Welcome to the New RealTown! Submit Feedback
Member Login | Join RealTown
The Real Estate Network
RealTown  Community  RealTalk  Legal-Contracts  Forced to use a lender

RealTown's RealTalk

Back

Bookmark and Share  

Create New Discussion Digest Archive

 Forced to use a lender

Created by:

Date: March 28, 2008, Number of Replies: 20


View Profile

I am in California and my client and I wrote up an offer on an REO property listed on the MLS. My client was required to get cross qualified with the bank. I understand completely and I explained to my client that it would help to get her offer accepted since we are the only offer. She received the approval after 8 days of nagging. However, the lender called and left a message on my voice mail that said if my client does not use her then our offer will be automatically rejected if we are asking for closing costs. I immediately called the lender and informed her that we raised the price of the home to cover the closing costs requested so as not to affect the banks bottom line and that the requirement she is stating was NOT listed in the MLS.

The agent says that he has no control and he has to follow the banks requirements. I then requested a copy of the letter she mentioned on my voice mail and she said it is for in-house purposes only citing that this document has been used for illegal activity. Any ideas where to look for the rules on this one? I know I have seen or heard of collusion somewhere, but I am having a hard time finding a citation. Right now it's the principle of the matter. Taking my clients to look for another house is the easy part, but seeing them mistreated is hard to swallow.

To Top Quote   Reply

Date: March 29, 2008

I am in California and my client and I wrote up an offer on an REO property listed on the MLS. My client was required to get cross qualified with the bank. I understand completely and I explained to my client that it would help to get her offer accepted since we are the only offer. She received the approval after 8 days of nagging. However, the lender called and left a message on my voice mail that said if my client does not use her then our offer will be automatically rejected if we are asking for closing costs. I immediately called the lender and informed her that we raised the price of the home to cover the closing costs requested so as not to affect the banks bottom line and that the requirement she is stating was NOT listed in the MLS
 
This does not sound right at all.  I have been listing REO's for 12 years now and never had that happen.  You need to push this issue with the listing agent and force them to go to the assest manager of the property.  The REO department and the origination department are usually 2 totally different divisions, most times not in the same location.  I am sure the REO manager will have issues with some over-aggressive loan officer trying to strong arm a buyer and losing a deal.   
To Top Quote   Reply
Robert King Licensed Real Estate Broker,  Saint Petersburg,  FL

Date: March 29, 2008

 
M loves to sell, has a problem with a belligerent bank examiner.  What's new?
 
"Any ideas where to look for the rules on this one? I know I have seen or heard of collusion somewhere, but I am having a hard time finding a citation. Right now it's the principle of the matter. Taking my clients to look for another house is the easy part, but seeing them mistreated is hard to swallow".
 
This is where you have to learn to swallow deep and long when you are working with banks that make DEMANDS that are not in the best interest with your client.  First of all to raise your price to cover the banks losses over the life of the loan is the first sign of weakness on the buyer's side of the equation in the lenders eyes.  Why do I say that? Because you said it yourself, you raised your offer to cover the costs.  Why would you want or even suggest the buyer pay more for the property than what is offered.  The buyer either wanted the property bad enough to pay the frieght or they think the market is going to turn around so they better get it before some other fool beats them to it.  So which is it?  You've been Schmoozed my friend.  No wonder the bank wants to carry the paper on your client.  I would take my client else where fast.  Let the bank find another sucker to be their fall guy.  First lesson to learn in all real estate negotiations with Bank Repoes, THERE ARE NO RULES!  It's a question of who blinks first.  In this case it appears that you've already blinked.  Move on to another property.  There are so many to choose from, I'm sure the bank will figure it out.
 
Robert King
Broker/Consultant
Charles Rutenberg, Realtors
Clearwater, Florida 
To Top Quote   Reply
Reginald Potts Licensed Real Estate Broker,  Richmond,  VA

Date: March 29, 2008

mloves2sellrealty@msn.com writes:

I am in California and my client and I wrote up an offer on an REO property listed on the MLS. My client was required to get cross qualified with the bank. I understand completely and I explained to my client that it would help to get her offer accepted since we are the only offer. She received the approval after 8 days of nagging. However, the lender called and left a message on my voice mail that said if my client does not use her then our offer will be automatically rejected if we are asking for closing costs. I immediately called the lender and informed her that we raised the price of the home to cover the closing costs requested so as not to affect the banks bottom line and that the requirement she is stating was NOT listed in the MLS.

The agent says that he has no control and he has to follow the banks requirements. I then requested a copy of the letter she mentioned on my voice mail and she said it is for in-house purposes only citing that this document has been used for illegal activity. Any ideas where to look for the rules on this one? I know I have seen or heard of collusion somewhere, but I am having a hard time finding a citation. Right now it's the principle of the matter. Taking my clients to look for another house is the easy part, but seeing them mistreated is hard to swallow.

Reg responds:

Assuming the listing agent is representing the bank, there should be disclosures and corresponding addenda disclosing the lender requirements. This could be a RESPA violation if the lender did not disclose this requirement to the listing agent at listing time or possible misrepresentation by the listing agent where this information should have been disclosed to the selling agent before the offer was made (via MLS listing or communicated from the listing agent), and failed to do so.  The listing agent should have made these documents readily available to you prior to submitting the offer. Discuss this with your broker and/or the listing agent’s broker to determine how to proceed as I am not familiar with the laws of California or of your respective MLS. RESPA requires full disclosure by the lender.

I hope you’re able to work it out.

Regards,

Reginald Potts, REALTOR®, ABR, GRI, CHMS, e-PRO

Century 21 Signature Realty, 2800 Buford Road, Suite 204, Richmond, VA  23235
(c) 804-536-1319, (o) 804-330-4222, (f) 866-233-2093
Reg@ReginaldPotts.comwww.ReginaldPotts.com

"Your Trusted Agent Serving All Your Real Estate Needs!"

 

To Top Quote   Reply
MarkJohnJay@GMail.com

Date: March 29, 2008

 

‘Move to sell’ writes in part:

I am in California and my client …wrote up an offer on an REO property listed on the MLS. My client was required to get cross qualified with the bank. …the lender called and left a message on my voice mail that said if my client does not use her then our offer will be automatically rejected if we are asking for closing costs.

Any ideas where to look for the rules on this one?

Right now it's the principle of the matter. ….Taking my clients to look for another house is the easy part, but seeing them mistreated is hard to swallow.

Mark Jay comments:

Look no further “Move to Sell” …I’ll provide the rules on this one.  I have a copy of “the rules” right in front of me….  Print out this message and tape these rules to your bathroom mirror so you can see them each day.   Memorize these rules!

THE RULE:

“The Bank will NEVER pay closing costs to one of their competitors.  N-E-V-E-R!  Almost all-- if not ALL of the closing costs are things that the Bank—being a lender—can provide in-house using people that would otherwise just be sitting around because-- in case you haven’t heard yet-- business is slow.  Maybe not slow in the REO area but certainly slow in the loan origination and closing department area.  Banks generate revenue and make money on closing costs!  Getting the loan AND the closing costs on the REO increases the bottom line to the bank.  Yes, I know you “built in” the closing costs.  That doesn’t matter.  Even if you wrote the offer at full list price PLUS the closing costs—it doesn’t matter.  Even if you wrote the offer at full list price plus 2 times the closing costs—it doesn’t matter.  Even if you wrote the offer at 110% of asking PLUS 3 times closing costs—it doesn’t matter.  The Bank will NEVER pay closing costs to one of their competitors.  N-E-V-E-R!    

You WILL use the bank’s closing person, appraiser, and anyone else the bank wants to use.   You’ll use the Bank’s choice of Title Insurance Agency.  You’ll even be agreeing to use the Bank’s choice of Title Insurance Agency for the Mortgagee’s policy.  Every penny of the deal will go to the Bank.  Are we clear on this rule?  ARE WE CLEAR!”    

Oh…I almost forgot—does the bank have a Homeowner’s Insurance Agency as a subsidiary?  If they do then get ready to have your buyer cross sold on using the Bank’s “Independent” Insurance Agency for the Home Owner’s Policy and maybe a discounted Home AND Auto policy.  Your clients DO have a car or two, right?

OK, then….  Now you know the RULES—one of them.  This always has been one of the rules and it always WILL be one of the rules… so get over it.

Now to another rule you mentioned-- “the principle of the matter”.  Here’s the rule on “it’s the principle”

Whenever anyone says ‘it’s not the money, it’s the principle’… it’s always the money.   Memorize THIS rule too….

THE RULE:

“When offered a choice between feeding your ego or feeding your family.  Put your family FIRST-- even if you’re an adult single guy or gal living in your parent’s basement and really don’t need much money.  In other words…Do you REALLY want to kill this deal and spend time and money to find a different property so this Bank-- stuck with an REO that it can sell and your client can buy at the price in the offer-- doesn’t make a profit on providing closing costs services?  Is that the principle?  The only principle that’s served by “doing it all over again” is how stupid you can be….  Do everything twice and get paid once?  How stupid is THAT?  Are we clear on THIS rule?  ARE WE?

Ok, then….

All the closing services will be at the usual high level the Bank provides its customers.  The closing person will be professional and nicely dressed.  The closing room—if it’s at the Bank—and it will be—will be a lot bigger than it has to be.  They’re will be coffee available.  You’ll get your parking ticket validated.  You’ll have a wonderful time!  Your seller will get the property, the Bank will make money, the Loan Officer you’re now resisting will make money, your broker will make money and YOU will make money.  WINNERS all around.  Win, win, win, win, win, win.  It will be a beautiful thing!

…and there’s never a reason to fight a beautiful thing… and certainly not because your client gets closing services and a Fannie/Freddie or other agency loan and mortgage from this lender rather than some other lender.

One more thing…  No matter where you get the mortgage money it will always be light green on one side and dark green on the other.  OK, there won’t be any cash money at the closing….  Conceptually though, the checks will all have the same numbers after the dollar sign no matter what lender’s name is printed on those checks.  Money is fungible.  Your favorite lender and loan officer won’t get the deal but YOU will.  Feed your favorite lender the NEXT deal—unless THAT deal is a Bank REO—trust me—he or she will understand.  Your favorite Loan Originator also has a copy of these rules…  J

…a closing note to the particularly dour and humorless….  I wrote this post using the following rhetorical styles: humor and sarcasm… and I had some fun doing it that way.

 

Mark Jay, e-Pro

REALTOR and Mortgage Consultant

414-771-7713  Voice

262-853-6001 Voice

Southeast Wisconsin MLS Region

Mark@MarkJayRealty.com

 

 

 

 

To Top Quote   Reply
Paula Bean Licensed Real Estate Agent,  Orlando,  FL

Date: March 30, 2008

This sounds like a RESPA violation to me...  talk to the manager or owner of the lender and see what they have to say.

With new home sales they will ask that you use a specific lender and if you do, they will pay your closing costs.  That is different as the developers like to call one lender and track all their deals. . .

BUT - insisting on it, with no options, and they are not willing to give you the paperwork to back up their claims?  NO. 

Maybe call the lender first and advise him or her that their lender is going to embroil them in a legal world they don't want to go to might also help.  Then again, if the rate is the same, and your buyer REALLY wants the house, then after you inform them, it is their decision as to how to move forward.

Good luck and Let us know how this turns out for you. 

Paula Bean, REALTOR
A Premier Class Realty, Orlando, FL
Native born REALTOR  helping people Move since 1979
National real estate trainer and speaker
WHY become an e-Pro?
a href="https://www.internetcrusade.com/epro/Host.asp?HID=10165">e-PRO&reg;</a>  Certified Technology Expert 

Click below to call me FREE

 
Click to Talk to Paula  Bean!
To Top Quote   Reply
Lonette Sellers Licensed Real Estate Broker,  Brentwood,  TN

Date: March 30, 2008

 I know I have seen or heard of collusion somewhere, but I am having a hard time finding a citation. Right now it's the principle of the matter. Taking my clients to look for another house is the easy part, but seeing them mistreated is hard to swallow.
 
Hello Whomever (you neglected to "sign" your posting);
 
You are correct; it is more than collusion in asking for your buyer to use the banks lender to purchase the REO property, IT IS ILLEGAL to require them to do so.  Your buyers have the right to obtain the best financing they can arrange for themselves IN THEIR OWN BEST INTERESTS and you, as their Buyer's Agent are entrusted to follow through with having enough inner strength to hold the line with this "bank" who owns the property and was basically deceitful in the beginning (saying they were going to "cross-qualify" and now demanding you use them, a common tactic).  You must speak to the Listing Agent and hold a FIRM LINE with him/her (much like an attorney would) and tell that listing agent there are literally thousands of REO properties in CA your qualified buyers can choose from and if their bank doesn't want them, perhaps it's best they send a cancellation form over ASAP and move on to another property.......is that what you are asking me (as the Buyer's Agent to do Mr/Ms. Listing Agent?)  and then wait for the Listing Agent's answer).  It's also O.K. to remind the Listing Agent of the illegal nature of the requirement of that which they are requesting and that you are considering reporting them to C.A.R., N.A.R., the local Board of Ethics, your own Grievance Committee, etc. (they make think you are a naive, new and or just plain weak Agent who is going to "fold").  It is utterly ludicrious in this market for any qualified buyer to have to lose a property they really want over a "lender war", which as I said, is not legal in the first place as a stipulation of purchase in any type of contract...even an REO.  Leners are just very wary right now,fearing that buyers are "pre-qualified" but won't actually end up approved in the final underwriting process due to so many recent changes; so they have chosen to become hyper-vigilent. 
 
THOUGHT:  Possibly you could offer to have your buyers put in writing that they would be willing to provide proof of actual underwriting approval (in writing) from their own lender of choice,( within a certain period of time )which would be acceptable to the REO bank, upon such time if your buyer did not achieve such approval, only then would the REO's bank have a "shot" at your buyer's loan, etc.  If the bank truly wants it's REO sold, (and not to "double dip with the sale of the property AND get the loan too, which is never the intent of any MLS listing), this should work - walk for a day or so and see what happens - be strong and don't let the bank's lender call your buyer's shots.  In the meantime, have your buyer get as far through the entire loan process as possible up to being actually "approved" and then when you present your next offer, you can tell your next Listing Agent your buyers have already been through underwriting and are actually  "Approved" subject only to title search, clear termite and appraisal - done deal.   Also, talk through your whole "strategy" with your buyers, educate them and make sure they are "on board" with you so they feel you are all in this together and they are aware of what you are doing for them and WHY and with their permission....after all, it's they who are being "jerked around" right now, you are just the Agent who has to do the hard work for them - make sure they know what's going on all the time.  Good Luck!
 
P.S.  I worked through years of these bank REO's in CA after the 1994 Northridge earthquake in CA devestated our real estate market for many years.  Short sales, relocations, and REO'S were a majority of the business for many, many years prior to the big "boom" and run-up which followed.  This current cycle too will play itself out, but until then, don't let the less than ethical players get the best of you, because they will try - be strong and fight the "good fight" for your clients.
 
 
Lonette Sellers
Broker, ABR, CRS, GRI, e-Pro
Re/Max Elite, Brentwood TN
Cell (615) 495-7770  Fax (615) 376-7850
lhobbs01@comcast.net
Serving Home Buyers & Sellers Since 1987
"The Truest Measure of Character is Who You Are When No One Is Looking"
 
 
 
To Top Quote   Reply
Lonette Sellers Licensed Real Estate Broker,  Brentwood,  TN

Date: March 30, 2008

All the closing services will be at the usual high level the Bank provides its customers.  The closing person will be professional and nicely dressed.  The closing room—if it’s at the Bank—and it will be—will be a lot bigger than it has to be.  They’re will be coffee available.  You’ll get your parking ticket validated.  You’ll have a wonderful time!  Your seller will get the property, the Bank will make money, the Loan Officer you’re now resisting will make money, your broker will make money and YOU will make money.  WINNERS all around.  Win, win, win, win, win, win.  It will be a beautiful thing!

Sorry Mark, but I have to strongly disagree with you here, although I certainly understand where you are coming from.  "Peace at any cost" seems to me to be the mantra you've adopted with your buyer's best interests being the lamb who went to slaughter.  While "making the deal" is better than "no deal" and certainly has more "upside" for us as Brokers on the first contract (as opposed to finding another property) to "cave" in to the bank's demands to force a buyer to use an REO's typically over-inflated charges of all of their corporate owned affilates as well as locking your buyer into god-knows what type of mortgage/fees, etc., just for the priveledge of purchaing one of the bizillion REO properties available right now, as a 21 yr veteran Broker, CRS, ABR, blah, blah, blah, somewhere I remember an oath to "put the client's interests before myself", which would mean:  1.  find out how badly that buyer wants that particular property and educate them on what's going on with all of that "insider shi_" and see if they even want to deal with (and pay the extra money associated with it....is it worth it....."a beautiful thing....to them?)  2. If after they've heard the real scoop of what the bank is really up to and really wants of them and what's it's truly going to cost them, let them decide whether they'd like you, as their Buyer's Agent (remember, that's supposedly your job) to move forward, per their instructions, or to ditch the REO and find them another property, dispite the extra hard work.  It's how we handle ourselves in these difficult markets (including doing extra work) which sets true professionals apart from the competition and determines longevity in a profession many cannot tolerate more than a few years.  I HAVE CLOSED PLENTY OF REO'S USING MY BUYER'S OWN CHOICE OF LENDER, ESCROW, TITLE, APPRAISOR, ETC.  They would not pay HOA transfer fees nor for buyer's Home Warranty. 

Just wanted fellow Realtors to know the banks do not have to be in charge as you've stated it as a RULE - I've got closings and satisfied buyers which prove otherwise.  Of course the banks are happy they have you so convinced....you're out there generating more business for them telling us it's a lost cause to fight them when they (the banks) are the ones with the properties to unload and we (Realtors) bring the buyers they need to help get rid of said inventory and then they want to mess with us and our buyers....go figure!!

Lonette Sellers
Broker, ABR, CRS, GRI, e-Pro
Re/Max Elite, Brentwood TN
Cell (615) 495-7770  Fax (615) 376-7850
lhobbs01@comcast.net
Serving Home Buyers & Sellers Since 1987


 

To Top Quote   Reply
Scott Nelson Licensed Real Estate Agent,  Medford,  MA

Date: March 30, 2008

You might consult your local attorney general office, or office of consumer affairs
To Top Quote   Reply
rich@rich-hudson.com

Date: March 30, 2008

 
This sounds like a RESPA violation to me... talk to the manager or owner of
the lender and see what they have to say.
With new home sales they will ask that you use a specific lender and if you
do, they will pay your closing costs. That is different as the developers
like to call one lender and track all their deals. . .
BUT - insisting on it, with no options, and they are not willing to give you
the paperwork to back up their claims? NO.
Maybe call the lender first and advise him or her that their lender is going
to embroil them in a legal world they don't want to go to might also help.
Then again, if the rate is the same, and your buyer REALLY wants the house,
then after you inform them, it is their decision as to how to move forward.
Good luck and Let us know how this turns out for you.
Paula Bean, REALTOR
A Premier Class Realty, Orlando, FL
Native born REALTOR helping people Move since 1979
National real estate trainer and speaker
WHY become an e-Pro?
a
href="https://www.internetcrusade.com/epro/Host.asp?HID=10165">e-PRO®</a
> Certified Technology Expert

Click below to call me FREE

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Nice use of the click to talk feature of realPING.com, Paula

For those interested, go to http://realPING.InternetCrusade.com

Rich

To Top Quote   Reply

Reply to Discussion:





  • Market Leader
  • Point2
  • Listing Domains
  • Go e-PRO
  • Top Producer
  • Agent's First Choice
  • Allison James
  • Inman Connect
  • MyOnlineNeighborhood
  • iHouse Websites
  • Matthew Ferrara
  • Realtor Benefits
  • RealtySoft
  • realEseller
  • REALTOR Benefits Program
  • T-ReX Global