Although felony sex crime rates have declined in California in recent years, the growing presence of sex offenders in the community remains a major concern of the public. This concern has prompted the state to take a number of steps to further the arrest and punishment of such offenders, tighten sex offender registration requirements, and notify the public when such offenders are paroled in their neighborhoods. At the same time, there has been a recent trend in California landlord-tenant law to increase owner responsibility to protect tenants from criminal conduct of third parties. The stakes grew even larger for rental property owners and managers in the wake of a statutory disclosure law effective in July of 1999.
Who is Required to Register?
In California, about 78,000 persons are required by state law to register for life as sex offenders (and certain other offenders such as arsonists) with their local police chief or county sheriff because they were convicted of felony or misdemeanor sex-related crimes such as rape, child molestation, sexual assault, indecent exposure, or possession of pornography.
When Must Sex Offenders Register?
Sex offenders are required to register within five working days after release from a local jail or state prison, completion of any alternative sentence, and when they change their name or address. In addition, each sex offender is required to register annually within five working days of their birthday. Sex offenders convicted of felonies who fail to register can be charged with a felony, which may result in a "third strike" conviction.
Classifications
Since 1996, each convicted sex offender is classified as either a "high-risk" sex offender; "serious" sex offender or "other" sex offender as defined by the Penal Code. Currently more than 64,000 sex offenders are classified as "high risk" or "serious," allowing for public disclosure of specific information. The remaining 13,000 registered sex offenders are classified as "other" and not subject to public disclosure. Each month, approximately 300 sex registrants are released from the Department of Corrections.
California Program for Identifying Offenders
In conformance with a federal statute known as "Megan's Law," state and local law enforcement authorities in California have implemented programs to notify residents when a high-risk offender is present in their neighborhood.
The state distributes CD-ROM computer discs to local law enforcement agencies and operates a "900" telephone hotline to provide the public with information on the community of residence and the zip code of felony sex offenders. The Governor has requested additional funding from the 1999-00 Budget Bill to update the information on a monthly instead of quarterly basis. The state provides detailed information to local law enforcement agencies prior to the release of high-risk sex offenders, and authorizes those agencies to provide specific warnings and information about such offenders to schools and individuals determined to be at risk from their presence in the community.
Landlord's Responsibilities
California has enacted legislation that requires rental property owners and sellers to make certain disclosures to tenants and purchasers regarding the existence of the database that contains the names of registered sex offenders. Since July 1, 1999, the State of California has required the following language be inserted in all residential leases, in not less than eight-point type:
Registered Sex Offenders Notice: The California Department of Justice, sheriff's departments, police departments serving jurisdictions of 200,000 or more and many other law enforcement authorities maintain for public access a data base of locations of persons required to register pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 290.4 of the Penal Code. The database is updated on a quarterly basis and a source of information about the presence of these individuals in any neighborhood. The Department of Justice also maintains a Sex Offender Identification Line through which inquiries about individuals may be made. This is a "900" telephone service. Callers must have specific information about individuals they are checking. Information regarding neighborhoods is not available through the "900" telephone service.
The new law also provides: " . . . Upon delivery of the notice to the lessee or transferee of the real property, the lessor, seller or broker is not required to provide information in addition to that contained in the notice regarding the proximity of registered sex offenders. The information in the notice shall be deemed to be adequate to inform the lessee or transferee about the existence of a statewide database of the locations of registered sex offenders and information from the database regarding those locations. The information in the notice shall not give rise to any cause of action against the disclosing party by a registered sex offender …nothing in this disclosure law alters any existing duty of the lessor, seller, or broker under any other statute or decisional law, including, but not limited to, the duties of a lessor, seller or broker under this article . . ."
Penalties for Denying Housing
At the same time, the mere fact that an individual is listed on the 900 number or the CD-ROM does not appear to allow a rental property owner to deny housing or to evict them based on their status. The penalties for violation of this statute include actual damages, treble damages with a minimum of $250, attorney's fees, exemplary damages or a civil penalty not exceeding $25,000.
Owners are advised to make sure they have updated their leases to conform to this legal requirement. The California Apartment Association and it's local chapters can provide support in the form of background papers, compliant forms and other materials to help you stay informed.
(Helaine Ashton is a partner with Kimball, Tirey, and St. John. The law firm specializes in landlord/tenant law and represents clients throughout California. Any questions regarding the contents of this article should be made by calling (800) 564-6611.)
The above discussion is general in nature and should not be construed as individualized legal advice. Readers are cautioned to seek individualized legal assistance based on a detailed analysis of their particular facts and circumstances. If you have any questions regarding the above material or any other matter involving landlord-tenant issues, you may contact the Law Offices of Kimball, Tirey and St. John, 800-338-6039.



















Comments
Comment by: joe
- Aug 27, 2008 10:50:52 PMmore sex offender laws is just more ignorance.The laws now are over board. what people should do is get informed and not allow any more stupid laws be imposed that dont do any good and causes your taxpayer dollars to be wasted.
dept of justice website shows true statistics
not just hype from uneducated ignorants on a witch hunt. what is the next witch hunt you or your family when you molest a kid or pee on a wall and have to register for life? the ignorant people dont realize rediculous knee jerk reaction laws for politicians to gain office only does harm to america. its dirty and vile to protray such ignorance. anyone can be a sex offender with laws the way they are. and what about the people who are supposed to be protecting you like judges and district attourneys who molest children or any law they break and get away with it because they are above the law. look at these men who worked for dept of homeland security being charged with luering children for sex. this has been a social problem for ever and if it wasnt illegal as it isnt in some places it wouldnt be thought as sick. most men we all know look at young girls sexually even at boys. even the people criticizing others because they feel guilty about what they think about. common sence is needed here because until the next ignorant person gets caught for doing it himself and he or his family member to be ostracized as today this whole witch hunt will get stupider by the day. what then when you get caught. The way the laws are now it is worse for someone to do a sex crime than it is to kill a kid and not molest them, they dont have to even register, how does that look? so the hype and sensationalism train everyone flocks to when one more kid killing happens need to be proportionate and focused on that person. the witch hunt has to stop. more and more people are agreeing every day that the witchunt and scarlet letter has to stop and registration put to a halt with offenders addresses bieng put on websites as it does no good and harms the PEOPLE that dont deserve it anymore. or where innocent all together. some offenders where minors themselves or barely adults. i do agree with high risk offenders get the shaft but not all of the people who ever did a sex crime. after all people are people and make mistakes. doesnt god forgive everyone? even sex offenders, yes he does. People need to stop mutating the label pedophile as a pedophile is a offender who preys on little kids. not every one who does a sex offence. when you or a family member is entrapped into a plea bargain for peeing outside lets say then you will be labeled a pedophile.
Comment by: stockton
- Feb 18, 2009 12:29:36 PMI have read much about the issue of a landlord/managers responsibility to it's tenants should they discover that they have a serious registered sex offender renting from them..I still do not understand what the true obligation is or if there is one. This individual parades around with very little clothing on at times and actually makes derogatory remarks and comments and has been known to play grab-ass games with some of the tenants-what can I do? What can I say to the tenants without being legally in the wrong? Why list these people that are convicted of such crimes if are hands are tied and mouths buttoned up for fear of legal retribution.
Comment by: Informed Mother
- Sep 8, 2009 12:53:01 PMA couple of days ago on a fluke, I happened across the website: www.familywatchdog.us and typed in my street. Lo and behold, a picture of the on-site Property Manager for my complex comes up, complete with three convictions; ranging from rape by force to sodomy with a minor. That was a sight I was NOT expecting to see!
As I have minor children, I am greatly concerned for their welfare, as well as, the other children who reside in the complex. According to the article above, we (the tenants) should have been notified of his living there. Whether he were considered "high risk" or not. That is definitely need-to-know information.
Thanks for this article. I am definitely alerting the company that employs the Property Manager and seeking legal counsel to see what rights I have to be able to break my lease.
Post a Comment