Archives
June 2008
Jun. 30, 2008 - Manhattan loft inventory as of June 29
Number of Manhattan lofts offered for sale as of Sunday night:
| price range |
# of lofts |
| $500k to $999k |
102 |
| $1mm to $1.99mm |
242 |
| $2mm to $2.99mm |
170 |
| $3mm to $3.99mm |
91 |
| $4mm to $4.99mm |
43 |
| $5mm to $10mm |
79 |
| TOTAL |
737 |
This total is (still) essentially unchanged since my first count on May 19, which was 745. See that May 19 post for what I am counting, and why it is difficult.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Inventory
|
Jun. 29, 2008 - new Manhattan loft listings + closed sales in last 7 days
This is my thirty-fifth report on the number, price distribution and neighborhood distribution for Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market or as closed sales in the last 7 days.
The stats as of Sunday night show a(nother) slow(ish) week (hmmm) ...
-
there were only 19 lofts reported as new to the market in the last 7 days and 25 as sold
-
10 of the 19 new ones are offered between $1mm and $3mm, while 17 of the 25 closed sales were between $1mm and $3mm (and none above $3.6mm)
-
3 of the 19 new loft listings are in new development, and only 2 of the 25 closed sales were in new development
|
By price
|
New = 19
|
Sold = 25
|
|
$500k to $999k
|
3 |
5 |
|
$1mm to $1.99mm
|
5 |
10 |
|
$2mm to $2.99mm
|
5 |
7 |
|
$3mm to $3.99mm
|
2 |
3 |
|
$4mm to $4.99mm
|
1 |
|
|
$5mm+
|
3 |
|
|
By neighborhood
|
New = 19
|
Sold = 25
|
|
Battery Park City
|
|
|
|
Chelsea
|
2 |
1 |
|
Clinton
|
1 |
|
|
East Village
|
|
1 |
|
Financial District
|
8 |
1 |
|
Flatiron
|
2 |
5 |
|
Gramercy
|
|
1 |
|
Greenwich Village
|
3 |
3 |
|
Kips Bay
|
|
|
|
Little Italy
|
|
|
|
Lower East Side
|
|
1 |
|
Murray Hill
|
|
|
|
Midtown West
|
|
|
|
SoHo
|
1 |
3 |
|
Tribeca
|
|
4 |
|
Turtle Bay
|
|
2 |
|
Upper East Side
|
|
1 |
|
Upper West Side
|
|
1 |
|
West Village
|
2 |
1 |
New loft listings in new developments
| 421 West 54 Street (The Hit Factory) |
1 |
| 45 John Street |
1 |
| 25 Broad Street (The Exchange) |
1 |
Sold lofts in new developments
| 20 Pine Street |
1 |
| 415 Greenwich Street (Tribeca Summit) |
1 |
For information about how I get this stuff and why I slice it as I do, see methodology for New + Sold in The Last Seven Days.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: New Listings, Sales, Closed, West 54, Hit Factory, Pine, Broad, Exchange, Greenwich, Summit
|
Jun. 26, 2008 - head-scratching over $650/ft and outdoor space
opportunity? we got opportunity
For the first time in months, I am going to comment on another firm's Manhattan loft listing today -- without identifying it in deference to my resolution in end of an era for Manhattan Loft Guy / a new day dawns? from April 9 -- because it seems to me to be a great opportunity for a loft buyer at about $650/ft. The loft is in a building that has always represented value to me; it is duplexed but with a real 2 bedroom 2 bath layout; it has outdoor space that looks pretty usable ("free" under the $650/ft pricing of interior space); and the price has come down about 25% from its original asking price.
issues? we got issues
Of course there are some deficits, which is why The Market has let it hang. Some people just don't like duplexes. Some folks don't like the block this building is on. This unit has a rather large monthly expense ratio (roughly $2.00/ft). Can't tell if it in need of a remodel or upgrading, but it could be 'move-in'.
Whatever ... I have always liked the building. (This is not a fringe neighborhood, I promise.) You simply will not find many (any?) Manhattan lofts at this price-per-foot point, let alone with "free" outdoor space.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Outdoor Space, Maintenance, Price Per Foot
|
Jun. 25, 2008 - 23 days to nearly done (now done) at 19-21 Warren Street
brisk results
The Manhattan loft #2E at 19-21 Warren Street came to market at the end of February and had a signed contract 23 days later. It shows as Sold & Closed as of this morning (no clearing price available yet).
The 5 story loft was converted to condo in 1999 into the common 2 Long-and-Narrow units per floor, one east, one west. That was the time when Virtual Doorman seemed to gain some traction (didn't last, I don't think), so this one has that (potentially cool) feature. It is somewhat modestly named the Tribeca East (on the block that ends at City Hall Park), though it could just as easily be "Tribeca South".
not much bragging...
This one is said to be "1,602 sq ft", in "excellent" (presumably, original 1999) condition. Chef's kitchen, 12 foot ceilings, French doors, ceilings fans are pretty much the sole bragged-about points. The classic Long-and-Narrow layout has 3 windows in front, 4 in back, both bedrooms in back, with the plumbing running up the side that adjoins the west unit (of "1,619 sq ft") and common hallway. They were asking $1.85mm and $1,529/mo, and probably got it (or close).
There's a small "terrace" (balcony?) across the bedrooms, but that may not be such a plus on the second floor with the back of 9 Murray Street not very far away. (Check the bedroom photos.)
... but much appreciated
This seller paid $1.15mm in March 2004, a surprisingly large discount (to me) off the then-ask of $1.295mm. The only more recent sale in the building I see with a clearing price was #2W, which transferred only a year later (and only "17 sq ft" larger) for $1.515mm. (Which one is the anomaly??)
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Warren, Terrace, Closed, 1999, Tribeca East, City Hall, Murray, Virtual Doorman
|
Jun. 24, 2008 - closing in the Textile Building 66 Leonard Street
"gimme a 4!" ... OK, then please give me a 3 (pretty please)
#10C at 66 Leonard Street was offered for sale in January 2007 at $4.295mm. Our listing history shows a contract signed in February last year but that must have fizzled (no deed was filed) and it was noted as Permanently Off the Market in October. The same agent brought it back to market this past January at that same price, then within six weeks of the March 28 price drop to $3.995mm they had a signed contract, with a closing noted as of last week.
No clearing price available yet, but it looks as though the change from a price starting with a $4... to a price starting with a $3... did the trick. Funny how simple it can be (in retrospect). Well, not so funny, in fact.
psychology
We'll know more when the trading price is public, but at every Major Round Number there are buyers who will not cross a threshold. In this case, that appears to be what happened with this Manhattan loft and the $4mm threshold. That's not to say that $300k is chicken feed, but 7% is hardly a huge discount. Depending (of course) on how close to $3.995mmthey actually got, this may simply be a case where a buyer would not even consider a "4" but went for the top of the "3"s. After all,the place had been on the market a long time in both 2007 and 2008 without a deal off of $4.295mm but got one within six weeks of the 7% solution.
lovely loft, BTW, with hefty monthlies
The space is said to be "2,914 sq ft", set up as 3 BRs + 3.5 baths, with 3 exposures. The common charges of $2,209/mo support a health club with steam room, a residents lounge and roof deck, and not only a doorman but a resident manager -- a lot of overhead for a 44 unit building.The taxes of $2,518/mo support ... the city. (The turn of the [last] century building was converted to condo in 1999, obviously without a tax abatement.)
your friend, and mine
Follow along with sales in this building through StreetEasy, here.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (2) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Leonard, Textile, Closed, Price Drop, Threshold, Psychology, Common Charges, Abatement, Resident Manager
|
Jun. 23, 2008 - Manhattan loft inventory as of June 22
Number of Manhattan lofts offered for sale as of Sunday night:
price range
|
# of lofts
|
$500k to $999k
|
98
|
$1mm to $1.99mm
|
251
|
$2mm to $2.99mm
|
171
|
$3mm to $3.99mm
|
91
|
$4mm to $4.99mm
|
45
|
$5mm to $10mm
|
83
|
TOTAL
|
749
|
This total is (still) essentially unchanged since my first count on May 19, which was 745. See that May 19 post for what I am counting, and why it is difficult.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Inventory
|
Jun. 22, 2008 - new Manhattan loft listings + closed sales in last 7 days
This is my thirty-fourth report on the number, price distribution and neighborhood distribution for Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market or as closed sales in the last 7 days.
The stats as of Sunday night show a slow week ...
-
there were only 17 lofts reported as new to the market in the last 7 days and only 11 as sold
-
11 of the 17 new ones are offered between $1mm and $3mm, while 5 of the 11 closed sales were between $2mm and $3mm
-
5 of the 17 new loft listings are in new development, 2 of the 11 closed sales were in new development
|
By price
|
New = 17
|
Sold = 11
|
|
$500k to $999k
|
|
1
|
|
$1mm to $1.99mm
|
8
|
1
|
|
$2mm to $2.99mm
|
3
|
5
|
|
$3mm to $3.99mm
|
2
|
1
|
|
$4mm to $4.99mm
|
|
2
|
|
$5mm+
|
4
|
1
|
|
By neighborhood
|
New = 17
|
Sold = 11
|
|
Battery Park City
|
|
|
|
Chelsea
|
4
|
2
|
|
Clinton
|
|
|
|
East Village
|
|
1
|
|
Financial District
|
1
|
1
|
|
Flatiron
|
2
|
1
|
|
Gramercy
|
|
|
|
Greenwich Village
|
3
|
1
|
|
Kips Bay
|
|
|
|
Little Italy
|
|
|
|
Lower East Side
|
|
|
|
Murray Hill
|
|
|
|
Midtown West
|
1
|
|
|
SoHo
|
|
|
|
Tribeca
|
3
|
4
|
|
Turtle Bay
|
|
|
|
Upper East Side
|
|
|
|
Upper West Side
|
|
|
|
West Village
|
3
|
1 |
New loft listings in new developments
420 West 25 Street (Loft 25)
|
2
|
34 Leonard Street
|
1
|
122 Greenwich Street (Jackson Square)
|
2
|
Sold lofts in new developments
90 William Street (be@William)
|
1
|
1 York Street
|
1
|
For information about how I get this stuff and why I slice it as I do, see methodology for New + Sold in The Last Seven Days.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: New Listings, Sales, Closed, Loft 25, West 25, Leonard, William, Greenwich, Jackson, York
|
Jun. 20, 2008 - 11 West 20 Street #2 closes / did they get THAT??
Today's new inter-firm list of Sold & Closed includes the Manhattan loft on the 2d floor at 11 West 20 Street, which is interesting (to me, at least) for a few reasons: (a) it can be either commercial or (when "re-zoned as of right") residential, (b) it seems to be an extremely minimal 'white box', (c) it took only 9 weeks to get a contract from the first offering in mid-March, and (d) the (successful) asking price of $2.5mm is $350k higher than two 2007 sales of fully finished units. Did they really get (close to) $2.5mm?? (No closing price yet that I can find.)
very flexible white box, indeed
The building history is accessible through StreetEasy, of course, here, where you can peak at the now-gone Halstead listing for the 2d floor. Talk about a flexible space ... while there are only the traditional front-and-back windows, there are no interior columns in this roughly 27 x 88 foot space (wide enough for two real bedrooms in back). 13+ foot vaulted ceilings must only enhance the sense of open space.
a history of lower-priced mints
The 8th floor was said to be in "mint" condition when it sold in February 2007 at $2.15mm off an asking price of $2.25mm, while the 5ht floor was said to be in "triple mint" condition (not to mention, "magnificent") when it sold in January 2007 for the then-asking price of $2.125mm (reduced from the original $2.25mm asked). Number of mints aside, these two points seem pretty strong indications of value of fully finished lofts only a year and a half ago. Yet the 2d floor was successful asking $2.5mm for a loft that should require another $400k to $500k (using a $200/ft benchmark for this "2,200 sq ft" space).
coming back to market soon?
The 8th floor had been offered for sale since October at $2.85mm (in "spectacular" condition), a price that is more in line with a successful 2d floor sale off of $2.5mm (though still a hefty premium from its February 2007 trade at $2.25mm or the January 2007 very mint-y closing of the 5th floor). But that listing is no longer on PruDE's site -- though it has not been updated to the other firms as off the market. If #2 got close to $2.5mm, what should the 8th floor get?
Color me curious (about the clearing price of #2).
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: West 20, White Box, Renovation, Longandnarrow, Comps, Streeteasy
|
Jun. 18, 2008 - the problem with anecdotes / reports from 40 Bond Street and Time Warner
Though a relatively short piece, Josh Barbanel's June 8 Sunday NY Times review of market data (A Mixed Picture) was rich for me, generating a June 11 post (data point in a sideways market / closing at 32 West 18 Street) and a June 13 post (Barbanel gives up Manhattan sales data in NY Times, grudgingly). Obviously, I have been thinking about it a lot. Here's more.
not bashing Barbanel, honest
Like so many newspaper articles about Manhattan real estate, Barbanel's piece was a mix of big picture data and specific "facts", in this case about some high-end price reductions. Skeptic that I am, I tend to wonder if the facts fit the story line, so it is nice when the facts presented are specific enough that I can find the details elsewhere. Here are Barbanel's facts, with my emphasis added:
At a number of celebrated recent developments, from the Time Warner Center facing Central Park, to 40 Bond Street off the Bowery in NoHo, condo owners have trimmed their asking prices on resales.
At 40 Bond, the resale asking price on a three-bedroom triplex was cut by $1 million in late May, to $10.9 million, or about $2,900 a square foot. Dennis Mangone, a broker at the Corcoran Group who recently had three listings in the building (one was just rented), said that competition between the sponsor (there is still one unsold one-bedroom ) and individual owners had “cannibalized resales” and that he expected prices to appreciate considerably in the next year.
At Time Warner, there are now 16 apartments on the market, according to Streeteasy.com, including three for which the asking prices were cut in the last few weeks, two of them by more than $1 million.
I read the story line of this piece as Manhattan-showing-signs-of-slowing. Here was the set-up for Barbanel's use of the 40 Bond and Time Warner anecdotes:
Yet there were some signs of caution in the preliminary numbers, the first indicator of the contracts signed in the spring selling season, which usually continues through the Fourth of July. The number of sales closed during May was 20 percent below May 2007, when the number of sales set a record for any single month. They were, however, above the sales volume recorded in May 2006.
million dollar price drops sound like trouble, no?
I think a fair reading of the sequence is that Barbanel is talking about these million dollar price drops as suggesting more "caution". But the data don't support that view (yet) because those million dollar drops -- while dramatic -- are off huge asking prices, seeking huge gains.
Checking the inter-firm data base and public data for closed transactions, it is easy to find the 3 BR triplex at 40 Bond that Barbanel cites as a price cut. In fact, that unit closed October 18, 2007 in the sale by the developer at $7.9mm, was immediately offered for flipping (October 19) at $12.2mm, but bumped to $11.9mm in March, and to $10.9mm in May (that drop in May was the million dollar drop Barbanel cites).
asking for a two million dollar gain
I don't see evidence of a slowing market in this history. Of course, the asking prices don't tell us much more than the attitude of the seller and agent, but -- so far -- this seller and this seller's agent are pretty bullish, as even a sale at $10mm in the next 4 months will gross a $2mm gain in a year. (Who knows if it will sell, of course.)
As always, StreetEasy is a good source for the details for any Manhattan coop or condo; 40 Bond Street info is here.
asking for the moon
Meanwhile at the Time Warner Center, one of those million dollar price drops was from $32mm to $29.995mm (it has just been dropped again, to $29.65mm) for a duplex (high floor, park views? you bet), the two original units of which were purchased for a combined $9.5mm in January and February 2004. I don't read a lot of market negativity into an asking price that is three times the 4 year oldpurchase price.
One other of those million dollar drops at Time Warner was from $20.5mm to $18.95mm for an apartment that closed for $8.9mm in March 2005 and was resold for $13mm a year ago. (As far as I can tell,the third million dollar drop was one part of the duplex offered, combined, for $29.65mm.)
Again, StreetEasy is your friend, with interesting building info for the two Time Warner towers here and here.
Again, not bashing Barbanel here. Just wondering about the specific "facts" offered to support a story line that don't quite do the trick. Though I would expect that an experienced reporter like Barbanel would ask about the sales history of the specific listings he uses to support his story line. Maybe next time....
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Barbanel, Ny Times, Closed, Sales, Listings, Time Warner, Bond, Price Drop
|
Jun. 17, 2008 - another Broadway odyssey / 710 Broadway (finally) closes
toddler no more
When I hit the Manhattan loft on the 2d floor at 710 Broadway in January, it was in its toddler stage, having passed its listing-birthday in December (Jan 9, 710 Broadway is slimmer after holiday break). Property Shark (but not StreetEasy) reveals the information that a deed was filed transferring this loft on June 5, for $2mm.
As I said in January about it's history
It took only 2 weeks off the market over the break of the year but is back today [January 9], at the slightly reduced price of $2.195mm. (It started at $2.5mm in December 2006, changed firms in March and has been at $2.295mm since April, with a long summer vacation off the market.)
negotiable, indeed
Thus, the sellers were rather negotiable off of the $2.295mm asking price, with a deal struck at $2mm even (how low did the bidding start??). If the quoted size is accurate, that is $816/ft.
I noted in January that the layout was both quirky and challenging:
This “2,450 sq ft” space is relatively narrow at 21.5 feet, with the classic three windows in front (over Broadway) and in back; it is also tall enough (at 14 feet) to have a mezzanine over the kitchen and bathrooms with 2 sleep loft / office spaces. The footprint is challenging, so narrow that the 2d “bedroom” in the back is only 7.5 feet wide, with a long ‘dressing room’ between it and the window. The plumbing is in the middle of the loft, so the bathrooms are back-to-back and a long way from the bedroom.
There are no pictures of the kitchen or baths (and no bragging unless you count “jacuzzi”), which is consistent with my recollection that these elements are pretty dated.
"Quirky" may limit the market of potential buyers (fewer people appreciate your quirks), but "challenging" definitely limits the market. The result (at this location) is a clearing price wll below average for a Manhattan loft.
long, but not that long
This is the second recently completed odyssey on this block. 714 Broadway #4 took more than two years, as I noted in an April 30 post, O - d - y - s - s - e - y ends at 714 Broadway with 4th floor closing. (Irritating fact out of the Manhattan Real Estate Industrial Complex is that that coop sale -- for which a deed was filed almost 3 months ago -- does not yet have a publicly available sales price that I can find.)
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (2) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Broadway, Square Feet, Renovation, Longandnarrow, Price Drop, Closed, Price Per Foot, Negotiable, Layout
|
Jun. 16, 2008 - Manhattan loft inventory as of June 15
Number of Manhattan lofts offered for sale as of Sunday night:
price range
|
# of lofts
|
$500k to $999k
|
104
|
$1mm to $1.99mm
|
256
|
$2mm to $2.99mm
|
175
|
$3mm to $3.99mm
|
93
|
$4mm to $4.99mm
|
45
|
$5mm to $10mm
|
78
|
TOTAL
|
751
|
This total is (still) essentially unchanged since my first count on May 19, which was 745. See that May 19 post for what I am counting, and why it is difficult.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Inventory
|
Jun. 15, 2008 - new Manhattan loft listings + closed sales in last 7 days
This is my thirty-third report on the number, price distribution and neighborhood distribution for Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market or as closed sales in the last 7 days.
The stats as of Sunday night ...
-
there were 22 lofts reported as new to the market in the last 7 days and 27 as sold (a rare week in which sales were greater than new listings)
-
17 of the 22 new ones are offered below $3mm, while 15 of the 27 closed sales were between $2mm and $4mm
-
only 3 of the 22 new loft listings are in new development, but 11 of the 27 closed sales were in new development
|
By price
|
New = 22
|
Sold = 27
|
|
$500k to $999k
|
7
|
3
|
|
$1mm to $1.99mm
|
5
|
9
|
|
$2mm to $2.99mm
|
5
|
6
|
|
$3mm to $3.99mm
|
2
|
9
|
|
$4mm to $4.99mm
|
1
|
|
|
$5mm+
|
2
|
|
|
By neighborhood
|
New = 22
|
Sold = 27
|
|
Battery Park City
|
|
1
|
|
Chelsea
|
3
|
5
|
|
Clinton
|
1
|
1
|
|
East Village
|
|
|
|
Financial District
|
4
|
2
|
|
Flatiron
|
3
|
3
|
|
Gramercy
|
|
2
|
|
Greenwich Village
|
3
|
2
|
|
Kips Bay
|
1
|
|
|
Little Italy
|
|
|
|
Lower East Side
|
|
|
|
Murray Hill
|
|
|
|
Midtown West
|
1
|
|
|
SoHo
|
1
|
2
|
|
Tribeca
|
1
|
8
|
|
Turtle Bay
|
|
1
|
|
Upper East Side
|
|
|
|
Upper West Side
|
|
|
|
West Village
|
4
|
|
New loft listings in new developments
45 John Street
|
1
|
25 Broad Street (The Exchange)
|
1
|
414 Washington Street (Pearline Soap)
|
1
|
Sold lofts in new developments
| 650 Sixth Avenue |
2
|
52 West 22 Street (Paper Factory)
|
1
|
72 Mercer Street
|
1
|
415 Greenwich Street (Tribeca Summit)
|
6
|
8-10 Warren Street
|
1
|
For information about how I get this stuff and why I slice it as I do, see methodology for New + Sold in The Last Seven Days.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: New Listings, Sales, Closed, John, Broad, Exchange, Washington, Pearline, Murray, Greenwich
|
Jun. 14, 2008 - (actual) recent Manhattan loft sale at 115 Fourth Avenue reported in NY Post
unlike the Times ...
... the NY Post's weekly feature Just Sold does claim to be about "recent" Manhattan sales, and the report from June 12 includes a loft at The Petersfield, 115 Fourth Avenue, that closed with a deed filed May 1 -- that's pretty "recent", and far more recent than the NY Times hit on June 8 that I addressed in (not very) recent NY Times Residential Sales / 22 Mercer Street loft sold in February.
The Post said:
EAST VILLAGE $2,060,000
115 Fourth Ave.
Two-bedroom, two-bath loft condo, 1,800 square feet, with dining room, granite kitchen countertops and S/E exposures; building features doorman and roof deck. Common charges $1,200, taxes $883. Asking price $2,175,000, on market 26 days. Broker: Wendy Richardson, The Corcoran Group
They are right. We show the loft as a new listing on February 15, with a contract signed on March 12. In a leap year, that's 26 days (I overlooked the leaping in my first calendar count.).
StreetEasy's got a cache of the Halstead listing, here. (Street Easy shows this deed as filed May 3; I took the May 1 date from Property Shark; why can't we all just get along??) Further weirdness: StreetEasy doesn't have the trading price yet, but Property Shark shows it as $2,020,000 -- not the $2,060,000 reported in the Post. (Gimme an arrrggghhh...)
As always, StreetEasy is a good source for information about current listings in a building (and past sales); click here for this building's info.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (3) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Ny Post, Ny Times, Sale, Closed, Petersfield, Fourth, Streeteasy, Property Shark
|
Jun. 13, 2008 - Barbanel gives up Manhattan sales data in NY Times, grudgingly
stingy reporter!
I referred in Wednesday's data point in a sideways market / closing at 32 West 18 Street to "Josh Barbanel's latest frustrating review of market data from Sunday's New York Times (A Mixed Picture)" as an intro to that discussion about one recent Manhattan loft closing as indicative of a "sideways market". Let me take some time to address what Barbanel reported, then what he wrote.
In a world hungry for real-time data, Barbanel's occasional articles referencing "last month's" sales data as recorded with the City's Department of Finance provide just a smidgen of a hint of a taste. In his June 8 piece he looked at May closing data and reported
(1) "that median and average apartment prices edged up slightly, to a record level, nearly $1.54 million (excluding recent closings at two of the most expensive new developments ever, at 15 Central Park West and at the Plaza Hotel)"
(2) that the "number of sales in May, filed with the Department of Finance by the middle of last week, was higher than in any month since August 2007"
and (3) that the "number of sales closed during May was 20 percent below May 2007, when the number of sales set a record for any single month. They were, however, above the sales volume recorded in May 2006"
Good stuff, all. But -- as usual -- he leaves out the detail, the raw numbers that some people want (OK, this person needs).
a reporter, not a blogger
This is not a criticism so much as it is a lament. Oh how I wish he would give up his raw numbers. No one else I know tracks the monthly Finance Department filings; no one I know publishes monthly sales data. He digs in the monthly numbers for these occasional articles, in which he uses what fits his purposes and does not bother to (does not need to) reveal the details. If he gave the raw numbers, we could build up over time a set of data closer to The Holy Grail of real-time Manhattan real estate reports. But he holds the raw data close, and highlights different data points at different times.
It's his column; he can do what he wants, but I am jealous about the data he sees that I can't see.
Maybe I just need to step back and appreciate what he gives us, rather than rue what he could give if only he took direction from me. I have been down this road before, such as in December 17's more actual data / November sales in Manhattan more or less steady , where I quoted him (in his vague glory) from a December 16 article Manhattan Market Remains Stable:
Last month, the number of closed sales just about matched the number closed in November 2006, and prices were considerably higher, but roughly flat compared with the prices in the previous quarter, according to a review of sales records filed with the city.
reading the tea leaves
To scramble food metaphors here, let's look at the crumbs in last Sunday's article about what happened in May.
(1) With both average and median prices up, the May closings imply that sellers are holding and that buyers are willing. (I use the weasel word "imply" because the gross data of average or median price can mask a lot, as we do not know the mix of large vs. small or resale vs. new development transactions.)
(2) With more May sales than in any month since August, that is a ton of sales, since Miller Samuel reported 3,499 Manhattan coop and condo sales in the Third Quart of 2007 (the second highest quarterly total ever), some good part ofwhich must have come from a healthy September, and 2,514 in the Fourth Quarter (more than any quarter in 2006; indeed, more than any other quarter but two going back ten years; see my January 3 Q4 reports coming in / demand continues ). How many sales in "a ton"? Dunno. Arrggghhh.
(3) If May 2008 had 20% fewer sales than the best-month-ever-for-sales-in-Manhattan, May 2007, that ain't bad at all (year over year, 2007 beat 2006 by about 35%). Again, that implies that sellers are holding and that buyers are meeting them, in gross terms.
hopin' and wishin'
If I were Barbanel's editor I would have him dump his raw data into a hyperlink, the way David Leonhardt sometimes does with his economics columns, or Frank Rich always does with his Sunday screeds. But I don't think I am qualified for that job. And I don't think they are hiring. Sigh.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Barbanel, Ny Times, Closed, Sales, Demand, Miller Samuel
|
Jun. 12, 2008 - (not very) recent NY Times Residential Sales / 22 Mercer Street loft sold in February
silly me
I just checked the fine print in this past Sunday's NY Times feature Residential Sales Around the Region and was surprised not to see the word "recent" modifying "sales" anywhere on the page. I have just been assuming that the sales reported in this feature would be recent sales ... how newsworthy is old data?? Newsworthy or not, the one loft in Sunday's report closed 4 months ago. Weird. (I assume that the reporting firm [Corcoran, which must have represented the buyer, not the seller/developer] recently sent it to the Times; after all how newsworthy is old data??)
aged sale, long time coming
The common charge and tax data for the 22 Mercer Street loft reported as taking 3 weeks from "most recent listing to the sales agreement [i.e., contract]" correspond to Unit 4D, with a sales price of $3.55mm. Couple of things are interesting about the timing. First, according to city records this was the first sale of this unit (i.e., not a resale, but a direct sale from the developer) in a 16 unit building in which the first condo sales were in December 2006. Second, that "3 weeks" may be technically true but is essentially untrue: yes, the deed was recorded on February 14, the contract was signed (per our inter-firm data base) on January 16 and the "most recent listing" was December 27 BUT that followed 2 weeks of being "temporarily off the market". In fact, the unit had been marketed by Halstead beginning October 1, 2007. In fact, the unit had been represented by Corcoran from October 2005 into January 2007, then taken off the market for more than 9 months by the developer, who then switched to Halstead.
The developer kept raising the ante over this long time, by the way. According to the available listing history, they started with Corcoran at $2,750,800 on October 3, 2005, immediately pulled it off the market (October 4), then jumped to $3.15mm when it came back on February 27, 2006 and again to $3.3mm on June 28, 2006, where it sat until being taken off the market on January 5, 2007. When it was revived with Halstead on October 1, 2007 they offered it at $3.6mm.
some contracts during construction
Remember 2005? That was back when it was fairly common for buyers to buy in new development off floor plans and examples of finishes. The #2D history shows a similar (though shorter) history: originally offered on October 3, 2005 for $2,392,000, then raised quickly (October 6) to $2.55mm, then taken off the market on October 25 until March 17, 2006 when it returned at $2.95mm. It found a buyer and contract May 15 and closed on January 12, 2007. Apparently, they did not like the (low) level of sales activity beginning in October 2005, but found the stage of construction more conducive to contracts by Spring 2006. Except for #4D, of course.
one more, and I will stop
#3D has an interesting history, according to our data base. Offered in October 2005 at $2,631,200 then pulled back, and then the data got garbled. Not sure when the contract was signed, but the developed sold to someone who -- per the data on Street Easy -- flipped it through PruDE, starting at $3.495mm in January 2007, dropped immediately to $3.395mm (so quick the first resale price may have been a typo), then in contract by February 22 and closed by March 29, 2007 at $3.2mm.
This is a bit garbled because StreetEasy does not show the original sale, just the flip in March 2007. Property Shark, in contrast, does not show the flip, but does show the original sale at $2.2mm as being recorded on March 27, 2007. Perhaps this flip was an assignment?? So the original buyer bought at $2.2mm (the Property Shark price) and transferred the same day at $3.2mm (the StreetEasy price)??
Whatever, the key is that the flipper/assignor in #3D began to offer that unit in January 2007 at $3.395mm just 3 weeks after the developer pulled #4D off the market after not selling at $3.3mm -- and #3D got a contract and closing in March at $3.2mm, while the developer waited until October 2007 to bring #4D back at $3.6mm. Fortunately for the developer (and for Halstead), #4D ended up fetching $355k more than #3D, though I bet the developer made a concession about transfer taxes.
I have to stop. That was so garbled even I have to go back and look at the numbers in order to follow what I am saying here. Let's just say -- if you have followed along this far -- that the #4D sale reported in last Sunday's Times was not "recent" and that the developer recouped on #4D a Little of what it 'lost' on #3D (after all, the #3D flipper grossed $1mm but had to pay at least one set of closing costs, probably two).
as always...
To keep up with this building fairly easily, check the StreetEasy page for this condo here.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (3) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Mercer, Ny Times, Closed, Streeteasy, Property Shark
|
Jun. 11, 2008 - data point in a sideways market / closing at 32 West 18 Street
... and sometimes the bear gets you
I need to address Josh Barbanel's latest frustrating review of market data from Sunday's New York Times (A Mixed Picture) soon, but the money quote for me was from The Miller, who:
said that unsold inventory was running about 27 percent above that of last May, a time when inventory was unusually low. He said the market was “moving sideways, flat” with some apartments selling for less than they would have a few months ago, and some selling for more, a trend that he believes is likely to continue.
poster child for "selling less" in Altair 18
32 West 18 Street #2B (Altair 18), had been for sale since October, starting at $4.6mm, dropping to $4.2mm, then $3.995mm, then $3.75mm, then (finally) $3.5mm in April, with $5,186/mo (condo). [The original PruDE listing info is gone from their site but Street Easy is a good ("easy") source of information about past sales (and current listings) in a building; this building's page is here.] It had a signed contract in May and shows up as Sold & Closed in the inter-firm data today. While that is undoubtedly a huge relief for the sellers after 7 months and 5 prices, that sweet relief comes at quite a cost.
The closing price is not yet posted on city records that I can see, but the price trajectory suggests they did little better than the final asking price of $3.5mm (if that). The now-breathing-again seller was the original buyer of this unit (although he never moved in) in August 2007. He paid $3.45mm then (his during-construction contract was signed in August 2006) and launched his flip attempt within 3 months of closing, looking for a 33% bump. That did not work out.
The market for this particular loft has been flat, at best, over nearly a year -- something that neither the seller nor his agent predicted.
been here, hit that (twice)
I hit this loft as part of a nice pair of dueling open houses in January (back when I was doing that sort of thing) with a similarly priced loft at 217 West 19 Street. That post was old enough that I did not get around to scraping it off when I pulled posts thatcommented on then-current listings from other firms, so it is still here: January 18, dueling $4mm open houses at 217 West 19 Street + 32 West 18 St.
Indeed, I hit this one again in a more recent post that did get scraped just a few days after I wrote it in early April. But I saved the text of that one, so here is a trip down Manhattan Loft Guy memory lane:
I hit 32 West 18 Street #2B (Altair 18) when it was not-quite-new, along with a similarly priced (at that time) loft, 217 West 19 Street 9th floor. My point in that open house duel post was that there would probably be a 65% overlap between open house visitors to these two lofts, due to their proximity, similar prices and size, and both being new-ish condos "from the high end of the catalogue". January 18, dueling $4mm open houses at 217 West 19 Street + 32 West 18 St. The histories of these two Manhattan lofts could hardly be more different since then.
a lot of history in a short time
#2B had come to market in October at $4.6mm, dropped to $4.2mm in December and to $3.995mm just before that January 18 post. (Common charges and taxes are $5,186/mo.) They dropped the price again in February to $3.75mm and again this weekend -- down to $3.5mm. As I said in January,
"you’d get “3,292 sq ft” with “everything you expect” from architects Cetra/Ruddy (including a 23 foot long Rosewood kitchen), but you won’t get any views to speak of (2d floor) and only 4 windows at each narrow end. Altair 18 has an attended lobby (217 West 19 Street does not), with monthly expenses commensurate with a high level of service (concierge, La Palestra gym, roof deck with cabana)."
net net hurts hurts
The critical context for this price history is that these flippers (the loft has never been lived in) signed a contract in October 2006 (during construction) and closed in August 2007 at $3.45mm. Obviously, the tiny spread between purchase price 8 months ago and current asking price will be dwarfed by round trip transfer taxes and other big-ticket expenses. OUCH.
I see only one other attempted re-sale in the building. #11A is newly for sale (last week), asking $5.8mm for "3,007 sq ft" with Empire State views and "custom redesigned everything". That unit was bought (newly constructed with high-end finishes, but not yet "custom redesigned") for $4mm in August 2007, with a contract signed in July 2006. (Common charges and taxes are $4,591/mo; why so much lower than #2B??)
I don't know if the sad history of #2B is because it is a second floor unit or if The Problem is more general for the Altair 18, which The Market loved enough to sell out last year. If #11A has a happy ending (for those flippers), it will look like a second floor problem only.
other happy news (for a different seller)
The other loft in that January open house duel has had a shorter history. The 9th floor at 217 West 19 Street came to market January 12 at $4.1mm, dropped to $3.995mm within 4 weeks and found a buyer and a contract within 3 weeks of that (single) drop. That history shows the sellers are satisfied and implies the sellers are happy. That one is a little smaller than #2B at Altair 18, in a 2002 building without all the amenities of Altair 18 (as noted above), but with similar sounding bling and unusual light and views. My January comment was that it
was “designed for the most discerning buyer” (see the listing for the bling-bling verbiage). That’s all good, of course, but it will earn its money (or not) because of the 52 feet of north windows (that bright needle is the Empire State Building) and another 52 feet of south windows (windows are 10 feet tall). And the south wall has a full length balcony. There are not many lofts with this length of glass and this kind of view behind that glass.
They are asking $4.1mm and $2,703/mo (condo) for “2,611 sq ft”.
That glass (and what is behind [outside] that glass) were well received by The Market.
happier seller on 19th street
The other half of that 'dueling open house' pair fared better. As I said in closing that April7 post, above, it found a contract within 6 weeks of coming to market in January at $4.1mm, after one price drop to $3.995mm. It has since closed (7 weeks ago) at $3.9mm, less than a 5% discount from their original asking price.
I still think that these two dueling units are an interesting pair, having been offered at the same time at similar prices, being roughly the same size, being both rather high-end renovations. Altair 18 had all those amenities in its favor (and the common charges toreflect that), while 217 West 19 Street has those amazing 9 th floor views. Those views actually point at the major deficit for #2B at 32 West 18 Street: not only does the second floor not get much light (and no direct light), the rear overlooks a parking lot and some HVAC equipment, as I recall. #2B was punished for something -- either that or (and/or?) the higher monthlies. But it is at peace now, finally.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Altair, West 18, West 19, Barbanel, Ny Times, Miller, Views, Parking Lot, Closed Sale
|
Jun. 10, 2008 - Manhattan loft inventory as of June 8
Number of Manhattan lofts offered for sale as of Sunday night:
price range
|
# of lofts
|
$500k to $999k
|
102
|
$1mm to $1.99mm
|
261
|
$2mm to $2.99mm
|
172
|
$3mm to $3.99mm
|
90
|
$4mm to $4.99mm
|
44
|
$5mm to $10mm
|
79
|
TOTAL
|
748
|
This total is essentially unchanged since my first count on May 19, which was 745. See that May 19 post for what I am counting, and why it is difficult.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: Inventory
|
Jun. 9, 2008 - new Manhattan loft listings + closed sales in last 7 days
This is my thirty-second report on the number, price distribution and neighborhood distribution for Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market or as closed sales in the last 7 days (but the first since May 18; bad, bad, bad).
The stats as of Sunday night ...
-
there were 31 lofts reported as new to the market in the last 7 days and 23 as sold
-
17 of the 31 new ones are offered above $3mm, while 16 of the 23 closed sales were below $2mm
-
5 of the 31 new loft listings are in new development, and only 2 of the 23 closed sales were in new development
|
By price
|
New = 31
|
Sold = 23
|
|
$500k to $999k
|
7
|
5
|
|
$1mm to $1.99mm
|
3
|
10
|
|
$2mm to $2.99mm
|
4
|
3
|
|
$3mm to $3.99mm
|
7
|
3
|
|
$4mm to $4.99mm
|
2
|
1
|
|
$5mm+
|
8
|
1
|
|
By neighborhood
|
New = 31
|
Sold = 23
|
|
Battery Park City
|
|
|
|
Chelsea
|
4
|
4
|
|
Clinton
|
|
|
|
East Village
|
1
|
1
|
|
Financial District
|
|
|
|
Flatiron
|
4
|
6
|
|
Gramercy
|
|
1
|
|
Greenwich Village
|
10
|
2
|
|
Kips Bay
|
|
|
|
Little Italy
|
1
|
|
|
Lower East Side
|
|
1
|
|
Murray Hill
|
|
|
|
Midtown West
|
|
|
|
SoHo
|
2
|
2
|
|
Tribeca
|
3
|
3
|
|
Turtle Bay
|
|
2
|
|
Upper East Side
|
|
|
|
Upper West Side
|
|
|
|
West Village
|
6
|
1
|
New loft listings in new developments
30 West 21 Street
|
3
|
159 Duane Street
|
1
|
133 Second Av (Theatre Condo)
|
1
|
Sold lofts in new developments
420 West 25 Street (Loft 25)
|
1
|
650 Sixth Avenue
|
2
|
For information about how I get this stuff and why I slice it as I do, see methodology for New + Sold in The Last Seven Days.
© Sandy Mattingly 2008
|
Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link View more entries tagged with: New Listings, Sales, Closed, West 21, Second, Duane, West 25, Sixth
|
|
on matters of interest to Manhattan coop or condo loft apartment dwellers, buyers, sellers, and others, especially about New York City real estate
Links
• Home
• View my profile
• Archives
• Email Me
• Blog Manager
|