Jack,
I'm not sure where you got the impression we disagreed here, but I don't think we do. What I was referring to was the "equating" of Consulting to Fee for Service in the title of this string, which I think is very misleading and might discourage curiosity about the Consulting model itself....and I know that's certainly not what we want (both for the agents AND for their clients) As I wrote in the post that challenged the "a.k.a." in the title:
""Consulting is, at its core, about CHOICES and about TRANSPARENCY. Could ONE of those choices include fees for particular services? Absolutely. Just a "commission paid at the close of escrow" can be one of those choices."
My intent was to simply make the distinction that Fee for Service is not the same thing as Consulting (which is what the title of this string implies when it says "a.k.a."). Charging fees (whether for a task, bundles of tasks, servicing of events, as a flat rate, etc.) can certainly be among the options that a Consultant offers...just as Commission after close of sale can be an option, or a "shared risk" approach which might well reduce the total charge with up front payments reducing the agent's "risk".
And that was my point as well in saying "Consulting is a mindset, not a method of payment". I think many agents have not ventured into adapting consulting into their business because they erroneously believe they will no longer be able offer "commission paid at closing". As a Consultant, there are many methods of compensation...commission is simply "one of them" rather than the only one.


Create New Discussion
Digest Archive
To Top
Quote


Rules of the Road
Posting Tips
Help














