Powered by RealTown Blogs

Manhattan Loft Guy

Archives

July 2008

Jul. 31, 2008 - lux diversion / Time Warner or 165 Charles as better "investment"?

not much gain for Portman
Braden Keil's Gimme Shelter grab bag in today's NY Post (hat tip to Curbed for pointing it out) mentions two celebrity Manhattan real estate transactions that caught me eye, though neither involves a real loft. The first 'news' is that Natalie Portman is selling her "convertible three bedroom, three bath apartment" (with "2,500 sq ft") at 165 Charles Street on the market for $6.55mm, but what startled me is that she reportedly paid $5.7mm in 2005. Assuming (big assumption) that she gets full ask now, her net-net gain calculation starts at $850k -- before melting away. Her transaction costs on that sale will be (in round numbers and at a minimum) 5% broker commission (they are offering 2.5% to a buyer agent) and transfer fees to NYC and NYS of 1.825%, or nearly $450k. Assuming she paid transfer taxes on her way in in 2005, that's another 1.825% on that $5.7mm purchase, or another $100k.

So, $550k of her $850k 'gain' is eaten up by round number big ticket transaction costs, whether she paid cash or secured a mortgage and assuming she gets 100% of her asking price on the way out. At least she won't have to worry too much about capital gains taxes....

Costas does well
The contrast to Bob Costas experience at the Time Warner Center (reported in the same column) is remarkable. Costas has already closed on his sale of a 61st floor 3-bedroom for $8.5mm. Like Portman, he bought his unit in 2005, but he paid 'only' $4.95mm, so his net-net gain calculation starts at $3.55mm (four times Portman's if she can sell at 100% of ask) and doesn't melt away much. He will be pleased to pay his significant capital gains, I am sure.

representative values?
I have no idea if these two transactions (actually, one transaction and one marketing effort) are representative of values in their respective buildings. But the 3-year-appreciation contrast is stark: less than a 15% gain for the Stars Wars gal if she gets her ask at 165 Charles Street, vs. 70% for the Sports Guy at the Time Warner Center.

Not that you should look at your home as an investment or anything....

 

© Sandy Mattingly 2008


 

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , , , , , ,

Jul. 30, 2008 - pretty negotiable as 17 White Street #3A closes

an 8% solution
The Manhattan loft #3A at 17 White Street came to market on March 13 at $4.5mm and found a contract within about six weeks -- the kind of trajectory that often implies a deal at or close to the asking price. It showed up as Sold & Closed on the inter-firm data base in mid-July, while the clearing price was revealed in a NY Post Just Sold feature on July 3:

 

TRIBECA $4,150,000

 

17 White St.

Four-bedroom, three-bath co-op, 3,000 square feet, with 14-foot beamed ceilings, cast-iron pillars, oak floors, modern kitchen with separate pantry, laundry room, walk-in closets, 12 oversized double-pane windows, N/S/E exposures and keyed elevator. Maintenance $1,278, 50 percent tax-deductible. Asking price $4,500,000, on market four weeks. Brokers: David Friedman, Vertex Realty Group, Jeff Roth, Citi Habitats and Richard Ornstein, Halstead Property

 

(The agents reported to the Post "four weeks" but reported to the data base a contract signed as of May 1, hence my "about six weeks". Allowing for the typical week or so between accepted offer and contract signing, that is still a pretty quick deal. And that's Richard Orenstein of Halstead, not "Ornstein", who must apparently represented the buyers.)

getting what you want
Interesting to me that the sellers negotiated quickly to a $350,000 reduction from their asking price, as that result indicates that the buyers started at something around a 10% haircut, or more. Clearly, sellers were "negotiable" from Day One. Props to Jeffrey Roth of Citi-Habitats for representing the sellers through this and (evidently) getting them what they wanted relatively quickly.

funny little block
This building is on the last western block of White Street, just west of the wide intersection where Church Street and Sixth Avenue fork -- an intersection thatalways seemed to me to be a major boundary separating this block form the rest of White Street. With White Street ending in a T intersection with West Broadway just to the west, this is one tricky location to direct a stubborn cab driver to. Then again, there's not much incidental through-traffic here.

architecturally designed
The listing description says the loft is "architecturally designed" -- which it may be, but I don't read the listing photos as making that case. (Perhaps the devil is in the details that don't show up so well in the photos.) No question that the "3,000 sq ft" Long-and-Narrow footprint is terrific. Windows on 3 sides, including 5 on one long side. There's plumbing on both long sides (kitchen on the east wall, both bathrooms opposite), and just those seven columns running down the middle of the length to work around.

If I am reading the floor plan and photos correctly, the master suite is in the middle of the long west wall -- without a window. One of the other 3 bedrooms (the one next the master) also lacks a window. But assuming that the bedroom with the multi-colored panels is one of the bedrooms on the south wall, there does not seem to be much light coming from the south, so maybe that accounts for theplacement of the master suite in the architectural design.

At more than $1,300/ft, this is a pretty healthy price in a no-amenities coop -- though the low maintenance certainly makes the cost-of-carry more reasonable.

 

© Sandy Mattingly 2008

 


Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , ,

Jul. 29, 2008 - Manhattan loft inventory as of July 27



Number of Manhattan lofts offered for sale as of Sunday night: 
 

price range # of lofts
$500k to $999k 99
$1mm to $1.99mm 228
$2mm to $2.99mm 165
$3mm to $3.99mm 90
$4mm to $4.99mm 47
$5mm to $10mm 78
TOTAL 707

 

This total is equal to the low since I started counting two months ago (my first count on May 19 was 745; two weeks ago was also 707). See my May 19 post for what I am counting, and why it is difficult.




© Sandy Mattingly 2008


Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with:

Jul. 28, 2008 - new Manhattan loft listings + closed sales in last 7 days


This is my thirty-ninth report on the number, price distribution and neighborhood distribution for Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market or as closed sales in the last 7 days
.

The stats as of Sunday night:


  • there were 21 Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market in the last 7 days and 31 as sold (an unusual week, with more sales than new listings, though 20 sales were in a single new development)
  • 13 of the 21 new ones are offered below $2mm, while 26 of the 31 closed sales were below $2mm
  • 9 of the 21 new loft listings are in new development, while 24 of the 31 closed sales were in new development (20 at be@William)

    By price
    New = 21
    Sold = 31
    $500k to $999k
    5 13
    $1mm to $1.99mm
    8 13
    $2mm to $2.99mm
    4 4
    $3mm to $3.99mm
    2
    $4mm to $4.99mm
       
    $5mm+
    2 1


    By neighborhood
    New = 21
    Sold = 31
    Battery Park City
       
    Chelsea
    1 1
    Clinton
       
    East Village
      1
    Financial District
    4 21
    Flatiron
    2 1
    Gramercy
      1
    Greenwich Village
    3 2
    Kips Bay
       
    Little Italy
       
    Lower East Side
    2  
    Murray Hill
       
    Midtown East
       
    Midtown West 1  
    SoHo
       
    Tribeca
    1 4
    Turtle Bay
    4  
    Upper East Side
       
    Upper West Side
    2  
    West Village
    1  

    New loft listings in new developments
    45 John Street 1
    60 Ann Street 1
    25 Broad Street (The Exchange) 1
    173 MacDougal Street 1
    137 Duane Street 1
    315 East 46 Street (Alexander Plaza) 4

    Sold lofts in new developments
     
    90 William Street (be@William) 20
    209 East 2 Street 1
    1 York Street 1
    475 Greenwich Street (Zinc) 2

    For information about how I get this stuff and why I slice it as I do, see methodology for New + Sold in The Last Seven Days. For my most recent rant about how soft this data may be, see
    loft or not? caution: active ranting ahead.





© Sandy Mattingly 2008


Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,

Jul. 21, 2008 - Manhattan loft inventory as of July 20



Number of Manhattan lofts offered for sale as of Sunday night: 
 

price range # of lofts
$500k to $999k 101
$1mm to $1.99mm 228
$2mm to $2.99mm 170
$3mm to $3.99mm 91
$4mm to $4.99mm 46
$5mm to $10mm 80
TOTAL 716

 

This total is up moderately from the last two weeks (my first count on May 19 was 745; last week was 707). See my May 19 post for what I am counting, and why it is difficult.




© Sandy Mattingly 2008

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with:

Jul. 20, 2008 - new Manhattan loft listings + closed sales in last 7 days


This is my thirty-eighth report on the number, price distribution and neighborhood distribution for Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market or as closed sales in the last 7 days
.

The stats as of Sunday night:


  • there were 35 Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market in the last 7 days and 21 as sold
  • 23 of the 35 new ones are offered between $1mm and $3mm, while 11 of the 21 closed sales were between $1mm and $3mm
  • 12 of the 35 new loft listings are in new development, while 6 of the 21 closed sales were in new development

    By price
    New = 35
    Sold = 21
    $500k to $999k
    3 4
    $1mm to $1.99mm
    11 6
    $2mm to $2.99mm
    12 5
    $3mm to $3.99mm
    5 4
    $4mm to $4.99mm
    1 2
    $5mm+
    3  


    By neighborhood
    New = 35
    Sold = 21
    Battery Park City
       
    Chelsea
    5 2
    Clinton
       
    East Village
    2  
    Financial District
    6 3
    Flatiron
    4 2
    Gramercy
       
    Greenwich Village
    1 2
    Kips Bay
       
    Little Italy
       
    Lower East Side
       
    Murray Hill
       
    Midtown East
       
    Midtown West    
    SoHo
    3 3
    Tribeca
    11 8
    Turtle Bay
      1
    Upper East Side
    1  
    Upper West Side
       
    West Village
    2  

    New loft listings in new developments
    397 West 12 Street 1
    420 West 25 Street (Loft 25) 2
    25 Broad Street (The Exchange) 2
    20 Pine Street (The Collection) 2
    415 Greenwich Street (Tribeca Summit) 3
    56 Walker Street 2

    Sold lofts in new developments
     
    90 William Street (be@William) 2
    137 Duane Street 1
    1 York Street 1
    415 Greenwich Street (Tribeca Summit) 2

    For information about how I get this stuff and why I slice it as I do, see methodology for New + Sold in The Last Seven Days. For my most recent rant about how soft this data may be, see
    loft or not? caution: active ranting ahead.





© Sandy Mattingly 2008


Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,

Jul. 17, 2008 - Chelsea House flipper did not reach for stars, but got out via 6 week contract


modesty wins
The sale of  the Manhattan "loft" 130 West 19 Street Unit #6B that was reported this week in the inter-firm data base caught my eye as possibly the first flip at the Clarett Group's Chelsea House development (more "loft like" than true "loft", since it was built in 2006 but that's not a battle I am going to win). Next, I noticed it was a pretty quick sale (March 22 listing at $1.475mm, May 2 contract); the deed was filed July 3 at $1.45mm though only updated in our data base this week.

But what really stood out when I dug into the building history was that the asking price for this "1,100 sq ft" 2 bedroom unit was only $75,000 more than the 2008 seller paid as the original buyer in May 2007. The "profit" of $50,000 on the July 2008 flip of the May 2007 purchase is more than eaten up by the round trip expenses (two sets of transfer taxes, broker commission on sale being only the big tickets), which was very likely a bitter pill for the seller.

Props to the seller and PruDE agents Dennis St. Germain and Scott Allison for understanding where to price the unit to sell.

averages don't apply easily
This sale is an excellent demonstration that gross market data about year-over-year price appreciation is of very limited utility in looking at specific properties. Unit 6B appreciated 3.5% from May 2007 to July 2008, lower than the gains reported in any of the Second Quarter market reports, but the facts are the facts.

In fact, the July 2008 value for #6B is lower than the original sale price of the identical #9B in June 2007 ($1.475mm). The neighbors can't be happy with the modest price for #6B, but the seller must be happy to be out.


 

© Sandy Mattingly 2008


Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , , ,

Jul. 15, 2008 - 130 West 17 Street #9S went for it + got it

how to determine "worth"?
A top-floor Manhattan loft at 130 West 17 Street was the subject of one of my occasional Going For It! posts way back on September 23, 2007 (when I was still commenting on other firm's active listings), 130 W 17 9S is new + really going for it. As in similar Going For It! posts, I was intrigued by an asking price that I could not find justification for in any traditional analysis -- nearby comps, past sales in the same building, particularly.


first, the listing history
The loft came to market on September 20 "[as a] "2,000 sq ft" loft with a skylight and the possibility of purchasing roof rights, asking a new-construction-like Manhattan loft price of $3.2mm and $2,062/mo". As I said in September, "this listing description presents a premium justification (persuasive or not is a different story), dropping "exquisitely finished", 4 exposures, "beautifully appointed", "sky-lit cook's kitchen" and "superb bathroom renovations". The listing pix are consistent with this prose...."

The price dropped on November 14 to $2.995mm, then they had a couple of "almosts": an accepted offer, then Back On the Market in January; then another accepted offer and BOM in February. Pay dirt came when a contract was signed on March 5, followed by a deed being filed June 5 for $2.85mm. (I saw that it had closed soon after, but waited to blog about it until the clearing price was available on ACRIS.)


All in all, this was a very successful marketing campaign that took longer than average to get to contract (almost 6 months) despite taking a lager than average discount off the asking price (11%).

the definition of 'successful' marketing
I characterize this as very successful because -- in my judgment -- they stretched significantly in their pricing and closed above where the comps and building stats indicated the range of values.

Data like these make the Manhattan loft market so interesting and -- to me -- so very different from the "apartment" market. Yes, all real estate is "unique", but scarcity drives value. In this case, the buyer obviously determined that this specific loft represented value for him/her at levels not implied by the comps or past building sales.

(Note that I am not saying that this buyer overpaid. Since I assume that no guns were involved in the negotiation, this buyer paid no more than s/he was willing to pay and no less than he seller was willing to accept. The 'fact' that other market data implies a lower valuation means only that they'd have had trouble financing a 'standard' mortgage.)

a lofty conundrum
As I noted in my September 23 post, the last sale in the building was "the much smaller #6S ("1,300 sq ft" which is charming, but not very bright, and in serious need of updating, even though designed by an award-winning architect (I have seen it; funky rather than spacious). It sold fairly quickly in May for $1.25mm (above the $1.195mm asking price). That's under $1,000/ft for the mathematically challenged."

Two years ago the other loft on the top floor sold. "The last sale before that one was #9N, which sold in February 2006 (and went to contract in two weeks). City records don't show that closed price, but the ask was $1.85mm for "1,700 sq ft" described (modestly?) as having "brilliant light and towering city views" and "intelligent room coordination, design and fine fixtures". Not a premium description like that for its neighbor on the 9th floor, but one could do a lot of renovation in 9N's 1,700 sq ft before getting close to $1,600/ft all-in". (With a little more digging, I see that  the clearing price for #9N was [a heavily negotiated] $1,792,500; less than $1,100/ft and about $400/ft lower than #9S traded for.)

I scratched my head in September, searching for the plus factor for #9S.

For buyers to pay the primo premium asked for 9S, there's gotta be something special about it. The other sales in the building indicate that location is not the plus factor here. The views could be a plus factor, but they appear not to have helped 9N much. The "possible" roof deck should not be a plus, since (a) you'd still have to pay for it, and (b) it is merely possible at this point. (Out door space -- especially private roof space -- can be a significant plus factor, I just don't think this possibility qualifies.) Perhaps it is the finishes and fixtures.
 
For finishes and fixtures to be the plus factor driving an atypically high price, they have to overcome the buyer's mental math how much would it cost me to build out my dream loft? and it has to match the buyer's tastes. So the market of really interested buyers shrinks as the finishes and fixtures become more (personally) stylish. The seller wants a buyer whose taste exactly matches theirs, or else the buyer won't be willing to pay a premium.
 
Time will, of course, tell.

points, general and specific
My general point here is that the truism that The Market Is Determined By The Decisions Of Individual Buyers And Individual Sellers generates -- in my opinion -- more variation for lofts than for "apartments". Perhaps because there are so many more "apartments" than lofts in Manhattan, an "apartment" buyer is more likely to have more directlycomparable choices of units in similar locations, of similar size, in similar condition. Thus, the general market should be more 'efficient'.

My specific point is that this loft closed above where it could have been expected to (by me, at least), taking into consideration its location ( a great Chelsea block, yes, but one that did not generate a premium for #9N or #6S), condition (is that renovation worth $400/ft over #9N? or even more over #6S?) and thepossibility of paying an additional and unknown amount for roof rights.

The Market is The Market is ...
Whatever I think, this buyer and this seller established The Market Price for #9S at $1,450/ft. Props to the LaChance team at Corcoran. Best wishes to the buyer for a long enjoyable life in the loft.

Hate to sound like a snob, but cookie cutters can be easier to value than "unique" lofts.
 

© Sandy Mattingly 2008
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with: , , , , , , , ,

Jul. 14, 2008 - Manhattan loft inventory as of July 13

Number of Manhattan lofts offered for sale as of Sunday night: 
 

price range # of lofts
$500k to $999k 103
$1mm to $1.99mm 232
$2mm to $2.99mm 162
$3mm to $3.99mm 89
$4mm to $4.99mm 42
$5mm to $10mm 79
TOTAL 707

 

This total is essentially unchanged from the kinda big last week (my first count on May 19 was 745; last week was 709). See my May 19 post for what I am counting, and why it is difficult.




© Sandy Mattingly 2008

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link
View more entries tagged with:

Jul. 13, 2008 - new Manhattan loft listings + closed sales in last 7 days


This is my thirty-seventh report on the number, price distribution and neighborhood distribution for Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market or as closed sales in the last 7 days
.

The stats as of Sunday night show that this was a BUSY week (following the slow and short holiday week), especially for 2 new developments:


  • there were 37 Manhattan lofts reported as new to the market in the last 7 days and 47 as sold
  • 22 of the 37 new ones are offered below $2mm, while 37 of the 47 closed sales were under $3mm
  • only 1 of the 37 new loft listings is in new development, but 28 of the 47 closed sales were in new development (11 each in Tribeca Space and Zinc)

    By price
    New = 37
    Sold = 47
    $500k to $999k
    5 14
    $1mm to $1.99mm
    17 12
    $2mm to $2.99mm
    4 11
    $3mm to $3.99mm
    6 7
    $4mm to $4.99mm
    1 3
    $5mm+