Jerry Bridges wrote on
July 6, 2009 6:15 AM
Hans wrote: Using "brackets" in photography has nothing to do with "HDR",
which stands
for "High Dynamic Range".
"Have to disagree with you Hans, you can't do a true HDR without brackets."
....
I do not know where to start. Maybe I shouldn't start at all, but...
Here's the statement by Jerry Bridges that I commented on:
"Jim, what Ronny is telling you to do is shoot in "brackets" or better known
as "HDR"."
At first I thought that was just another misinformed RT:er making a comment
on photography, so I just wanted to set the record straight about
photography, of which I know quite a bit since the mid-fifties.
Bracketing in photography is nothing new. As a matter fact it started when
we got cameras with adjustable lenses and shutters. (For the time being,
forget about the black hole cameras, if you wish).
'Bracketing' only means taking a series of frames of the same subject with
different shutter speeds (or, in extreme situations, at different apertures
- which actually makes NO sense since that would change the depth of field,
and thus defy the whole idea of taking multiple frames).
Now, back to my original comment. Your claim that to "shoot in brackets is
better known as HDR" is nothing but nonsense and false! It's NOT known as
HDR! Manual or automatic bracketing was known/used long before 'HDR', which
by the way is a "post processing" procedure, requiring off camera computer
software (for now), as opposed to 'bracketing', which is done in-camera.
Finally, I don't feel that people have to agree with ME, just accept and
embrace facts.
PS I noticed in your response that you claim to be an
"(also a paid semi-professional photographer)"
I hope you don't charge too much.
Hans O Oscarsson LL.M., MBA