Welcome to the New RealTown! Submit Feedback
Member Login | Join RealTown
The Real Estate Network
RealTown  Community  RealTalk  Legal-Contracts

RealTown's RealTalk

Back

Bookmark and Share  

Create New Discussion Digest Archive

 NAR-DOJ

Created by:
Merv Burgard, Real Estate Attorney

Date: November 20, 2008, Number of Replies: 10


View Profile

so what is the short version, and practical impact, of this item from Inman?
Merv.
**********
 

Settlement of an antitrust lawsuit that the federal government filed three
years ago against the nation's largest real estate trade organization is
now
final.
 

U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kennelly this week issued a final
judgment
to settle the U.S. v. National Association of Realtors case -- the lawsuit
was originally filed in September 2005 and amended in October 2005.
 

The federal government had charged that the Realtor group approved policies
governing the online sharing and display of property listings information
that were illegally restrictive, while the Realtor group countered that the
policies did not violate federal antitrust law.
 

A proposed settlement was reached in May 2008, just weeks before a trial
was
set to begin. The Justice Department had initiated an investigation of NAR
policies in 2003.
 

The proposed settlement was amended slightly (see Inman News) to address
public comments received, and Judge Kennelly signed off on these amendments
in issuing a final judgment.
 

In a statement today, NAR President Charles McMillan said, "This is a great
day for real estate and for consumers. This compromise is terrific news for
the industry. We are pleased with the settlement so that we can all focus
now on what matters most -- stabilizing the housing market and helping the
U.S. economy recover."
 

The final settlement provides that the Realtor group does not admit any
liability or wrongdoing, NAR also noted in its statement.
 

Gina Talamona, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said in a statement, "We
are pleased that the judge entered the settlement. The department believes
that the NAR settlement enhances competition in the real estate brokerage
industry giving consumers more choices, better quality service and lower
commissions."
 

Under the settlement agreement, NAR must adopt a "Modified Virtual Office
Web site (VOW) Policy" that allows member brokers who participate in
multiple listing services to operate Web sites that carry property
information from other brokers and does not allow other brokers to "opt
out"
from sharing property listings information with those VOW sites.
 

The settlement could potentially lead MLS participants to display a broader
range of property information on MLS participants' public-facing Web sites,
though consumers will be required to register at VOW sites before gaining
access to this more extensive set of information.
 

"The impact of the amended VOW policy is expected to be minimal, since most
consumers do not use VOWs because these sites require online registration,"
NAR officials said in a statement.
 

The settlement does not affect NAR's policies for Internet Data Exchange
(IDX) sites, which are powered by data-sharing agreements among brokers.
Brokers participating in IDX sharing agreements can choose to withhold
property information from other MLS participants.
 

NAR officials are required in the settlement to direct local Realtor boards
to repeal the former VOW policy and a separate hybrid policy dubbed the
Internet Listing Display (ILD) if they had adopted those policies, and to
direct those boards to adopt the Modified VOW policy within 90 days of the
final judgment, which was issued on Tuesday, Nov. 18.
 

NAR is directed in the final settlement to deny insurance coverage under
any
NAR insurance policy to boards that do not comply with the settlement and
to
report to the Justice Department "the identity of that member board and the
rule or practice it refused to rescind and cease to enforce."
 

NAR must designate an "Antitrust Compliance Officer" by mid-December who
has
responsibility for "educating member boards about the antitrust laws and
for
achieving full compliance with this final judgment."
 

And on a quarterly basis NAR must hand over to the Justice Department
copies
of any communications "with any person containing allegations of any
member's board's noncompliance with any provision of the Modified VOW
policy
or with this final judgment or failure to enforce any rules implementing
the
Modified VOW policy."
 

NAR is also required to publish a prominent link on its Realtor.org Web
site
to a Web site that has published copies of the final judgment, a notice to
repeal ILD and VOW policies, and a copy of the Modified VOW policy. And NAR
must publish all of these items in an upcoming issue of its Realtor
Magazine
publication.
 

Laurie Janik, during an NAR annual conference earlier this month, detailed
other provisions of the then-pending settlement before an audience of MLS
officials (see Inman News), such as requirements that participants in
NAR-affiliated MLSs actively engage in the business of real estate
brokerage
or risk losing participation as of May 27, 2009.

Editor's Note
The short version is that likely it was much to do about nothing. There is not going to be any rush to set up VOWs under the new rules. For a short summary, see http://www.realtown.com/about/resources/InternetListingDisplayResource/Final-SummarySaul and John
To Top Quote   Reply

Date: November 22, 2008

Gina Talamona, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said in a statement, "We
are pleased that the judge entered the settlement. The department believes
that the NAR settlement enhances competition in the real estate brokerage
industry giving consumers more choices, better quality service and lower
commissions
."

Why are commissions any of her business? To me this sums up the DOJ's POV regarding all things Realtor related. We make too much money and they're going to protect the consumer by "lowering commissions".

Is it just me, or does anyone else feel that they're over reaching with that statement, and.......... do you think they're done coming after Realtors?

To Top Quote   Reply
Glory bee Costa Licensed Real Estate Agent,  St. Michaels,  MD

Date: November 22, 2008

Why are commissions any of her business? To me this sums up the DOJ's POV regarding all things Realtor related. We make too much money and they're going to protect the consumer by "lowering commissions".

Is it just me, or does anyone else feel that they're over reaching with that statement, and.......... do you think they're done coming after Realtors? A. D.
<<

Reply: No they are not done coming after REALTORS, the majority has no idea, the amount of time we put in the amount of expenses we incur to make the money we make. This does not include the amount of other people we support, assistants, etc. Also, the lack a personal time. They will never accept what a REALTOR total goes through to close a transaction. Once in a blue mood we have a nice, smooth and quick settlement.

A Friend of mine is considering getting her license and ask if she could go to work with me for 7 days (this was in the busy time) Saturday come around and I said meet me at 8:30AM I will be showing new clients (I explained to the clients she was considering coming to work in the business and wanted to come along) no problem. had an hours break a2:30PM met other clients and had to deliver a counter to the listing agent at 6:30PM. At the end of the day, she said Glory Bee I am not giving up my person time to show property, let them schedule during the week a normal time to work. Need I say more, she is now a referral agent.

 

Glory Bee Costa ABR, CRS, GRI, E-PRO, SRES 410-310-9081-Cell 410-763-6001 EXT 107  Gen. Office 

Maryland-WaterFront-Homes.com     Glory@GloryBeeCosta.com     Re/Max Gold Realty, LLC- Easton, MD

To Top Quote   Reply
John Gusse Licensed Real Estate Agent,  Phelan,  CA

Date: November 24, 2008

Wait the best is yet to come. Look who is O's point man in the DOJ. Does Alian Gonzonles ring any bells. O's DOJ point man(hit man) was Janet "Da' Judge" Renos numero uno yes BOY. If you don't think Pandora's Box is wide open, think again. We are in for some wild times! Change? Oh Yeah!
John R Gusse,Realtor,Notary Public
Exit Desert Ocean Realty
Monavie, Independent Distributor


To Top Quote   Reply
Paul Silver,  Portsmouth,  RI

Date: November 25, 2008

Wait the best is yet to come. Look who is O's point man in the DOJ. Does
Alian Gonzonles ring any bells. O's DOJ point man(hit man) was Janet "Da'
Judge" Renos numero uno yes BOY. If you don't think Pandora's Box is wide
open, think again. We are in for some wild times! Change? Oh Yeah!
John R Gusse

---

Certainly the man, Eric Holder, who is the nominee for Attorney General, is
one of the more respected such nominees in at least 8 years... and is
considered among attorneys to be highly qualified. But I suppose you like
the Bush nominees more?

Change, yes... and thank goodness.

Have a great day!

Best regards,

Paul Silver, Esq.
Focus Professionals, Inc.

To Top Quote   Reply
Neal Adler, gri,abr, e-Pro Licensed Real Estate Agent,  Studio City,  CA

Date: November 25, 2008

RE: Eric Holder. If I recall he was behind the Mark Rich pardon that Bill Clinton gave a fugitive and owed the IRS millions.
To Top Quote   Reply
Jim Cummings Licensed Real Estate Broker,  Austin,  TX

Date: November 25, 2008

Paul Silver says:

Certainly the man, Eric Holder, who is the nominee for Attorney General, is one of the more respected such nominees in at least 8 years ... and is considered among attorneys to be highly qualified. ================================================================

Don't know if Marc Richt thinks he is highly qualified - but he certainly likes him!!!

JIM
The Jim Cummings Team
CRS, GRI, RECS, e-Pro 500
512-633-3853 Mobile & Voice Mail
Real Estate Consultants
mailto:Jim@AustinTxMls.com
AVALAR 360 - 7000 Bee Caves Rd. Austin, TX 78746
512-732-7001 Office 888-633-3853 Toll Free
To Top Quote   Reply
Robert King Licensed Real Estate Broker,  Saint Petersburg,  FL

Date: November 25, 2008

Paul Silver is really up on his Nominated Attorney stuff:  Here's what he has to say in all his infinite wisdom:

"Certainly the man, Eric Holder, who is the nominee for Attorney General, is
one of the more respected such nominees in at least 8 years... and is
considered among attorneys to be highly qualified. But I suppose you like
the Bush nominees more"?

To be honest with you Paul, I don't like Attorneys in general.  No pun intended!  Who do you think got us in this mess?  ATTORNEYS just like Bush’s and Obama's nominees.  Who better to bail us out than ATTORNEYS?  They are the most qualified, they orchestrated this mess in the first place.  Who do think wrote our by laws and ethics for NAR?  ATTORNEYS. Yea Paul do us all a favor and go back under that liberated rock you live under.  We are in for the same old crap democrats have showered us with for the past 24 months.  You want hope and change you got it!  From the Rubber stamp in the Oval Office to the Halls of Congress there are no more excuses now.  Who are the morons of the last 2 years going to blame for the next 4 years?  This is going to be an interesting time if we last another 2 years.  A billion here a billion there, will there really be any sustainable change?  It has never worked in the past what makes you think it will work in the future? I don't know which is worse Democratic Liberalism or Republican Bipartisanship?  They both stink if you ask me.  I guess the only thing left is Independence. Yea that's what we need, a mob of Independent knuckleheads running a broken system.  Now we have bunch of highly respected and highly educated kid running the country for the next several years. We don't even know what misery is yet!

To Top Quote   Reply
John Gusse Licensed Real Estate Agent,  Phelan,  CA

Date: November 25, 2008

I am not opposed to change, but when our very exsistance as a
FREE COUNTRY is jepordized, which I believe is a possiblity because of a past administrations actions and might I add at the point of a gun, I think we need to be very concerned who "O" is thinking of installing in his hierarchy. If you don't recall what I am refering to, then I ask you look in to the occurance I am speaking of and then tell me that this person is the best choice. You might agree if you take that step.
As far as Bush is concerned, I really don't see any difference between him or the incoming admin. They both have the same thig in mind; spend until its all gone. My mother used to say, "What do you think, money grows on trees"? Maybe we all should ask this question to everyone of these Corporate Mugs who have thier hand out.
Here is what I say to any BIG Government program that says "You are going to spread the wealth", STAY OUT OF MY POCKET, YOU ALREDY GOT TO MUCH!
Likewise I hope you have a wonderful day and a very Happy Thanksgiving!
John R Gusse,Realtor,Notary Public
Exit Desert Ocean Realty
Monavie, Independent Distributor


To Top Quote   Reply
Zeno Weir Licensed Real Estate Agent,  Pensacola,  FL

Date: November 26, 2008

www.Bushmaster.com still has
30 round AR mags for $20.95
Molon Labe!
We Hunt the Real Estate Buck for your Family
since 1987!
To Top Quote   Reply

Reply to Discussion:





  • Top Producer
  • Go e-PRO
  • Listing Domains
  • Point2
  • Allison James
  • T-ReX Global
  • Realtor Benefits
  • MyOnlineNeighborhood
  • NARexpo
  • Matthew Ferrara
  • Express Copy
  • Old Republic
  • Docusign
  • WebsTarget
  • RealtySoft
  • Inman Connect