The Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) for banks and appraisers is supposed to protect appraisers from coercion by banks to “hit the numbers.”
Adopted May 1, 2009, for banks making Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loans, the new code prevents lenders from ordering appraisals directly from the appraiser. Instead, banks are offloading this task onto appraisal management companies (AMCs) to avoid the appearance of influencing appraisal outcomes.
The problem is twofold - the fox is watching the henhouse, and AMCs are taking shortcuts to boost their profits, which they may be sharing with their lender partners.
Some banks own or have an interest in appraisal management companies, which keeps the money in the family, including Countrywide and its subsidiary AMC LandSaft, Wells Fargo and Rels Valuation, among others. These partners are already engaged in lawsuits over their alleged practices of inflating appraisals and/or intimidating appraisers.
With banks able to own up to 20% of an AMC without violating the HVCC, there’s little oversight with teeth, which is enabling banks to “hit the numbers” in the opposite direction – to avoid making housing loans.
While proof is missing that this practice is happening, there’s plenty of talk in the trenches that whether intentionally or unintentionally, housing transactions are hitting walls – due to appraisals coming in under market value.
The first person to bring this to my attention was Fritzi Barbour, president of the Greenville Association of REALTORS®. She told me that it was appearing that if a bank is accepting TARP funds, “you will have worse problems getting your loan approved.”
One broker who wishes to remain anonymous told me one of her office’s listings failed to appraise. The loan was through Bank of America, which used an automated valuation model (AVM) out of Florida –three states away- instead of hiring a local appraiser.
AVMs, an online valuation product, can be ordered for as little as $35 compared to hiring a professional appraiser at $350-$500.
Explains David Reed, a mortgage broker and author in Austin, Texas, “AMCs sign up appraisers from all over the country to be a part of their service. When an appraisal order comes in, whomever is next in line for an appraisal gets the order. AMCs also require the appraisers to take a reduced fee for their appraisals if they want to be on ‘the list.’"
The HVCC in effect allows AMCs to perform much like HMOs. They operate as a middleman – taking a cut of money from the service provider (doctors, appraisers) while reducing service to the customer (patients, home buyers.)
Reed says that he almost lost a deal when an AMC hired an appraiser to do a drive-by – also a low cost “exterior only” alternative to a full appraisal. The appraisal came in $4,000 low because the appraiser wrote in his report that the interior was “below average,” and despite being hired to perform an exterior-only appraisal, missed including the positives – a sprinkler system, fence, and greenbelt view which would have more than made up the $4,000 shortfall.
Reed says that he almost lost a deal when an AMC hired an appraiser to do a drive-by – also a low cost “exterior only” alternative to a full appraisal. The appraisal came in $4,000 low because the appraiser wrote in his report that the interior was “below average,” and despite being hired to perform an exterior-only appraisal, missed including the positives – a sprinkler system, fence, and greenbelt view which would have more than made up the $4,000 shortfall.
“Did you catch that?” says Reed. “An ‘exterior only’ appraisal means you don't go in the house. So how could the appraiser determine that the interior was below average? The fact is that he couldn't have.”
Thanks to the restrictions by the HVCC, the loan officer of the bank Reed was working with couldn't call the appraiser and point out these errors.
Thanks to the restrictions by the HVCC, the loan officer of the bank Reed was working with couldn't call the appraiser and point out these errors.
“He could only call the AMC and complain,” says Reed. “Nothing happened for a couple of days so the Realtor called him but the appraiser never called him back, either.”
The loan officer then ordered a full appraisal from the same AMC, the AMC ordered the appraisal and of course, the value came in at $225,000.
The loan officer then ordered a full appraisal from the same AMC, the AMC ordered the appraisal and of course, the value came in at $225,000.
Yet another horror story reveals the problems with the new Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac “declining market” guidelines. Appraisers now must provide sets of numbers all the way back to a year ago. This means that even if a market is climbing, like 33 metros recently identified by the NAR, appraisals can still come in 5% lower than similar homes purchased as little ago as April 2009. The reason? If the market was declining in January, that goes into the formula.
How’s that for a kick in the pants?
If you have deals that are being lost due to similar problems, there are a few things you can do:
Have a portfolio lender on tap to take over if a TARP lender is finding too many reasons not to make a righteous loan.
Make sure the lender involved in your transaction is ordering a full appraisal. Your client should be provided with a copy of the appraisal.
Make sure you have proof whether or not your market is declining. Lenders have some discretion to acknowledge rising markets.
Alert your buyers and sellers to be prepared for possible snags. Make sure your buyers have longer locks on their loans, and alert sellers that closings may not take place on time.



















Comments
Comment by: Ruth in Honolulu
- Jun 25, 2009 2:41:28 PMThe HVCC is a mess!
I think the original "intent" may have been solid, but according to some of our local appraisers (in Hawaii), they are being solicited to sign up for various companies who promise to put them in the appraisal database. Of course with each sign up comes a "fee". Our appraisal prices have increased by about 20-30% because, of course, the AMCs (aka the "middle man") needs to be paid. What a joke!
Here's another problem: One of my lenders told me that he ordered two appraisals at the same time on two different properties in two different parts of the island. Surprise! He got the same appraiser for BOTH properties. So much for that fairness the HVCC was supposed to create.
HVCC Scorecard:
"Middle Men (AMCs)": 1
Banks Affiliated with AMCs: 1
Consumers: 0
Comment by: Jim Gilbert
- Jun 25, 2009 8:26:07 PMA client of mine just lost a home because of an appraisal that came in $27,000 below market (on a $202K home). We had Bank of America ask for a reconsideration of the appraisal, for which I provided comps that supported the value. The appraiser, who did not know the market in which the home was located, refused to change the value! How sad that no communication between the parties is allowed. The Sellers and the Buyer were both losers on this deal. Add to this the fact that my Buyer loved the home! We are looking for another home in the same area, but are a bit scared now that another home will not measure up under the new guidelines either.
Jim in Austin
Comment by: Gregory Hartley, SRA
- Jun 25, 2009 10:18:52 PMWhile it's true the HVCC has many drawbacks, there is the reality that many appraisers are telling the truth. An ethical appraiser reflects the market and the market is down everywhere, period. Realtors and loan originators have a handy finger that they use to point at the appraiser every time there is a problem with value, a concept they do not generally understand anyway because they are not trained or educated in value. Prices are rising but the properties don't appraise. What's the problem? The appraiser. Prices are falling and the properties don't appraise. What's the problem? The appraiser. Here's the real problem: for years loan originators and Realtors have been yanking appraisers around because they have the leverage and the power. The property didn't appraise? I'll find an appraiser who will bring it in, says the lender. The property didn't appraise? You don't know the market, says the Realtor. The truth is, the lenders uses the promise of continued business to pressure the appraisers and the Realtors used the promise of no more referrals to the lender if the lender can't get the appraiser to play ball. That is why the HVCC is a reality.
There have been plenty of appraisers who were willing to play ball that made all appraisers look like idiots, but they are the minority. I have urged every appraiser I know, both personally and on online forums, to say no to AMCs and their low fees. Let the AMCs continue to use these "out of town" appraisers long enough and the bad loans will start to pile up and the AMCs will magically disappear and take their bad appraisers with them. The majority of appraisers who are taking these low fees are trainees or appraisers with low level licenses who are used to getting a partial cut of the fee from their mentor anyway, so it is not a pay cut to them. The problem is, they have left their mentor too early and they do not fully understand appraisal theory and practice. It will come back to haunt them.
In the meantime, all you lenders and Realtors take a long look in the mirror and confess what part you had to play in the HVCC mess. Face up to the fact that the the appreciation rate of 2006 & 2007 was irrational exuberance and was manufactured by you. Greed was the driving force behind those record breaking years. Greed on the part of Realtors, lenders, sellers, and investors. If you follow the money, you'll see the people making the most out of a mortgage transaction are the Realtors and the lenders because they are paid on a commission basis, not a fee basis like an appraiser. Want to make costs to the consumer go down? Put Realtors and originators on a fee basis. There is no rational reason why there should be a 5, 6, or 7% commission paid on a real estate transaction. But in the long run, what difference does it really make if costs to the consumer goes up $200 or $300 in a mortgage transaction? Everything goes up: gasoline, insurance, groceries, electricity. Why should mortgage transaction costs be any different? Those costs are usually mortgaged anyway so it only costs the consumer a few cents a month, anyway. The main thing to remember is that, most of the time, the appraiser is the most highly trained and educated party to a mortgage transaction, the most highly licensed, has the most continuing education, does the most work, and has the most accountability. Oh, and gets paid the least, almost forgot that part.
The current mortgage crisis should be a wake up call to congress to realize that licensing appraisers didn't go far enough. The savings & loan crisis should have resulted in licensing of lenders as well. All lenders and all originators, no exceptions. Now that the NAR has their hackles up and is spending some of their gigantic treasure chest lobbying against the HVCC, something will probably happen. But if it does, don't expect the good old days to return. Appraisers have learned very quickly what it feels like to have a little independence, the way it was always intended to be. It won't be so easy to push us around anymore. And don't expect any thanks if you do happen to get the HVCC repealed. It will just reveal, once again, that money talks. And all you finger pointers remember, when you've got a finger pointing at someone, you also have three pointing back at yourself.
Gregory Hartley,SRA
Blue Moon Appraisals
Birmingham, AL
Comment by: Scott A. Austin, IFA
- Jun 26, 2009 8:31:59 AMMy horror story has occurred many times. You see it was always easy for me, as an appraiser to go out and get a new mortgage broker client.
Typically I would do a few appraisals for the client, and when I turned in an appraisal that came in below the "target" or below the contract price I would be insulted, and vilified. It is as if the purpose of the appraisal was to rubber-stamp the loan process rather than determine the collateral value of the property. In years of appraising for mortgage brokers, I never had one say "Thanks for being honest. We might have made a bad loan if it had not been for your impartial analysis."
What I got was the same thing over and over. Fired. You see, mortgage brokers have no use for honest appraisals, or those who produce them. They only want the deal to close, whatever it takes.
They think you are out of your mind if you actually have the nerve to mention the rotten soffit, the half inch crack in the foundation, the leaking roof, the hole in the siding or the mold on the wall.
One other common denominator. Mortgage brokers never voluntarily pay the invoice on an appraisal which does not result in a loan closing. Never. They only pay that invoice after repeated calls and in some cases, threats of turning them in to the state regulators. Many times the appraiser just never gets paid, because for the most part, mortgage brokers are unaccountable. Is it any wonder so many appraisers have turned to the dark side? It's either "Play ball by our terms, or we'll find an appraiser who will".
Why is it not a horror story for the real estate agent and mortgage broker when a client buys a house for $20,000 above market value with the help of a rubber-stamping appraiser? Why is it not a horror story when a bank loses their shirt on a short sale, or foreclosure because the house they are selling was never worth the amount of money agreed upon in the sales contract? Why is it that the only horror story agents and mortgage brokers can come up with involves their not getting a commission?
I have been blessed to find work with non-mortgage related clients. Clients who actually grade the appraiser based on excellence, rather than hitting a number. In case you are wondering, I have an exceptional variance (degree of accurately predicting future sale prices). I apply the same principles to the appraisal process regardless of the type of assignment. So I am quite sure that in all those cases where I have been ridiculed for not hitting the numbers it was not my analysis at fault, but rather the bias of the interested parties at work.
Until mortgage brokers and real estate agents come to accept the fact that a certain percentage of deals will not close because the true market value is not what the interested parties want it to be, then the appraisers will continue to be ridiculed and or pressured. The definition of market value is not determined by two parties in a sales contract, by a real estate listing or a tax assessor. A house is not necessarily "worth what someone is willing to pay for it." Otherwise no one could either sell too low or buy too high. The definition of market value is hinged upon the reality that the market is not one or two players, but a much broader consensus of eligible participants.
Recently, as a result of the HVCC, there have been more and more real estate deals and loans falling through as a result of the appraisal. But through the years, I've heard countless real estate agents and mortgage brokers say things like "I've never had a deal that didn't close because of an appraisal". Now that is a horror story.
Comment by: Jeff Hart
- Jun 26, 2009 3:59:06 PMHVCC - I was always taught, that those who have the money make the rules. Place the blame for the current housing mess, where it belongs. It was not the appraisers, mortgage brokers or realtors, try looking to the banks and wall street.
The banks had the money and made the rules, created loan programs which made absolutely no sense, and those on Wall Street couldn't figure out that stated W2 loans where a bad investment, just because Moody's stamped it AAA.
The loan programs allowed many on paper to offer higher and higher prices for homes, therefore driving up the values. Was it riduculous, absolutely. Where the appraisers at fault, absolutely not - the comparable sales where available within a block - forget the 1 mile rule.
Did mortgage brokers create the programs? Once again the banks called the shots, supposedly underwrote the loans, and provided the money to close. Did some mortgage brokers abuse the programs being offered - absolutely, although on more than one occasion, the lender's underwriter actually called and 'suggested' how the loan would qualify.
Jump forward to the present: those loan programs no longer exist, percentage wise those left in the industry are few - and if you can not originate/process Conv or FHA files - you are sending out hundreds of resume's a week. Lenders were doing a fine job reviewing the appraisers work, asking for addtional comps, and current listings - running a AVM against the given value - AMC's are a waste of money for the consumer, resulting in addtional weeks - therefore longer lock terms and higher rates - pretty much a hose job for the consumers.
Those of us who remain, wish to do, and have done, and treat our respected jobs with professionalism, honesty and dignity. Please put more than 5 minutes in considering the ramifications of HVCC, since apparently someone (A.C.) did not take that long to conceive such a lousy system.
HVCC - dump it, it's a dud
Comment by: Rick Wilkins, Real Estate Broker & Appraiser since 1975
- Jun 30, 2009 5:32:49 PMThose who have stated that most appraisers working with mortgage brokers/bankers, & most banks, has been nothing more than a "Yes" guy/gal that hits numbers & implicitly promises not to say anything negative about the property is right on. JUST MAKE IT CLEAN AND HIT THE NUMBER. The big majority of appraisers that built clientele, grew offices & made good money appraising did exactly that. If an appraiser showed any wavering from the "rules" he/she was soon discontinued.
Consequently, it appeared to me there could be merit to the HVCC arrangement. Now that it has been in existence a couple of months, it is obvious that there are major holes in the program as evidenced in the implementation by Appraisal Management Companies allowing abuse of consumers, appraisers, & various real estate professionals.
But then, when has a Government mandated program ever really worked as intended, that is, without holes in well intended legislation that left it vulnerable to misuse & abuse. Most pertinently, remember the late 1990's when congress passed legislation that pushed lenders to make risky loans so that more Americans could enjoy home ownership. A great ideal that became the foundation for the current disaster in the housing market. Who was watching the ship? Can we afford more of that?
The HVCC was intended to fix a problem that has existed since at least 1975; a problem that was completely ignored by the appraiser licensing that began in the early 1990's; which, in my view from the central coast of California, added another layer of bureaucracy while solving no problems.
Now that it has become obvious that implementation of the HVCC has created many problems, a collection of individual professionals and/or some group with the necessary experience & wisdom, working with law makers & the bureaucracy, should determine how to correct the problems & put AMCs in their proper role as a mid-stream buffer before the chaos spreads more pain to our citizens & financial system.
Post a Comment