Welcome to the RealTown Real Estate Network! Real Estate NetworkSubmit Feedback
Member Login | Join RealTown
The Real Estate Network

Serious concern in Short Sale negotiation

Page 2 of 2Previous Page | Next Page
Bookmark and Share   Discussion List
Group Member
Oct 31, 2009 12:10:48 PM
This post has not been rated.

Catherine, that is what I'll do Monday morning. To have some more fun with this one... the buyer just walked 2 days ago, out of frustration. It happens more and more, even after verifying that the buyer can and will wait. I'm loosing about 40% of them but, It is not so bad! I just change the wording on the property description to "Bank approved price of..." and get another buyer within days. The problem is that the banks are getting away with just about every demand and most of us, Realtors, just cave in. The banks know that our due diligent will have us give-in in most cases. That's why, I wish the NAR will take a strong stand and get us all the support they suppose to provide us as members.

Group Member
Oct 31, 2009 1:20:36 PM
This post has not been rated.

I am having the same issue with IndyMac1 st and SLS 2nd. I posted my scenario some days ago on this forum as well. My sale date is set for 11/9/09. I am waiting for the 2nd to approve on a $3,000 payout and the rest in the form of a note between the homeowner and SLS. This would be for $9,500 and due at sale of property (the 2nd wanted $12,508). A note does not have to be included in the HUD and does not have to be paid through escrow. This is the only way the 1st won't know the 2nd is getting more and nothing is being done illegally.

Unfortunately, the 2nd is taking their sweet time on the approval (or denial). In the meantime, the 1st is not willing to postpone the sale date of 11/9/09, although my approval with them is good until 11/15/09. I figure once I get a written approval from the 2nd, the 1st will then postpone the sale. I have the short sale department supervisors email and number for IndyMac which I plan to contact on Monday. Like Catherine said, I'll keep it short, sweet and professional.

Please let us know how your situation pans out. I'll keep you posted with mine as well.

The NAR NEEDS TO GET INVOLVED ..... quick.

Group Member
Nov 2, 2009 4:56:26 AM
This post has not been rated.

Thomas,

Before we can draw such a harsh conclusion we should look at the bigger picture. We don't know what percentage of the outstanding balance is being offered to the 1st or 2nd, we don't know the nature of the 2nd, e.g., were the funds used to acquire or improve the property? we don't know for sure whether the 2nd will survive foreclosure, etc.
And we don't know what instructions have been given to the servicer for the 1st …
Prior to reaching a settlement with the 1st, the owner can make any deal they are capable of making with the 2nd, even paying the loan in full, which might be far more than the 1st would agree to in a settlement. Maybe the 2nd would agree to re-write their note to make it an unsecured note in exchange for a more generous initial payment.
I am not big on creating tugs of war or putting the other party in a position where they lose face if they accede to our demands. It may come to that but it should not until we have used all of our creative strategies.

John
John E Cleek, Ph.D., e-PRO, ABR, CSP
Education and Marketing Consultant
Licensed in Kansas and Missouri
Crown Realty of Kansas
Pho: 913-709-4423 • Fax: 913-837-2549
Finding the RIGHT REALTOR . . . Priceless!

Group Member
Nov 3, 2009 5:23:33 AM
This post has not been rated.

John Cleek: you wrote: "Before we can draw such a harsh conclusion we should look at the bigger picture. "

Of course we should. I was just basing my thoughts on the info that was provided. But I stick to my opinion that the 1st mtgee should worry about what is available to itself, and not worry so much about what the 2nd is getting. What the 1st apprears to be doing, IMHO, is just playing a game of one upmanship. This is not, IMHO, IMHO, IMHO, a good business practice.

"This is a great time to buy a house".

Akron, Ohio

Group Member
Nov 3, 2009 11:48:41 AM
This post has not been rated.

I understand. We view the issue a little differently but nothing wrong there.

My view is that 2nd mortgages are often a major cause for the homeowner being in trouble on their first. They either over-bought to begin with and thus needed a second for the down pmt or to service the loan while they hoped their income would grow to cover their obligations or they used a 2nd for 'wants' rather than 'needs' and the combined obligation was more than they could manage.

If I were the lender who made the original loan in a prudent manner and there was no 2nd in sight at the time, I would be more than a little upset that the easy money that was around for HELOCs changed the ratios of debt in a negative way. If I required 20% down and then a year later they not only borrowed against the 20% equity, they found a lender who would lend them 120% of value I wouldn't be too keen seeing the irresponsible junior lender expecting me to take an even smaller percentage of my first mtg balance so they could be paid more.

Hope this makes sene to someone besides me.

John
John E Cleek, Ph.D., REALTOR®, ABR, e-PRO, CSP
Education and Marketing Consultant
Licensed in Kansas and Missouri
Crown Realty of Kansas
john@JohnCleekRealtor.com
Pho: 913-709-4423 • Fax: 913-837-2549
Finding the RIGHT REALTOR . . . Priceless!

LEGAL DISCLOSURE: John Cleek is a licensed real estate salesperson in Kansas (SAD0226442) and in Missouri (2006028722). A real estate broker or agent is qualified to advise on real estate. We do not offer legal advice. If you have any questions concerning the legal sufficiency, legal effect, insurance, or tax consequences regarding any real estate or other matter, consult with your attorney, accountant, insurance agent, tax or other appropriate professional.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of, and the original message. Thank you.

John Cleek: you wrote: "Before we can draw such a harsh conclusion we should look at the bigger picture. "

Of course we should. I was just basing my thoughts on the info that was provided. But I stick to my opinion that the 1st mtgee should worry about what is available to itself, and not worry so much about what the 2nd is getting. What the 1st apprears to be doing, IMHO, is just playing a game of one upmanship. This is not, IMHO, IMHO, IMHO, a good business practice.

Guest
Nov 3, 2009 1:52:15 PM
This post has not been rated.

What is an IHMO

Group Member
Nov 3, 2009 2:02:25 PM
This post has not been rated.

" In My Humble Opinion"

Group Member
Nov 7, 2009 9:46:01 PM
This post has not been rated.

I agree that there should be guidelines that all banks follow for short sales but that will never happen. Each short sale is different and always will be. This entire process seems backwards. Look what we do......... we list the property, gather financial information from the Seller, get an offer and then contact the bank and say guess what.... we are selling this property short and want to approve it. Now I owned property in the late 80's and early 90's but I was not a Realtor. Can anyone tell me if the process was the same then for short sales?

Page 2 of 2Previous Page | Next Page
Discussion List

Reply to Discussion

Please log in to post a reply to this discussion.
  • Listing Domains
  • Point2
  • Go e-PRO
  • Top Producer
  • InternetCrusade.com
  • RealtySoft
  • Agent's First Choice
  • REALTOR Benefits Program
  • Inman Connect
  • RIS Media
  • Realtor Benefits
  • T-ReX Global
  • iHouse Websites
  • WebsTarget
  • MyOnlineNeighborhood
  • Matthew Ferrara