Welcome to the New RealTown! Submit Feedback
Member Login | Join RealTown
The Real Estate Network

Affiliate Moderator

Blog by Steve Farace
Malvern, Pennsylvania

Steve Farace, Director of Marketing and Member Relations and staff liasion to Affiliate Member Forum

Subscribe

Your E-mail Address:
Subscribe to:

Recent Comments

RE: The Seller's Advantage in a Buyer's Market
Hey, it turns out that I'm not the only one who th...
re: The Credit Crunch
Great advice in this scarey time...

Affiliate Moderator

Anatomy of a Like-Kind Exchange

Apr. 18, 2008

 


Real estate investors frequently are not fully advised of the mechanics and benefits of §1031 exchanges by their tax or real estate advisors. Section 1031 exchanges permit the non-recognition of capital gains, when investment or business property is “exchanged” for other investment or business property. Non-recognition of capital gains means simply that the taxes that would otherwise have been due on the profits have been postponed to a later date. So, how does an investor properly structure a §1031 exchange, and what will it look like.

 

The non-recognition provisions of §1031 have been part of the tax law for more than eighty years. For the first seventy years, there was no formal guidance from the Internal Revenue Service, leaving exchanging to the most adventurous investors, or those with the most aggressive tax counsel. In 1991, the Service issued Regulations providing detailed guidance in the form of “safe harbors.”
The first thing to keep in mind is that it is important for the taxpayer to discuss the benefits of a tax-deferred exchange with his tax advisor. Further, it is imperative that the client make the ultimate decision to participate in an exchange before the close of title on the relinquished property. The Regulations require that the taxpayer enter into an exchange agreement with a qualified intermediary at or before closing. Prudent investors, therefore, typically engage the services of a reputable qualified intermediary days or even weeks before the scheduled closing date. The ideal time to do so is immediately upon the signing of contracts for the sale of the property. This enables the intermediary to coordinate with the attorney and other professionals associated with the transaction.
 
At that time, it is wise to provide the intermediary with a clear copy of the real estate contract. The intermediary will use the information contained in the contract in a myriad of ways during the exchange process. The first is to obtain the names of the taxpayer and of the buyer, as well as the address and price of the relinquished property. The intermediary will typically contact the attorney at this point to inquire about any details that may be unique to the transaction
 
Further, the intermediary will prepare the exchange agreement, paying particular attention to language and terms specifically required by the Regulations. Additionally, the taxpayer must assign his rights under the real estate contract to the intermediary.
 
As closing approaches, the intermediary will contact the closing agent to determine familiarity with the exchange process, and to ensure that the closing procedures comply with the Regulations. At the closing, the purchaser will acknowledge that the taxpayer had embarked upon an exchange and had assigned his rights to the intermediary. Closing costs, attorney fees, mortgage payoffs, and other items routinely paid from the seller’s funds are paid at the closing table. Any remaining funds that would otherwise be paid to the taxpayer are, at this time, paid to the intermediary on behalf of the taxpayer. This is crucial, because the taxpayer must avoid even “constructive receipt” of the proceeds in order to protect the validity of his exchange.
 
During the exchange, with very few exceptions, taxpayers may have no access to the exchange proceeds. The taxpayer may receive the exchange proceeds upon the 46th day, if he has not previously identified replacement property. (More on this later.) The taxpayer may also receive the exchange proceeds upon the 181st day, if he does not actually acquire all of the previously identified replacement property. Between the 45th and 181st days, the taxpayer may only receive his exchange proceeds upon the occurrence of a material contingency related to the acquisition of the replacement property, that was provided for in the purchase contract, and which is beyond the control of the buyer and seller. An example of such a contingency would be the denial of a zoning change request. Failure to obtain financing on terms satisfactory to the taxpayer, or the seller removing the property from the market are not regarded as such contingencies.

Home Sweet Home

Aug. 14, 2007

The interaction of §121 (exclusion of gain on the sale of a principle residence) and §1031 (non-recognition of gain or loss in like-kind exchanges) has long been the subject of confusion for taxpayers. Recently, the Internal Revenue Service issued Revenue Procedure 2005-14, providing clear guidance on this issue.

 

Section 121(a) provides that a taxpayer may exclude gain realized on the sale or exchange of property, if the property was owned and used as the taxpayer’s principal residence for at least 2 of the preceding 5 years. Section 121(b) provides generally that the amount of the exclusion is limited to $250,000 ($500,000 for certain joint returns). Section 121(d), as amended by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-357, provides that, for sales or exchanges commenced after October 22, 2004, taxpayers who acquired property in an exchange to which § 1031 applied, must hold the property for five years from the acquisition date before they may apply the § 121 exclusion.

 

Section 1031(a) provides that no gain or loss is recognized on the exchange of property held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment (relinquished property) if the property is exchanged solely for property of like kind (replacement property) that is to be held either for productive use in a trade or business or for investment. Under § 1031(b), gain must be recognized, however, to the extent that the taxpayer also receives cash or property that is not like-kind property (boot) in an exchange that otherwise qualifies under § 1031(a).

 

Revenue Procedure 2005-14, issued February 14, 2005, "applies to taxpayers who exchange property that satisfies the requirements for both the exclusion of gain from the exchange of a principal residence under § 121 and the nonrecognition of gain on the exchange of like-kind properties under § 1031." The Revenue Procedure applies only to taxpayers who satisfy the 'held for productive use in a trade or business or for investment' requirement of § 1031(a)(1) with respect to both the relinquished business property and the replacement business property.

 

Since neither §121 nor §1031 addresses the application of both sections to the exchange of a single piece of property, this Revenue Procedure was necessary to provide guidance to taxpayers who exchange property that satisfies the requirements for both the exclusion of gain from the exchange of a principal residence under § 121 and the nonrecognition of gain on the exchange of like-kind properties under § 1031.

 

To garner the benefits of both §121 and §1031, new rules must be followed:

 

(1) Application of § 121 before § 1031. Section 121 must be applied to gain realized before applying § 1031;

 

(2) Application of § 1031 to gain attributable to depreciation. Under § 121(d)(6), the § 121 exclusion does not apply to gain attributable to depreciation deductions for periods after May 6, 1997, claimed with respect to the business or investment portion of a residence. However, § 1031 may apply to such gain; and

 

(3) Treatment of boot. In applying § 1031, cash or other non-like kind property (boot) received in exchange for property used in the taxpayer’s trade or business or held for investment (the relinquished business property), is taken into account only to the extent the boot exceeds the gain excluded under § 121 with respect to the relinquished business property.

 

Read More…