Powered by RealTown Blogs
Rooftop Views

First house = duplex?

Ki Gray, broker in Austin, Texas, has a great idea about buying a duplex as your first home.

There is a lot of talk about getting your first house. It is part of the American Dream to get a house and maybe get a dog named Rover. But maybe that first home should instead be a duplex. Why would I propose such a thing? Is it possible I am a secret Russian spy that hates American pie? No, there are simply too many advantages to buying a duplex first.

Buying a duplex has a number of financial advantages over buying a house. A lot of people assume duplexes would sell for about twice of what a house sells for in the same neighborhood. This is rarely the case. Duplexes are more frequently about 1.5 times the price of a house in a given area. So to pick an easy number if a house is selling for $100,000 then a duplex should be selling for $150,000.

So let's compare buying a house to a duplex. To keep things the same let's assume we have $20,000 to put down and we are looking in the Austin real estate market so that the taxes are 2.5 percent of the purchase price and insurance is 0.4 percent of the purchase price.

1. Lower Monthly Payment
To start off with let's look at the house. For the house we are going to have a 6.5 percent interest rate. We can use this mortgage calculation:

$100,000 house price
$20,000 down payment

Monthly Payment = $747.32

Moving on to the duplex. Because duplexes usually have higher interest rates we are going to assume a 7 percent interest rate. We are also going to assume that the other side of the duplex is being rented for $650.

$150,000 duplex price
$20,000 down payment

Monthly Payment = $1,184.18
Rent Payment minus 5 percent vacancy = $617.50
Monthly Payment minus rent = $566.68

The monthly payment on the duplex comes out to be 31.8 percent less than on a house. You might get different numbers based on your area. In most areas, a duplex leads to a lower monthly payment but there are a few real estate markets where the opposite is true, so always run the numbers.

2. Increasing Your Future Real Estate Purchasing Power
Besides the advantages of a lower mortgage payment, buying a duplex first allows you to make additional purchases while buying a house first can negate your ability to buy additional properties.

To understand why this is the case, we need to understand a few rules about how banks determine whether or not to provide loans. When you are purchasing your first investment property, banks will usually not count the rent as income unless you have owned investment properties for more than two years.

So, if a buyer first buys a house and then wants to buy a fully rented duplex, they will need to be able to qualify for the full price of the house and the duplex combined. This can be difficult for someone in the beginning stages of their career. If a buyer purchases a duplex first, in two years when they are looking for a house, they can count the rent from the duplex as income—which can help them qualify for the bigger house purchase.

3. Faster Pay off
Here is another interesting way to look at it. If instead of simply spending the saving you incurred by owning a duplex, you could pay off your mortgage faster. If you applied $747.32 to your house it would take 30 years to pay off. But, if you paid your duplex of $566.68 and then took the additional $180.64 and applied it to your mortgage you could pay off your duplex in 18.5 years. So in 18.5 years you would have a $150,000 duplex paid off instead of a $100,000 house partially paid off.

4. Greater Benefits of Mortgage Pay Off
Not only will you pay off your duplex faster, but once you have paid if off you will be in a better position. Once you pay off your house, you are living mortgage free—but not payment free. Based on the original assumptions (Austin Texas 2.5 percent tax rate and 0.4 percent insurance rate) you are still making a payment of 241.66 a month for taxes and insurance. In contrast once the duplex is paid off you are not only living in your duplex for free you are actually getting a profit of $255 a month.

Buying a duplex is not for everyone. Some people do not want the hassle of managing a property. And this article is not proposing that everyone should buy a duplex. But there are financial benefits to buying a duplex, so take it into consideration.

6:08 PM - Jan. 16, 2008 - comments {0} - post comment


How to pick a financial planner

The folks at Kiplinger's offer the following steps to make sure your financial planner will do the best job for you:

Financial and investment planning often consists of creating a comprehensive overview of your current financial condition along with recommendations for achieving your future financial goals. Depending on its complexity, such a plan can cost you anywhere from several hundred to several thousand dollars.

People are also likely to turn to a financial planner for help with less sweeping challenges. What to do with a lump sum received from an inheritance is a common problem, teeming with tax and investment decisions that need to be made in a hurry.

A good planner will see to it that your investments are diversified and appropriate for your goals and stage in life: growth funds for an IRA, for example, or municipal bonds to generate tax-free income. A good planner can also help you anticipate the tax consequences of your investment decisions.

Even if your planner is going to make your investment decisions, keep informed about what's happening to your account, and don't hesitate to disagree if you become uneasy about what's being done with your money. It is up to you to make sure that the planner stays in tune with your goals and risk tolerance.

A planner's credentials are the most obvious clue to his or her preparation for the job. The best-known credential is the Certified Financial Planner (CFP) designation. In addition to the CFP, other leading planning credentials indicating extensive training include the ChFC (Chartered Financial Consultant), and the CPA/PFS (Certified Public Accountant, Personal Financial Specialist).

The Yellow Pages are full of the names of planners, but start your search with a reference of some kind, from friends, family, or co-workers. Lawyers, accountants, mortgage professionals, and insurance agents are also good people to ask. Once you've got a list of planners with recognized credentials, call or visit two or three, comparing their fee structures and their competence as investment advisors.

Fee Structure
Planners earn their keep in one (or more) of three ways. Some work on a fee-only basis, charging you by the hour or by the specific task. Others collect commissions on the products they sell you, such as stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and insurance policies. Many charge a mixture of fees and commissions.

An advisor's fee structure is no indicator of competence. Just because a commission-based advisor is likely to pick a fund with a sales load and a fee-only advisor would probably choose a no-load fund, it doesn't mean that the commission-based planner isn't acting in your best interest. However, in the end, while you might not pay the commissioned planner any more than you pay the fee-based advisor in the case of that fund load, the sales load is coming out of your investment, leaving less working for you in the market.

Investment Record
A planner you're considering should be willing to give you information on how other clients' portfolios have performed. Compare those records with one another and the performance of the markets as a whole before making a choice. Often the advisor will provide you with comparable performance benchmarks to give you an idea where to look on your own. Pay special attention to how well the planner has done in achieving the objective you'll be pursuing, whether it's for growth, income, or a combination. Ask the planner to sketch out how he or she would deploy your financial resources, and decide whether you like the result.

12:51 PM - Aug. 18, 2007 - comments {0} - post comment


Get ready for the tax man

It's that time again...time to start gathering all of that dreaded documentation for your tax preparer to send to good old Uncle Sam! And even though this may seem like a very painful process, taking just a few simple steps right now will make your tax planning far less painful than you think.

STEP ONE: Start by reviewing a copy of last year's tax return, and make a quick list of all the documents or statements that were needed to complete the return. Examples would be W2 forms from employers, 1099 forms for income earned but with no withholding for taxes, 1098 forms documenting all interest paid on a mortgage, interest and dividend income from banks and other financial institutions, a statement for stocks and bonds that were sold during the year, donations that were made to charities, and property tax statements. Many tax accountants will provide a checklist for you, but if you do not have access to one, simply hit this hotlink: TAX PREP CHECKLIST and use this generic checklist as a guide.

STEP TWO: In the coming weeks, you'll be receiving tax documents in the mail. Some will be easy to identify, as many institutions use envelopes marked "Important Tax Document", but others do not - so check all your incoming mail very carefully. When a tax document arrives, grab your checklist, mark the item as received, and keep it all in one place like a file or large envelope marked "2006 TAXES". That way, when it is time to meet with your accountant, all documents will be stored in one location.

NOTE: the IRS rules require that most tax documentation like W2's be mailed out to you by January 31st. If you do not receive all needed tax documentation by February 15th, contact the company that was supposed to send it out, and request the documentation be mailed immediately. If the company fails to comply, contact the IRS at 1-800-829-1040 for help. Additionally, if a statement is received and the amount reported appears to be incorrect, contact the company who sent it to you right away, and ask that the form be corrected. Within a few days a new form should be mailed, and when received it will be marked "Corrected".

With the tax laws constantly changing and the complexity of filing taxes increasing every day...having a great tax accountant will save you time and money. In fact, most tax accountants find enough missed deductions or changes to more than cover their nominal fees. And, working with a professional can help ensure that your return is as accurate as possible, and may help avoid a painful audit. During 2006, audits for individuals increased by 6% across the board. Business owners need to be on their toes too, as audits for Partnerships increased by 15%, and S-Corporations by 34%!

1:51 PM - Jan. 24, 2007 - comments {0} - post comment


Watch out for those Mutual Funds!

'Tis the season for giving, and this is also a good time to give to yourself by putting away some year-end savings.

But if you invest in a Mutual Fund that is about to pay a distribution before the end of the year, you could get caught in a tax trap...a trap that many innocent investors fall victim to.

Be sure to research the fund you are about to invest in and find out if it's planning to have a year end distribution. Here is how a distribution from a Mutual Fund typically works. If the price of the fund is $10 per share and the fund does a $1 taxable distribution just before the year is over, the share holder gets the $1 either in cash or the equivalent amount in additional shares. But the value of the fund drops by that same $1, which would bring it down from $10 to $9 in this example. The net value is the same to the shareholder, but the $1 distribution is now taxable.

So let's say someone invests $10,000 in a fund that is about to pay a year-end distribution. They get a statement showing a $1,500 distribution, and typically the money is re-invested right back into additional shares. The value per share declines to account for the distribution, but the additional shares received still keep the value of the account at $10,000...but now the shareholder has a $1,500 taxable gain, which could mean a $500 tax bill for some. Talk about a Bad Santa.

To avoid this unpleasant surprise, visit the websites of the Mutual Funds that you may be considering and determine if the fund will be paying distributions in December. If you do determine that the distribution will occur in December, and you need to avoid a big taxable gain, wait until the fund's "ex-dividend" date (after the money has been deducted from its share price), and then make the investment into the mutual fund. Or, consider investing the money in the same Mutual Fund, but buy the Mutual Fund as an IRA, or see if you can invest additional funds into your 401K - and then the distributions will be tax deferred.

It's so important to add to your savings...but take just a few minutes to understand and determine the dividend date on Mutual Funds, so you can ring in the New Year without having to give Uncle Sam an unnecessary present.

9:24 AM - Dec. 10, 2006 - comments {0} - post comment


You CAN retire

We get a weekly e-newsletter from the Motley Fool.  For those of you not familiar, this is an organization who advises people on stock and bond investing.

 

In the last newsletter, they had a question from a couple who want to retire in 10 years - before their retirement plans would begin to pay off.  Most of their assets are in real estate - two homes that are paid off plus a 401(k) that needs to be rolled into something and a savings account.  Motley Fool advised they should either (a) sell both homes and move into something smaller (b) use one of the homes for rental income and (c) use a reverse mortgage to get income.

 

Remember the Motley Fool is advising on stocks and bonds - NOT real estate.  What they could have advised is to sell one or both homes and invest in income producing real estate.  With the amount they would have to invest, they can leverage into some pretty nice income property.  Remember you can usually get into income property with 20% or so down.  So a $300,000 nest egg can get you into a $1.5M property.  That's a nice apartment building or small shopping center.

 

Then they can roll their 401(k) into a self-directed 401(k) which will let them invest in income producing property as well. 

 

Don't think you need to depend on just stocks or bonds for retirement planning.  Real estate has a proven track record returning more than stocks and bonds.

 

We are working on a new website devoted to just this topic which we hope to have up and running within the next 30 days or so.  In the meantime, let us know if you have questions.

1:34 PM - Sep. 17, 2006 - comments {0} - post comment


Sell your house to protect the profit?

Yes, you read this right.  Some people are actually considering selling their primary residence - which has increased in value by thousands of dollars in the latest real estate run up - in order to protect whatever profit they have.

 

A home is the biggest asset that most people have.  And, we believe, one of the biggest sources of retirement savings.  We think people who say Americans don't know how to save don't understand that savings doesn't always have to be sitting in a passbook account collecting 2% interest.  But that is for another day.

 

Since most people saw huge increases in the value of their homes in the past 5-7 years they are now concerned that there will be a real estate down turn which will take that profit away.  But, if they sell where will they invest?  We have read about investing in dividend-paying stocks as well as other stock related investments.

 

Problem is, there is no guarantee that the stock market won't experience a down turn.  Historically, real estate has out peformed the stock market.  And the rate of return on real estate investment has usually been 2% or so higher than inflation.  We can understand being nervous about having all your "eggs in one basket" so if that's the case, consider taking out some of the profit throgh a refinance and spreading your dollars into other investments - stocks, bonds, and other pieces of real estate.

 

We think selling your primary residence to "protect the profit" may be one of the most irrational ideas we have heard in a long time.

3:53 PM - Aug. 16, 2006 - comments {0} - post comment


Can you still flip?

Remember the days when you could buy a property, slap on  a coat of paint and some new carpet and sell it for several thousand dollars profit all in a few weeks time?

 

Well, those days are pretty much over.  Yes, you can still buy investment real estate and you can still fix it up and sell it for a profit.  It will just take longer in today's market.

 

Here are some of the new ground rules:

 

  • Hold onto the property longer.  Double digit appreciation is all but gone with the exception of a very few markets.  You will need to hold it longer to make the profit.


  • Fix it up: The better it looks, the better the resale value.


  • Know your market: Research the city, neighborhood, etc. where you plan to make the investment purchase to see if the area is on the upswing.


  • Consider the area job market. If unemployment is on the rise, the number of possible buyers is shrinking.


  • Profile buyers.  What is the amount you hope to get for the property?  How does that stack up with the pool of available buyers.


  • Enlist the help of agents.  Real estate brokers know the market inside and out.  They can provide valuable insight - and maybe marketing!


  • Pay attention to neighborhood (a worse house in a good neighborhood is better than the best house in a bad neighborhood.)


  • Pay attention to appreciation.  Don't plan on double digit appreciation in today's market.

1:30 PM - Aug. 2, 2006 - comments {0} - post comment


Banks in real estate

Interesting article in The Denver Post stating that Colorado banks have increased their real estate portfolios in the past five years.

 

Seems that since 2001 Colorado bank holdings in real estate have increased from 48.8% to 59%.  There is a similar trend nationwide.  Colorado Division of Banking commissioner says he "appreciates the concern" about real estate concentration.  Even though banks have posted solid earnings quarter after quarter.

 

So why do banks invest in real estate?  Because it's safer than the stock market and historically offers more long term gain.  Is there a possible down side?  Yes, if foreclosures spike and home builders invest in less land for new construction bank earnings could go down in the short term.

 

But there is a lesson here.  If banks, whose stock in trade is conservative investment strategies, feel that real estate is a better investment, shouldn't the average investor feel safe putting money into real estate as opposed to the stock market, the bond market or other securities?

 

Listen to your banker.  Invest in real estate.

3:23 PM - Jul. 18, 2006 - comments {0} - post comment


More bubbles

In a recent article by Jeremy Ames of Guidant Financial Group he talked about real estate investors and the "real estate bubble."

He pretty much agrees with us that the "bubble" is mostly a figment of the media's imagination.  That doesn't mean there won't be market changes, however.  Some people are "get rich quick" junkies who don't want to, or can't, wait out any market down turn.  Others have the ability to stay put.

His list of the survivors includes:

  • Homeowners without Adjustable Rate Mortgages
  • Cash Flow investors
  • Cash Investors

The Casualities are likely to include:

  • Speculative Investors
  • Those with Family Emergencies or Job Transfers
  • Adjustable Mortgage Holders

But the biggest losers are those who are scared away from investing any of their money and those who invest without considering all the risks.

2:47 PM - Jun. 15, 2006 - comments {0} - post comment


Denver apartment market improves

After years of increasing vacancy rates, Denver's apartment market appears to be making a comeback.  The rate for the first quarter 2006 was 7.4% which is the lowest it's been since 2000.

Newly constructed communities are still facing vacancies of arond 25% while units that are 1-4 years old have the lowest vacancy rates at 7%.

Average rental rates for all units is $835 which is up from $822 in the past year.  There are 165,000 existing units in communities of at least 50 units as of April 1st with another 15 projects under construction that will add 1,719 units to the area. There are 3,400 units currently in some stage of the development process but some of those may ultimately not be built.

The continued stabilization is actually a result of the high foreclosure rate in Colorado.  There are fewer renters purchasing new homes and those people who have had to leave their homes due to foreclosure are renting apartments.

Over the long tern, Denver is an excellent place for apartment investments although experts believe the apartment market will stay soft through 2007.

6:01 PM - Jun. 8, 2006 - comments {0} - post comment


Description
Denver real estate news and views, Mile High musings and general thoughts on the state of the state.
Home
User Profile
Archives
Email Us
Blog Manager
Recent Entries
- Shape up that curb appeal
- Comparing loan programs
- De-stressing your life
- The Housing and Economic Recovery Act
- Saying "tell me more"


RSS Blog Feed

Categories

General Real Estate Information
What makes Denver great
Foreclosures
Investing in Real Estate
Denver
Home Buyers
Home Sellers
Mile High Musings


Favorite Links

Home
Rooftop Realty Web Site
Colorado Real Estate Commission
HUD and VA Homes for Sale


Favorite Blogs

Discover Columbus
Bitchin' in the Kitchen with Rosie
Ardell's Seattle Area Blog
Manhattan Loft Guy
Real Estate Snippets
Active Rain
Phoenix Real Estate Guy