Melina Tomson has stated that she would throw $80 to the wind and file a complaint, "failing to disclose a Material Fact regarding Refinancing so therefore her buyer was misrepresented on account of the NONDISCLOSURE".
"Failing to disclose the refinance and the ability of the property to be closed, could be construed as misrepresentation. I'd be all over that..."
What I don't understand is why would anybody regardless of their situation have to disclose anything to anybody for any reason other than a Material Fact? If it were a MF it would be KNOWN or at least found out about prior to turning the Client over to the BAD PEOPLE! As I see this situation as it's been partially disclosed here, I think the Client (buyer) should go after the person who represented them in the first place. The EBA if there was an EBA. Now if the Agent were a NON_REPRESENTATIVE then no harm done as far as the Agent is concerned. However, if the Agent were anything other than a NON_REP, culpable negligence may come into play here. I'm not an Attorney but, does anybody know what a Material Fact is? Does anybody know how to investigate whether a builder or lender may be hiding a Material Fact or not? What if there were no Material Facts to be found? I guess you got a problem, what about suspecious activity? You see you can't hide something that is in plain view, but you may have to do some digging around to find out if their is a dead rat (Material Fact) lying around somewhere unbeknownst to everybody's interest. This is why Short Sales can be real sticky if you don't know what you are doing.
Look, if anybody wants to find out anything about anybody all you have to do is go ONLINE and do a search. Here in Florida if I want to know about anybody related to Real Estate, Building Trades, Insurance, Financing, etc.... all I have to do is go to BBB or DPR or various other sites to find out if a Suspect is working above board or not! What ever happened to Due Diligence. Don't think I'm sticking up for the builder and their brain dead F&I manager, I'm not. Checking into a lender's practice is so easy and it ends all the speculation and establishes your own Due Diligence paper trail. When I check out a builder I go to the work site and observe the workforce. If I see suspicious activity that appears to be of questionable origin or other unusual characteristics on a builder or developer's site, I take notes. Not to prejudge but to make an informed eye contact opinion of what I'm observing in real time. To further my Due Diligence, I fire up the Computer and head over to the BBB and DPR, but it doesn't end there, there are many sites you can surf to and find out all kinds of things on businesses and people. It's kind of like the Duck Theory, if water runs off the back, it has web feet, quacks... it's
A) clever disguise, B) some weird bird C) a duck D) all of the above. Now this is not a trick question, but I'm sure there are enough people in the world who have lived long enough to realize you could regret your answer if you throw common since to the wind like $80 bucks.
If I were an Attorney I would want to know who has the deepest pockets, then I'd want to know who all the players are, finally I would find a way to nail the party that is most culpable and go after that party with a fine tooth comb, considering what the payoff for me would be. You see, Attorney's don't take these cases pro-bono. They want to get paid and if they think they can win and get paid from the person with the deepest pockets, LETS SUE!!!! However, this may be a case for small claims court, Yea I can see it now, the little ole Realtor and their former buyer going after the Big Bad Builder, Lender and Candlestick Maker. Yep I'm sure this case is going to fly right through like a small Gail on the high seas.
Robert King