Welcome to the New RealTown! Submit Feedback
Member Login | Join RealTown
The Real Estate Network

Great Northeast Queens News

Blog by John Maniec
Little Neck, New York

Providing an on-going opportunity for the residents of Northeast Queens County here in the best part of New York City to share good and positive upcoming school, community, religious and civic events.

Subscribe

Your E-mail Address:
Subscribe to:

Recent Comments

RE: You need to know the Rules for Receiving a Cash Gift for a Downpayment on a Home
The paperwork is key.  As long as the gift is...
RE: "Landlord Duty to Mitigate Damages in Residential Lease Shot Down"
It is ridicoulous for you assholes to be able to N...
Residential Communities
Its good present for landlord to c...
RE: "Good Faith Shown By Good Works" - Mortgage Contingency Clauses
Having reviewed thousands of mortgage applications...

Favorite Links

Site Feed

RSS Feed

"Is Time Always on Your Side?" - Seller loses in Court.

May. 26, 2008
Categorized in: Real Estate Legal Issues

This legal article provided as as public service by W. Adam Mandelbaum, Esquire, Attorney-at-Law who has his law practice at 10 Audrey Avenue, Oyster Bay, New York 11771.  He can be reached at (516) 624-0240 or go to his website:  http://justiceneversleeps.net.

"Time, Time, Time Is On Your Side -- Or Is It?  --  A provision of the contract required the sellers to deliver to the buyer a certificate of occupancy covering the building and all improvements thereto, including its finished basement.

The day before the scheduled closing, the sellers, without having obtained a certificate of occupancy for the basement, purported to adjourn the closing. The buyer, claiming, inter alia, that the sellers had breached the contract, filed suit to recover his down payment.

The appellate court held that, when the sellers sought to adjourn the "time of the essence" closing date which they themselves had set, their failure to perform constituted a material breach of the contract of sale, and the buyer was well within his rights when he refused to consent to an adjournment of the closing and instead insisted upon immediate performance of the sellers' obligations.

The buyer made a prima facie showing that the sellers materially breached the contract of sale, and that he was therefore entitled to the return of his down payment.  (This was an appeal from a decision of the Westchester Supreme Court) -- Rufeh v. Schwartz (4/22/08).

Suggestion:  Before you try to enforce "time of the essence" contracts as a seller, make sure you are READY to close and have COMPLIED with all contractual conditions.

User Comments

There are currently no user comments for this entry. Be the first to post a comment!

Write a Comment

Your Name:  RealTown Members: Click here to login
Your E-Mail: 
Your Website: 
Subject: 
Your Comment: 
Notifications: 
Privacy: 
Verification: 
To verify that you are a human and not a script, please enter the verification word from the image into the box on the right.