Because there is no "live" client in the property, listing agents are getting lax and even downright unethical in their behavior. When the cats away the mouse does play. There is no accountability since no one is watching and the lazy agents can get away with not calling back buyer's agents and not following up when an offer is submitted to them. I think a lot of times the offers may fall into a black hole or sit on the listing agents desk until they get a better offer.
While you may have had bad experiences with some agents it is totally inappropriate to suggest that all agents in this situation are like this. And since you offered no qualifiers that is exactly what you did. Talking of Code of Ethics one might review disparaging fellow agents.
Stereotypes have no place here. As an REO listing agent I greatly resent sweeping comments that do not represent the majority of my fellow REO agents. As pointed out in other posts, this is a different and yes, more difficult task. And often (note the qualifier) the buying side agent is equally at blame for delays or problems. Believe me, offer instructions are ignored about 50% of the time in my experience. Oh, and those agents are the first to bitch.
Oh, most asset management companies do have standards of accountability. The Cat is not away. They have field reps that are checking on a regular basis. One might get away with sloppy procedures for a while, but sooner or later a lazy REO has no more listings.
Now, my point is not to pick on any one set of comments. But let's move away from broad brush painting and stereotypes. Fair enough?



Create New Discussion
Digest Archive
To Top
Quote







Rules of the Road
Posting Tips
Help














