Piedmont area. Julie is an Associate Broker at Century 21 New Millennium, 5451 Old Alexandria Turnpike, Warrenton, VA 20187

Subscribe

Your E-mail Address:
Subscribe to:

Recent Comments

RE: Tax Credit Local Impact
 Let's not forget the interest rate factor. D...
RE: Foreclosures Frozen
Going out and learning the inventory is key. Even...
RE: Let it Expire
 Please dont hope for this to expire. My fian...
RE: What if That's All There Is?
Never walk away from equity...
RE: Finding a Good Contractor
Finding the best contractor is always a big proble...

Site Feed

RSS Feed

Piedmont Real Estate Blog

The Appraisal Mess

Aug. 21, 2009
Categorized in: Business of Real Estate

If you're involved in the real estate business or are a buyer or seller right now you probably are well aware of the appraisal mess. If you haven't gotten a taste of this yet, here's what all the fuss is about.

In an effort to make appraisals more objective and keep lenders from twisting the arms of appraisers to get higher values, new rules were rolled out this year from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Instead of a local lender calling a local appraiser, they must now call a clearinghouse who will then subcontract to an appraiser.

While the idea of keeping arms length relationship sounds good, there have been some big hiccups with this new process. Appraisers are coming from far, far away to appraise in neighborhoods they know nothing about. Just today I met an appraiser at a listing I have in Culpeper. The appraiser drove several hours from Maryland to do the appraisal.

This has resulted in wildly inaccurate appraisals. And it's slowed the process down, because there's now an extra layer there.

The other thing an extra layer does is add extra cost. The new clearinghouses want to make money off of the appraisal too. So they raise the fees they charge, increasing the cost of the appraisal to the buyer. But at the same time they've lowered what they pay the actual appraiser. Guess how many of the best appraisers want to work for these clearinghouses?

There's a movement in Congress right now to suspend these rules temporarily until some kind of fix can be found for the more egregious problems. Meanwhile, if you're waiting on an appraisal, whether you're a seller or a buyer, be prepared for bad news! And, remember that if there are issues with the appraisal, there are also potential remedies.

The Slow Down

Mar. 26, 2009
Categorized in: Mortgages

There's a new roadblock on the way to getting to settlement these days.

The number of people refinancing has skyrocketed. And, as a result banks and some of the people they rely on are overwhelmed. Appraisers are overbooked. Lenders are pushing out settlement dates to be sure they can get everything through underwriting.

There are still settlements happening in 30 days, but it's getting a lot tougher.

Interest rates won't stay at this rate forever. In fact, interest rates in the mortgage markets will jump before a lot of other interest rates do. Mortgage interest rates are very sensitive to inflation worries. With all the money being pumped into the economy, I suspect this is a pretty small window of opportunity before rates start to move back up.

But for right now, if you're buying a house talk to your lender about whether 30 days is doable. And, if you're a seller, don't be surprised to see delays on the way to settlement.

Cash Leverage

Mar. 21, 2008
Categorized in: Buyers

In the comments on a recent blog someone asked why someone who pays cash has more negotiating leverage. I answered briefly in response, but thought it made sense to cover it in more detail in a blog post.

There are several reasons you're in a stronger negotiating position if you're buying with cash.

First of all, many deals never make it to closing. Even when there's a ratified contract, that's no guarantee that the deal settles. And, over 95% of the time, deals that fall apart do so because of issues related to the buyer's financing.

If you can remove that concern for the sellers, they are likely to take a lower offer, trading price for the certainty of a closed sale.

Another factor is time. Typically right now it's about 30 days in most cases from ratified contract to settlement. The majority of that time is spent on items required by the lender. Some of those things include getting a survey, having the property appraised, verifying credit and employment for the buyers and sending the deal through underwriting. It's possible, these days, for most lenders to close much faster, say in two weeks. But in most cases if they buyers are getting a mortgage the settlement date is probably about 30 days out.

With cash, on the other hand, settlement can happen as quickly as the buyer wants. I've seen cash settlements in less than 48 hours. Mind you, I wouldn't recommend that. I think the buyer should still do a title search and a home inspection at the very least. But it does happen.

Most sellers prefer money in their pocket sooner rather than later!

And, lastly, along with buyers getting a mortgage come several related contingencies. Contracts that involve a lender typically include a contingency to make sure that the buyer can actually qualify for a mortgage. (Certainly not a sure thing these days!) There's an appraisal contingency. If the property doesn't appraise for at least the sales price, the deal may be dead. And, depending on the type of financing, there may be other contingencies and/or conditions that make a timely settlement more uncertain.

All in all, if I'm selling, I'll give a little on the price to get a cash buyer!

Declining Markets Lending Issue

Dec. 21, 2007
Categorized in: Mortgages
We have a guest blogger today, Phil Denfield from First Heritage Mortgage. Phil's always sending me tremendously useful information and this post is no exception. Thanks, Phil!
 
Phil can be reached at pdenfield@fhmtg.com pdenfeld@fhmtg.com
I have recently heard from a number of realtors who have had questions about changes in lending guidelines as they pertain to the maximum allowable financing on properties in our area.  I thought it would be appropriate to try to give you some information and clarification regarding the changes we have been alerted to and those that have already taken place.  Changes are coming almost daily in the mortgage business and as we look ahead to next year.  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have recently announced changes to their guidelines for loans made on properties found to be located in “Declining Markets”.  The first question I am always asked is, “What determines a declining market?”  The answer can be found either on the appraisal or in the details of an automated loan approval from one of the automated underwriting systems (ie. Fannie Mae’s DU engine or Freddie Mac’s LP underwriting engine).  First, it is the job of the appraiser to assess the relative strength of the market where a property is located.  For many years, the small check box on page one of the appraisals was largely ignored since we were blessed with an expanding market.  Now, appraisers are marking the check box indicating a “Declining Market”.  Unfortunately, this current trend has caused all of the major national lenders, including the two biggest, FannieMae and FreddieMac to reassess their guidelines regarding lending in areas with declining markets.
 
In its December 5, 2007 Announcement 07-22, FannieMae amended its guidelines to state that “When a property is located in an area identified as declining, Fannie Mae will now require the lender to offer financing at LTV and CLTV ratios that are five percentage points below the maximum ratios allowed for the selected mortgage product.”  They went on further to put an additional responsibility on the originating lender to use additional resources to determine the strength of the market on appraisals where the appraiser indicated the market as stable.  They have directed us to ask for additional comps and other statistics on the local area to justify the “stable” evaluation.  Most appraisers are now providing comps “on the market” as well, to demonstrate “current market conditions”.  This serves as a more current indicator of the market than even sales that occurred a month ago.  Freddie Mac has announced similar changes to their guidelines.  FannieMae, FreddieMac and other automated systems have or will be making changes to their Automated Underwriting Systems (AUS) to address areas with declining markets.  If they have not already done so, they will be building zip code indicators into their systems that will cause a warning to print out on the loan approval sheet stating that the subject property is located in an area of declining values which would prompt the 5% reduction in the allowable lending ratio.  Therefore, when a prospective buyer has a “pre-approval” or an “approval” that was based done without a specific property address or zip code, the approval itself may very well be called into question.  My advice to you would be to make sure that you understand how this could possibly affect either your potential buyer or a seller who has accepted an offer.
 
Our particular investors are providing some potential relief in certain circumstances.  As soon as I take the time to explain those circumstances, they will most likely change again, but I have provided some information below that may help clarify what we know right now.  As I said, the main determining factor is the appraisal.  I have spoken to all of the appraisers I use and they tell me that most areas will have to be marked as “declining”, which means that more than likely the financing will have to be reduced by 5% from the maximum allowable limits.  However, we do have some outs so don’t be totally depressed.  There are areas that may not have to be marked as declining due to market trends in that particular area or neighborhood (see excerpt from an appraisal below).  Another alternative is to use an FHA or VA loan.  The government loans do not currently have these restrictions.  Below is some additional information you may find helpful that was extracted from information provided to us from our investors.
 
Summary of Declining Market options:
 
Please note the these policies are specific to appraisals marked as a declining market, AUS  messages addressing declining markets or investor-published lists of areas of declining markets.   For most of our investors, we no longer must automatically reduce the maximum allowable LTV/CLTV when the only indication of the possibility of a declining market is on the AUS report.   We must refer to each investor’s specific guidelines, but for several of our investors’ programs, we have the following options if our AUS report indicates the possibility of a declining market and the appraisal does not indicate a declining market:
 
1)      Reduce the maximum allowable LTV/CLTV limit per program guidelines.
 
2)      Or, If the LTV/CLTV is above 90%, the file may be submitted directly to the investor for underwriting at the maximum LTV/CLTV;
 
3)      Or, if the LTV/CLTV is 90% or below, the file may be submitted to our underwriter for a preliminary review at the maximum LTV/CLTV.  The underwriter will determine where the file needs to be underwritten based on the strength of the credit package and appraisal. 
 
If the appraisal indicates a declining market, more than likely the maximum financing will be 95% for conventional loans or the buyer would have to use FHA or VA unless they fit in a very small box of other possibilities that currently exist.  Below is an excerpt from a recent appraisal that was marked as stable based on information in the area where this home was located.