Welcome to the RealTown Real Estate Network! Real Estate NetworkSubmit Feedback
Member Login | Join RealTown
The Real Estate Network

Just Plain Talk

Bookmark and Share   Discussion List
Group Organizer
Aug 11, 2008 11:53:31 AM
This post has not been rated.

Once in a while - maybe every few years, I am struck with the notion that we in the real estate industry are too locked in to a business model that is no longer valid.

Here is what the consumer often thinks of us:

  • Drive around in fancy cars
  • Pick up checks
  • They tell us what they do requires a lot of skill and knowledge, but they never tell us what they do for the money we pay them
  • they have an exclusive club that I can't join - called the MLS
  • They get together secretly and agree on commission prices

Here is what we think:

  • Work for free
  • Work for free
  • Lose a deal (also called work for free)
  • Maybe close a transaction and get paid
  • Work for free
  • Work for free

You have to agree - there is some major difference in our perception of our business and the public's perception - even if you don't completely agree with the above model.

There has always been an underlying resentment toward REALTORS® and their fees - usually associated with the difference between public perception and industry perception. If they don't know what we do, how can they agree to its value?

Add to the mix the relatively recent appearance of our listing data all over the Internet, and the growing armies of companies only too happy to use our listings to make it easier (so they claim) for these resentful consumers to do business almost without us! Claims of flat-fee listings services and lead generation typically feed into the sentiment that we are overpaid for what we do or don't do. So we respond with what has proven to be the worst possible response - discounts.

Now, I am not telling you not to discount. What I am saying is that we have raced to compete with each other by totally invalidating our service structure. The "I will do it for less" model only has a positive impact when everyone understands what the "it" in "do it for less" really is! So we have a broken system.

Consumers are hearing "full service" claims all day long. What that means to each real estate pro offering it is as varied as there are stars in the sky. "Full service" means one thing to one agent and something else to another. So consumers are left to guess and wonder what they are paying for. In that light, discounts are meaningless.

The current popular (as it has been for decades) "contingent on sale" commission plan is no longer valid. Consumers are able and willing to participate in their transactions. They might be greatly skilled in finding available properties. They might be skilled negotiators. They might be excited to hold their own house open on the weekend. But we sometimes list these things in our so-called full service offerings. They pay for it anyhow - thus we are unintentionally discouraging their participation.

Along come the new Internet-based companies who not only encourage consumer participation, they insist on it. This new breed will tell the consumer exactly what they will do and what the consumer is expected to do. The entire process is totally transparent. And, by the way, this is growing in popularity and acceptance. Consumers love to save money. And, not surprisingly, they love to know what is going on with their money dealings. So this new model is gaining ground.

Can we continue to lean on a broken stick? Yes, for a while. But it will become weaker and weaker. Soon it will just give way and we will be unable to hold our business up in the face of a changing economy.

So, now what do we do? Just give up?

I don't think so. I feel strongly that we have an opportunity to re-engineer our profession in ways that will call upon us to be of value to our clients, more than ever before. We need to become trusted skilled advisors. We must first gain the skills we may be light on. Then we need to determine if those skills are of value to the consumers, Finally, we offer these skills and services at a fair price - but we offer them on several levels:

  • Hourly fee for service
  • Bundled services
  • Full Service - non-contingent

Once we do make this transition we will find that our professionalism and our public perception will raise up quickly. The transparent level of what we do will become inherent in ALL that we do. Consumers will know exactly what they are paying for and, by the way, they get to choose what they want us to do for them!

Is this scary? Absolutely. It calls on us to change almost everything we do. But if we don't, how long will it be before outside pressures force us to change?

Copyright ©, Jack Harper, 2008, all rights reserved.
  1. Edited by Jack Harper on Aug 18, 2008 10:41:30 AM
Group Member
Aug 13, 2008 8:31:04 AM
This post has not been rated.

I would love to see some examples from agents who are using these models. I'd like to know what hourly rates they are successfully charging, what types of services they bundle togather and how they write up a full service, non-contingent contract.

Group Organizer
Aug 18, 2008 7:18:46 AM
This post has not been rated.
Sue asked to see some examples of how some of us are pricing services and bundles. This is a perfect question for those interested in this new business model. I hesitate to ask anyone to do this, however, as it will potentially be seen as some price-fixing discussion. Also, our price structures, bundles and "specials" constitute what amounts to some very confidential competitive information.


For instance, if I gave you a copy of my own company pricing schedule, complete with hourly, bundle and full service rates and activities, you would then have much info that could be used to compete against my company. Now, I know that you are not from my area, but others reading this are. So, it makes sense to speak in general terms here.
As to the price-fixing stuff: we have always been taught that it is bad form to discuss percentage pricing between brokerages as it could be seen as some sort of anti-consumer discussion designed to gain agreement between us to fix our pricing at a certain level. Same thing applies here. Just because we price by the hour, bundle and package does not mean we can now start freely discussing what we charge consumers. Or, am I being overly concerned?


What I will say is that we have broken down our pricing by the level of skills required to do each activity and the amount of time we estimate each activity to take. Our skill breakdown is (from lower skills to higher):

* Assistant
* Consultant
* Partner
* Senior Partner


We price these skill levels accordingly, but we don't always have each activity performed by that skill level person. For example, if an activity only requires an Assistant level skill, we might have a Partner do the activity, but we would only charge the consumer as if an Assistant did it.


Now that we have determined the skill levels, assigned an hourly price to each one, we need to determine what our hourly activities are and how much time each one will take. We use our own experience as a guideline here. This is not an exact science, but it gives us a good starting place from which we can make adjustments as we go.


All of this is published internally as our hourly rate schedule. Next, we look for opportunities to bundle those services that might be related. As an example, we might bundle advertising, Internet promotion, mail campaigns, broker tour, open house and the like into a Marketing Bundle. This bundle would then be fully priced as to the hours to complete and the package is rolled out at a slight discount - remembering that the consumer is committing to pay regardless of the outcome. In other words, we are paid for the work, not the closing itself.


Finally, we offer full rate/full service plans that are similar to our traditional full service. We can bill these either on the traditional contingent on close basis or on a non-contingent basis. In the contingent plan, we do charge a percentage of the sale, contingent on close of escrow. In the non-contingent, the consumer is agreeing to pay us "as we go." We are paid on a predetermined set of milestones. In this instance, we have eliminated the risk associated with traditional contingent plans, so we offer the consumer some very attractive pricing that rewards them for taking on that risk.


So now we have the need to both train our associates on this as well as the need to market it such that the consumers actually understand what we are doing. This, I think is a great topic for the next discussion.


Copyright ©, Jack Harper, 2008, all rights reserved.
  1. Edited by Jack Harper on Aug 18, 2008 10:42:00 AM
Discussion List

Reply to Discussion

Please log in to post a reply to this discussion.
  • Market Leader
  • Go e-PRO
  • Listing Domains
  • Top Producer
  • Point2
  • InternetCrusade.com
  • Old Republic
  • T-ReX Global
  • Docusign
  • WebsTarget
  • Matthew Ferrara
  • realEseller
  • RIS Media
  • REALTOR Benefits Program
  • Realtor Benefits
  • Allison James