Perform a Google search for the keyword phrase "Real Estate Articles" and you'll be given over 10 million web pages to peruse. Making up the top ten results will be web pages from domains that you would expect. These include CNN, The Wallstreet Journal, and Realty Times. Each one of these sites has thousands of pages with frequently updated content so its no suprise that they rank well. What is surprising is seeing www.south-county.org/Gilroy/RealEstate/RealEstateGuides.html at the top of the list.
It's a simple web page with links to about two dozen articles on standard real estate topics like home warranties, foreclosures, and financing. The articles are informative and well written but they do make you wonder why Google thinks so highly of them. Here are couple of points.
The articles are displayed in very small font making them difficult to read.
I couldn't tell you exactly how Google treats font size (and neither could anyone who doesn't have access to the Google algorithm) but common sense would lead me to believe that it does have an impact on seo, especially if its very small text that could be considerered an attempt to fool the search engine. I don't think south-county.org is trying anything malicious but with every article written in a font size of 1, the text is difficult to read. You wouldn't recommend a book with extremely small text and you would think Google would have similar sensibilities when it comes to recommending web pages.
The articles are displayed on very simple web pages.
Black text on a white background. Its about as simple as you can get. No navigation bars, no images, just text. This may be part of why the web site ranks well. Google's algorithm probably doesn't care very much if you website wins any design awards. It's spider is hungry for text and not much else.
Meta keywords that don't exist in the text of the document.
Meta keywords are displayed in the head section of an html documents and are used to instruct search engines what keywords exists on the page. They aren't as important for good seo as they once were however if they are used it's critical that the keywords exists in the text of the web page. Or so I thought. If you look at the source code for south-county.org you'll find several meta keywords that do not appear in the body text of the web page. Similar to using using very small fonts this practice could be interepreted as an attempt to trick the search engines. Surprisingly, south-county.org doesn't appear to be penalized for doing this.
Inbound links
When another website links to yours Google considers this to be casting a vote for your site. Having a high number of inbound links (especially from quality sites) is a great way to achieve top search engine rankings. Google provides a search method for determining the number of inbound links a site has. The format is link:www.website.com
Use Google as the website, link:www.google.com and it will show around 400k inbound links. (The number isn't exact but it can give you an indication of how many inbound links a site has.) Enter link:www.south-county.org and the number of inbound links is around 100. Not bad but not overly impressive either.
So why does the web site perform so well for a popular phrase like "Real Estate Articles". Honestly I have no idea, and Google probably wants to keep it that way.



















Comments
Comment by: Barry Hurd
- Oct 16, 2008 7:09:21 PMThat really is not an exception. The site is laid out with minimal exclusion, but the keyword "real estate articles" is not a trafficed term- the site only has about 3-4k visitors a month.
The font type 1 doesn't hurt SEO, it is completely legible and the time on page is over a minute, which means the bounce-rate appears to be fairly on the "up and up" . If you can maintain a good bounce-rate, you can pretty much maintain any ranking.
I wouldn't use the Google link check typically, it doesn't relate enough historical links which seem to be used in ranking (which is funny, even on Google) Yahoo has 538 links going at the site, and they are actually a fairly heavy percentage on the term "real estate articles" and "articles on real estate"
Comment by: Nona Green
- Oct 18, 2008 10:26:15 AMDoes anyone of you techies know if random inbound links from unpopular web sites actually hurts SEO? I've heard conflicting answers on this. Sorry if this is old news.
Comment by: New Homes Georgia
- Oct 18, 2008 10:26:19 AMUse Google's webmaster tools to verify your site; then, you can take a look at inbound links. However, I'm sure Google doesn't give every link equal weight.
Comment by: MikeParker
- Oct 22, 2008 4:07:46 PMWell, I am somewhat of a pain in the butt, but to my thinking, why do we care about what's on page one of Google for "Real Estate Articles?" For certain, no Internet buyer is looking for homes under those words.
And that pretty much sums up my view of "Page one position" in anything not DIRECTLY related to what we sell on the most local of levels: Internet shoppers look for homes with one of the following phrases, over 85% of the time:
1. City, State, Real Estate
2. City, State, Homes for Sale
3. City, State, MLS Listings
4. City, State, Realtor
That's where we all need to be found. But, then what? We have hundreds of clients over the years who have been on page one but who would not implement soft lead capture becaue "it ruins the look of my site" or some other reason. They did not succeed in internet real estate. I'm here to tell you, folks, that without lead capture, you might as well expect very little in the way of leads or sales of quality from your site.
Being number one on Google for a phrase that people do not shop for homes on is much like being a relief pitcher for the Chicago Cubs today: season is over, relief pitching is irrelevant to the Chicago Cubs.
Likewise, being found on the wrong phrase is equally irrelevant. It's a process to be found, to convert and to sell. If you aren't carefully doing all three, you will most likely continue to be one of the 93% of realtors who don't like their performance from the Internet, according to NAR.
Sorry to be so harsh, but I see so many people thinking that WHAT they are found under doesn't matter, and it absolutely does.
Post a Comment