Welcome to the New RealTown! Submit Feedback
Member Login | Join RealTown

Phoenix Arizona Real Estate Blog, presented by ...

Glendale, Arizona

Phoenix Arizona Real Estate Blog presented by Jonathan Dalton, RE/MAX Desert Showcase

Subscribe

Your E-mail Address:
Subscribe to:

Recent Comments

RE: OUR NEW ADDRESS
Considering all that is going on in our real estat...
RE: OUR NEW ADDRESS
I'll check out the new web address. Thanks!...
RE: Premature Blogulation
Good article. Nice to read....
RE: What I've Learned from the Bubbleheads
On the other hand, someone that makes immature and...
RE: OUR NEW ADDRESS
will i be able to print out check stubs  to h...

Site Feed

RSS Feed

Phoenix Arizona Real Estate Blog, presented by ...

Phoenix area sales statistics

Nov. 14, 2006
As promised to the good folks at DCHousingBlues (and by extension HousingDoom), here are the latest statistics from the Arizona Regional Multiple Listing Service, which includes Maricopa County as well as out-of-county listings taken by in-county member agents.

I'm skipping commentary on the following statistics to allow readers to draw their own conclusions, whether they prefer year-over-year or month-over-month comparisons, and also because I'd hate to be accused of spinning the statistics. These are the numbers, do with them whatever you choose.

ARMLS Average Sales Price Per Month
  January February March April May June July August September October November December
2001 171,900 169,700 175,900 172,300 173,200 180,200 177,200 171,900 170,700 170,800 171,000 175,600
2002 184,100 170,200 177,200 180,000 183,200 188,200 187,300 181,700 176,600 182,600 185,200 184,500
2003 184,200 185,700 188,700 187,200 198,900 202,000 198,000 200,200 195,300 287,200 199,300 208,300
2004 206,100 204,000 212,500 208,800 215,000 231,900 220,400 222,000 224,700 231,100 232,600 237,000
2005 255,500 249,100 271,300 280,500 300,100 316,500 311,400 318,300 315,800 321,400 320,500 329,100
2006 336,900 224,000 330,600 329,100 345,200 348,100 332,300 331,300 324,500 330,200    

ARMLS Home Sales Median Price Per Month
  January February March April May June July August September October November December
2001 122,000 124,900 127,500 128,500 129,900 133,900 133,000 129,000 128,000 126,900 128,000 129,000
2002 138,000 134,000 129,900 135,000 139,500 141,000 140,000 140,000 139,000 142,000 141,000 145,000
2003 143,100 140,000 145,000 145,000 149,900 151,500 153,000 153,900 150,000 149,900 149,500 151,000
2004 150,500 150,000 155,000 155,000 160,500 169,000 168,000 168,000 170,000 174,900 176,000 181,900
2005 188,000 190,000 206,000 220,000 235,000 249,900 252,000 255,500 260,000 256,900 255,000 255,000
2006 254,900 252,000 255,000 255,000 259,900 264,800 257,000 254,900 249,900 250,000    

ARMLS Home Sales Per Month

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Total
2001
3,700 4,609 5,704 5,833 6,244 6,164 5,638 5,728 4,801 4,766 4,761 4,466 62,412
2002
4,016 4,403 5,732 6,131 6,783 6,404 6,114 5,797 5,542 5,723 5,365 5,940 67,950
2003
4,760 5,493 6,545 7,464 7,468 7,495 7,680 7,688 6,866 6,541 5,693 6,357 80,052
2004
5,118 6,196 8,744 8,971 9,019 10,019 9,040 8,992 8,677 8,173 8,071 7,902 98,922
2005
6,632 7,781 9,987 9,600 9,890 10,252 9,394 10,031 9,213 8,046 7,350 6,549 104,725
2006
5,266 5,918 7,497 6,798 7.573 7,214 6,102 6,163 5,608 5,599     63,738

ARMLS carries the disclaimer that "ARMLS does not guarantee nor is any way responsible for its accuracy; data maintained by ARMLS may not reflect all real estate activity in the market." I'll say ditto, as I'm relying on the available sales data.

(c) Jonathan Dalton, 2006 / Jonathan Dalton's Arizona Homes

Popping the Bubble

Nov. 10, 2006
Tagged with: real estate bubble
Remember six short years back to the year 2000 and the discussion of the Y2K bug? Civilization as we know it was destined to end when the clock struck midnight, all because nothing in this big, wide world was built to handle a two-digit year beginning with a zero. There was one radio host who had devoted his show for months to this idea. And then he and the rest of us woke up on January 1, 2000 and discovered nothing had happened after all.

Fast forward six-plus years and you're seeing a similar phenomenon with discussion of the so-called real estate bubble. The concept is not original - preying upon the hidden fears of the naive has been taking place for thousands of year - and neither is the terminology, which was stolen from the "tech bubble" the stock market experienced shortly after the Y2K worries disappeared.

The short version of the story - investors who had abandoned the stock market entered the real estate market, drove prices to insane heights and now are pulling back out of those markets and leaving the local real estate markets in smoldering ruins. So all a prospective buyer needs to do is wait long enough, the 30 - 50% increases in property value will vanish and everyone can go back to buying at 2004 prices.

And don't forget to hold on to that Confederate money, Scarlett, because the South will rise again ...

The bubble is a myth. It is a myth fueled by people either with only the slightest understanding of the underpinnings of the real estate market, those who for whatever reason wanted to buy before the run-up and didn't, and kept alive by a national media reporting facts and figures without the slightest desire (or ability) to provide perspective to the statistics.

Some have discussed the progenitors of the real estate bubble has civic-minded citizens looking out for their fellow man. While noble, this broad brush ignores the truth behind the so-called bubble ...

Bubble myths are fueled by individuals' private agendas.
Much like the woebegone criminals that appeared on the Electric Company in our youth (the guy smashing tomato sauce cans because his frog was canned as a child was my favorite), many who espouse the existence of a real-estate bubble harbor agendas that are relevant primarily to themselves but pass them off as a public good.

Maybe they bought in the midst of the hysteria. Maybe they wanted to buy but lost in a bidding war on a property. Or maybe they couldn't gather the courage to actually purchase, believing as always the market would come down even before it ran up, and now not even a drop in prices will allow them to enter the market. Or perhaps these folks are looking for the 15 minutes of Warholian fame to which everyone believes they are entitled. Blogging, like calling into talk radio, turns anyone with a keyboard (or phone) into an authority on the subject.

Bubble myths are fueled by are fueled by false hope. Many choose to believe the bubble hype rather than face the reality of markets where prices, even if they have declined, are not declining at a rate anywhere close to the increase. Yet some will read the blogs and listen to the news and fully believe that if only they wait a little longer, the home they want will fall 30% in value within months and land in their lap.

Of course, the major problem with such a notion and with the entire bubble concept is real estate is not the stock market. Stocks can and do drop to zero. Entire investments - every last cent - can be lost (and more, for those engaging in truly speculative plays.) Not so real estate. There is intrinsic value in land. Always has been. Always will be. To deny that fact is to base theory purely on mythology. Land may not always appreciate. Land may not always be located in areas where people want to purchase it (ask my sister in Houston, for example.) But land will always have an intrinsic value.

Bubble myths are fueled by a media machine with little idea what they report.
As I've said many times, having been a reporter for a living, the vast majority of reporters are knowledgeable in many areas and expert in none. The job doesn't require expertise and, frankly, when you are on a tight deadline it's not necessary to know every nuance of the topics you are covering. You need to know enough to write a story that presumable will inform the public. You need to know enough to make sure what you're reporting is truthful. And that will suffice.

But as Jeff Brown has pointed out in the past, truth doesn't necessarily make a story accurate.

So where do we go from here? Sadly, nowhere. Another aspect of much of the bubble set is their demand for total capitulation on the part of those in the real estate profession and those who do not share their views. There is no opportunity for debate because it is not debate they seek. And if you try to discuss the topic rationally, you quickly become the victim of ad hominem attacks.

Instead, the decision is left for the public at large, particularly those who are thinking of buying a home. What the bubble folks aren't telling you is many of them already own real estate. Yet they argue that those who don't, those who want to purchase their first home, should not.

A little odd, don't you think?

(c) Jonathan Dalton, 2006 / Jonathan Dalton's Arizona Homes

Technorati tags: real estate bubble
Word of the Day Ask the Experts Question of the Day